Yoop wrote: ↑12 Sep 2023 12:36
Labrev wrote: ↑12 Sep 2023 11:59
Yoop wrote: ↑12 Sep 2023 11:47
to bad the FO didn't
Can't use that excuse now, this just happened with a different team/FO, one that you actually said would do a way better job serving him than our stinky FO has done (oof)...
sure I can, just did, and it makes a ton of sense to me.
No idea why, seeing as the Packers FO has almost nothing to do with his supporting cast in NYJ.
never new the Jets OL coach preferred his tackles to lay down, (chop block) this is another classic example of Rodgers coaches not taking his advice, and now they got him hurt, serves those people right,
Nope, Rodgers's injury is his own damn fault. If he took what he was given and followed the play as it was drawn up than think he knows better than the coaches, because he is too arrogant to realize someone he does not think is smarter than him might still have good ideas worth listening to, then he never would have gotten hit, sacked, and injured.
It's as they say, pride comes before the fall.
But yes, it does serve the coaches right, their mistake was ever putting their faith in that stubborn donkey.
Rodgers is and always has been a big play QB, asking him to throw dinky dunkers is like asking a marathoner to run a sprint
What a ridiculous comment.
A slant over the middle of probably at least seven air yards is not a "dinky dunker" <sic>. By that thinking, every pass that is not a long ball shot play is just dinking and dunking, when in reality what people refer to as dinking and dunking are short checkdown passes to RBs in the flats and other passes around the LOS.
That completion probably moves the chains at the very least. If you want big play passes, you will have more chances to do it if you stay on the field, which means you need some plays that just move the chains.
Second, with all the space in front of him, he probably would have racked up a lot of YAC yards.
Third, that's Garrett Wilson, the Jets' best WR (on a receiving corps. that is purportedly so much better than what he had last year), whom Rodgers has compared to Davante Adams. Why on earth would you pass up an easy opportunity to get the ball in his hands, knowing he will make good things happen with it, no matter where on the field he is receiving the ball?
like asking a marathoner to run a sprint, sure they can do it, but it's not what they do best.
I think if ya want a QB to adjust from what they do best to a new preferred scheme then ya do that when there mahomes age, and even he will at times revert back to old tendencies, Rodgers can do anything and make any kind of throw but the short coastal stuff bores him, same way it would bore any great passer.
Funny thing is, you have said Mac's problem was we needed more "small ball" as you called it than all the iso vert routes. Now Rodgers's new team dials up some small ball and you are like, no, bad, small ball does not let Rodgers make downfield plays as he does best.
And it's just sooo boring.
It's why Lafleur has always given Rodgers the freedom to extend plays simply because it usually ends up hugely positive outcome, people castigate him based on the very few times it's not.
Yeah, and then LaFleur gave Rodgers the freedom to walk out the door. Notice how Matt finally stopped looking scared at the thought of not having Rodgers at QB at the end of last season? MLF got tired of his crap.