Re: Rodgers wants out
Posted: 18 Jul 2021 09:29
ya those guys really new it all
I don't particularly care for it, either. It's just the reality of how it works, right or wrong.
https://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/aaron-rod ... um=twitterThere's a funny thing that happens when a player is truly a transcendent talent.
People look for reasons to say they aren't that good.
While I can't explain the complexities of human nature that lead people to do this, I can debunk some myths.
I'll start with oe of the biggest lies floating around football talk this decade: Aaron Rodgers isn't a good in championship games.
true, but a lot of vets like Rodgers didn't agree with this contract, the old deal allowed a player to sit out a year which voided the contract and he was able to sign with another team, other vets complained about it too, eventually players will sit out, it's why it wouldn't shock me if Rodgers did it, the union sold out the older vets with this contract.NCF wrote: ↑18 Jul 2021 11:18I don't particularly care for it, either. It's just the reality of how it works, right or wrong.
Minor nitpick: Regarding 2014, the author didn't mention how Rodgers refused to throw to Sherman's area all day (except for that "free play" that wasn't.) Didn't Sherman even get hurt at one point and start limping around?NCF wrote: ↑18 Jul 2021 11:23I have been pretty critical of Rodgers' performance in all of his NFC Title Games over the years, but this is actually a really nice article that kind of breaks it all down and shows Rodgers has played well, despite the circumstances, results, and stats. Not perfect by any means, but, again, better than the stats and narratives suggest.
https://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/aaron-rod ... um=twitterThere's a funny thing that happens when a player is truly a transcendent talent.
People look for reasons to say they aren't that good.
While I can't explain the complexities of human nature that lead people to do this, I can debunk some myths.
I'll start with oe of the biggest lies floating around football talk this decade: Aaron Rodgers isn't a good in championship games.
thanks for the linkNCF wrote: ↑18 Jul 2021 11:23I have been pretty critical of Rodgers' performance in all of his NFC Title Games over the years, but this is actually a really nice article that kind of breaks it all down and shows Rodgers has played well, despite the circumstances, results, and stats. Not perfect by any means, but, again, better than the stats and narratives suggest.
https://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/aaron-rod ... um=twitterThere's a funny thing that happens when a player is truly a transcendent talent.
People look for reasons to say they aren't that good.
While I can't explain the complexities of human nature that lead people to do this, I can debunk some myths.
I'll start with oe of the biggest lies floating around football talk this decade: Aaron Rodgers isn't a good in championship games.
Kirk Cousins has had 5 years of guaranteed seasons with MN from 2018 and now until 2022.
Was his shoulder and there was no communication to McCarthy about it.Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑18 Jul 2021 11:53Minor nitpick: Regarding 2014, the author didn't mention how Rodgers refused to throw to Sherman's area all day (except for that "free play" that wasn't.) Didn't Sherman even get hurt at one point and start limping around?NCF wrote: ↑18 Jul 2021 11:23I have been pretty critical of Rodgers' performance in all of his NFC Title Games over the years, but this is actually a really nice article that kind of breaks it all down and shows Rodgers has played well, despite the circumstances, results, and stats. Not perfect by any means, but, again, better than the stats and narratives suggest.
https://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/aaron-rod ... um=twitterThere's a funny thing that happens when a player is truly a transcendent talent.
People look for reasons to say they aren't that good.
While I can't explain the complexities of human nature that lead people to do this, I can debunk some myths.
I'll start with oe of the biggest lies floating around football talk this decade: Aaron Rodgers isn't a good in championship games.
yep, Rodgers was stupid for signing that contract, could have gotten even more elsewhere with guarantee's and that team probably wouldn't have drafted his replacement 1 year later, he should have fired his agent for allowing him to sign that deal.go pak go wrote: ↑18 Jul 2021 13:53Kirk Cousins has had 5 years of guaranteed seasons with MN from 2018 and now until 2022.
If Rodgers wanted a fully guaranteed deal, he would have demanded one and signed one. He is not a victim of the "system". Which is why I feel zero ounces of "sorry" for him. He signed the deal that gave the team an out in the final season if they wanted.
Mama bear waking up.Yoop wrote: ↑18 Jul 2021 17:28yep, Rodgers was stupid for signing that contract, could have gotten even more elsewhere with guarantee's and that team probably wouldn't have drafted his replacement 1 year later, he should have fired his agent for allowing him to sign that deal.go pak go wrote: ↑18 Jul 2021 13:53Kirk Cousins has had 5 years of guaranteed seasons with MN from 2018 and now until 2022.
If Rodgers wanted a fully guaranteed deal, he would have demanded one and signed one. He is not a victim of the "system". Which is why I feel zero ounces of "sorry" for him. He signed the deal that gave the team an out in the final season if they wanted.
I don't know. I think he got a pretty good deal because he got so much money up front. Like from a financial standpoint there is just so much value there to get your money up front. I don't think Rodgers got a raw deal at all. I think he got a great deal and it also allowed some flexibility on the Packers end. It was a good and fair deal. It was an expensive deal for the Packers too.
I mean, that is the deal, right? Rodgers knows the business of the NFL. He signed a deal that makes him filthy rich for 3 years and then, who knows. We are know in Year 4 in are in the first year of who knows territory. It still pays Rodgers handsomely, but no longer protects Rodgers year-to-year.go pak go wrote: ↑18 Jul 2021 18:06I don't know. I think he got a pretty good deal because he got so much money up front. Like from a financial standpoint there is just so much value there to get your money up front. I don't think Rodgers got a raw deal at all. I think he got a great deal and it also allowed some flexibility on the Packers end. It was a good and fair deal. It was an expensive deal for the Packers too.
I mean who's to say Rodgers even wanted a guaranteed deal? At least now he can leave GB early because he is upset with the franchise. If it was fully guaranteed, the Packers literally couldn't move him even if both parties wanted to.
Yup.NCF wrote: ↑18 Jul 2021 18:47I mean, that is the deal, right? Rodgers knows the business of the NFL. He signed a deal that makes him filthy rich for 3 years and then, who knows. We are know in Year 4 in are in the first year of who knows territory. It still pays Rodgers handsomely, but no longer protects Rodgers year-to-year.go pak go wrote: ↑18 Jul 2021 18:06I don't know. I think he got a pretty good deal because he got so much money up front. Like from a financial standpoint there is just so much value there to get your money up front. I don't think Rodgers got a raw deal at all. I think he got a great deal and it also allowed some flexibility on the Packers end. It was a good and fair deal. It was an expensive deal for the Packers too.
I mean who's to say Rodgers even wanted a guaranteed deal? At least now he can leave GB early because he is upset with the franchise. If it was fully guaranteed, the Packers literally couldn't move him even if both parties wanted to.
We have been over and over this, but this was the reality when he signed. It's the Packers with the full upper hand now.