Packers Huddle

paco wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 12:29

I think Lucas Patrick is respected the perfect amount for someone that is blatantly obvious the Packers would love to upgrade from.

NCF wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 11:47

paco wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 11:41

Too bad on the middle-of-the-depth chart guys.

Funchess should be there

AJ Dillon...my god...

paco wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 13:06

That actually aint half bad.

Im a little dissapointed guys who have earned paychecks from the Packers but havent given us anything on the field in return like St Brown and Funchess arent there at OTAs.

Wonder why Bortles isnt practicing?

Great Love is getting lots of reps...too bad its not to many of the guys he would actually be throwing to.

Amari Rodgers..WR2

Thanks for the updates [mention]paco[/mention] and others

I am baffled by the KaDar Hollman, Stanford Samuels absences

Like it looks like Alexander’s absence might have had some thinking the CBs were joining the WRs in protest. But guys like Josh Jackson and Kabion Ento were like “uh, nah, I gotta try to win a job”

Same with EQ and to an extent Funchess. Like y’all ain’t got that kind of leeway.

NCF wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 12:31

paco wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 12:29

I think Lucas Patrick is respected the perfect amount for someone that is blatantly obvious the Packers would love to upgrade from.

I like Patrick, but we have a ton of IOL, could be trade bait, we can't keep everyone, Patrick could bring us a starting caliber player, maybe

thanks for all the OTA comments everyone

paco wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 12:35

No savage in star on day one

if we are lucky redmond is on the field because someone in front of him didnt show up at OTAs

Yoop wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 13:40

NCF wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 12:31

paco wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 12:29

I think Lucas Patrick is respected the perfect amount for someone that is blatantly obvious the Packers would love to upgrade from.

I like Patrick, but we have a ton of IOL, could be trade bait, we can't keep everyone, Patrick could bring us a starting caliber player, maybe

I'm sick and tired of these nfl teams treating players like objects and being able to trade them whenever they want.

The Packers gave Patrick a contract. Why give Patrick a contract if they didn't intend on letting Patrick play out at that contract?

go pak go wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 13:54

Yoop wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 13:40

NCF wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 12:31

I think Lucas Patrick is respected the perfect amount for someone that is blatantly obvious the Packers would love to upgrade from.

I like Patrick, but we have a ton of IOL, could be trade bait, we can't keep everyone, Patrick could bring us a starting caliber player, maybe

I'm sick and tired of these nfl teams treating players like objects and being able to trade them whenever they want.

The Packers gave Patrick a contract. Why give Patrick a contract if they didn't intend on letting Patrick play out at that contract?

And the UDFAs! Who's gonna fight for all those 3-year contracts that are breached at the end of camp!?

I mean, at cutdown from 90 to 53, every team breaches 37 contracts they should honor to the end! That's 1,184 breached deals! The dishonor! The horror!

go pak go wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 13:54

Yoop wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 13:40

NCF wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 12:31

I think Lucas Patrick is respected the perfect amount for someone that is blatantly obvious the Packers would love to upgrade from.

I like Patrick, but we have a ton of IOL, could be trade bait, we can't keep everyone, Patrick could bring us a starting caliber player, maybe

I'm sick and tired of these nfl teams treating players like objects and being able to trade them whenever they want.

The Packers gave Patrick a contract. Why give Patrick a contract if they didn't intend on letting Patrick play out at that contract?

good point, but it's not really the same thing

OK then keep Patrick, your right, I'am wrong, we should keep every contracted player no matter if they can't win a starting job with us or not

Yoop wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 14:22

go pak go wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 13:54

Yoop wrote: ↑

25 May 2021 13:40

I like Patrick, but we have a ton of IOL, could be trade bait, we can't keep everyone, Patrick could bring us a starting caliber player, maybe

I'm sick and tired of these nfl teams treating players like objects and being able to trade them whenever they want.

The Packers gave Patrick a contract. Why give Patrick a contract if they didn't intend on letting Patrick play out at that contract?

good point, but it's not really the same thing

OK then keep Patrick, your right, I'am wrong, we should keep every contracted player no matter if they can't win a starting job with us or not

So is your 6 months worth of union talk all about really just catering to Rodgers then because you have an obsessive emotional attachment to him?

Because it is starting to seem to me you could care less about other players and their contracts.

Literally. If there is anyone who should be protected from this stuff it is players like Lucas Patrick who could use the financial protections of being in a union to get a good deal that secures he can have a living by making it to the top league in professional sports.