Cheese Curds - News Around The League 2023
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
The Bears watched in horror as Jordan Love tore it up the last half of the season. At that point Fields was an afterthought . So they don’t have much choice but to roll the dice with Caleb if they want to compete in the NFC North..
Love is the answer…
Caleb Williams could develop into a competent quarterback pretty fast.
The Bears could restructure the deal of Allen to reduce his cap hit for this season though. In addition they are slated to only spend a total of $38 million on those two players as Allen is under contract for the upcoming season only.
I agree that I'm glad the Packers have a much better front office than the Bears though.
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13862
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
Cowboys signed Dak to a 4 year 160 million contract. They just restructured his roster bonus.
Through 3 years they’ve only counted 63.7M on the cap and part of that cap was already can kicking from his rookie deal. He has a cap hit of ~55 million this year, ~38 million next year and ~12 million in ‘26 and 1.25 in both 27 and 28.
If they decide to not bring him back, he’ll have a cap hit over $50 million in 2025 well. That is tough to build a team around.
Through 3 years they’ve only counted 63.7M on the cap and part of that cap was already can kicking from his rookie deal. He has a cap hit of ~55 million this year, ~38 million next year and ~12 million in ‘26 and 1.25 in both 27 and 28.
If they decide to not bring him back, he’ll have a cap hit over $50 million in 2025 well. That is tough to build a team around.
Saints finally restructured their way into positive cap territory.
…and summarily exhaust it.
…and summarily exhaust it.
I would not have touched Chase Young with a 10-foot pole, nor would I ever in the future unless he totally turns things around.
He got traded to a good defense that made it to the SuperBowl and was set to hit the open market at the end of the season, so he had every imaginable reason to play hard, yet not only was he underwhelming, there are countless instances of him showing terrible effort on the field and taking plays off... even in the SuperBowl!!
If you cannot bring yourself to play hard in that circumstance, you are a hopeless case, IMO.
He got traded to a good defense that made it to the SuperBowl and was set to hit the open market at the end of the season, so he had every imaginable reason to play hard, yet not only was he underwhelming, there are countless instances of him showing terrible effort on the field and taking plays off... even in the SuperBowl!!
If you cannot bring yourself to play hard in that circumstance, you are a hopeless case, IMO.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13862
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
Random rant about ESPN.
So I see Mel Kiper released a new mock draft, I decide to click on the link and check it out. In this day and age in 2024, that is still hidden behind a ESPN+ pay wall.
Now I stupidly have an ESPN+ account through Verizon tacked on automatically against my will.
Then I even miraculously have the ESPN+ log in information properly saved in my iphone and I was able to retrieve it (didn't automatically load for some reason).
I successfully log in, however they want to send a verification code to my email. I refresh my email for about 2-3 minutes and finally lose interest. Just now saw the verification code in my junk mail filter and has since expired and I can't log in.
Still haven't seen it.
Do that actually want anyone to see their website? Not sure they could provide a much worse user experience.
So I see Mel Kiper released a new mock draft, I decide to click on the link and check it out. In this day and age in 2024, that is still hidden behind a ESPN+ pay wall.
Now I stupidly have an ESPN+ account through Verizon tacked on automatically against my will.
Then I even miraculously have the ESPN+ log in information properly saved in my iphone and I was able to retrieve it (didn't automatically load for some reason).
I successfully log in, however they want to send a verification code to my email. I refresh my email for about 2-3 minutes and finally lose interest. Just now saw the verification code in my junk mail filter and has since expired and I can't log in.
Still haven't seen it.
Do that actually want anyone to see their website? Not sure they could provide a much worse user experience.
very boomer of you to go to espn dot com seeking sports informationBF004 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024 10:59Random rant about ESPN.
So I see Mel Kiper released a new mock draft, I decide to click on the link and check it out. In this day and age in 2024, that is still hidden behind a ESPN+ pay wall.
Now I stupidly have an ESPN+ account through Verizon tacked on automatically against my will.
Then I even miraculously have the ESPN+ log in information properly saved in my iphone and I was able to retrieve it (didn't automatically load for some reason).
I successfully log in, however they want to send a verification code to my email. I refresh my email for about 2-3 minutes and finally lose interest. Just now saw the verification code in my junk mail filter and has since expired and I can't log in.
Still haven't seen it.
Do that actually want anyone to see their website? Not sure they could provide a much worse user experience.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13862
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
Was just a link on X I clicked on.Drj820 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024 11:04very boomer of you to go to espn dot com seeking sports informationBF004 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024 10:59Random rant about ESPN.
So I see Mel Kiper released a new mock draft, I decide to click on the link and check it out. In this day and age in 2024, that is still hidden behind a ESPN+ pay wall.
Now I stupidly have an ESPN+ account through Verizon tacked on automatically against my will.
Then I even miraculously have the ESPN+ log in information properly saved in my iphone and I was able to retrieve it (didn't automatically load for some reason).
I successfully log in, however they want to send a verification code to my email. I refresh my email for about 2-3 minutes and finally lose interest. Just now saw the verification code in my junk mail filter and has since expired and I can't log in.
Still haven't seen it.
Do that actually want anyone to see their website? Not sure they could provide a much worse user experience.
I'm hip enough to scroll through X and even call it X.
I feel like this happens to me constantly as well. That and Roku deciding that I should have to login to all of my apps once per month.BF004 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024 10:59Random rant about ESPN.
So I see Mel Kiper released a new mock draft, I decide to click on the link and check it out. In this day and age in 2024, that is still hidden behind a ESPN+ pay wall.
Now I stupidly have an ESPN+ account through Verizon tacked on automatically against my will.
Then I even miraculously have the ESPN+ log in information properly saved in my iphone and I was able to retrieve it (didn't automatically load for some reason).
I successfully log in, however they want to send a verification code to my email. I refresh my email for about 2-3 minutes and finally lose interest. Just now saw the verification code in my junk mail filter and has since expired and I can't log in.
Still haven't seen it.
Do that actually want anyone to see their website? Not sure they could provide a much worse user experience.
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14462
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
I can't even access ESPN+ even though it's it bundled with Hulu and Disney. I login just fine and then I go back to the article and it asks me to login again... Cleared all site data, cookies, etc... and still nothing... Only bothers me every so often, so don't have the drive to contact them.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
It's tweeterBF004 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024 11:28Was just a link on X I clicked on.Drj820 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024 11:04very boomer of you to go to espn dot com seeking sports informationBF004 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024 10:59Random rant about ESPN.
So I see Mel Kiper released a new mock draft, I decide to click on the link and check it out. In this day and age in 2024, that is still hidden behind a ESPN+ pay wall.
Now I stupidly have an ESPN+ account through Verizon tacked on automatically against my will.
Then I even miraculously have the ESPN+ log in information properly saved in my iphone and I was able to retrieve it (didn't automatically load for some reason).
I successfully log in, however they want to send a verification code to my email. I refresh my email for about 2-3 minutes and finally lose interest. Just now saw the verification code in my junk mail filter and has since expired and I can't log in.
Still haven't seen it.
Do that actually want anyone to see their website? Not sure they could provide a much worse user experience.
I'm hip enough to scroll through X and even call it X.
So you are against the blogger Andy's of the world. But the ESPNs are also "uncool"Drj820 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024 11:04very boomer of you to go to espn dot com seeking sports informationBF004 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024 10:59Random rant about ESPN.
So I see Mel Kiper released a new mock draft, I decide to click on the link and check it out. In this day and age in 2024, that is still hidden behind a ESPN+ pay wall.
Now I stupidly have an ESPN+ account through Verizon tacked on automatically against my will.
Then I even miraculously have the ESPN+ log in information properly saved in my iphone and I was able to retrieve it (didn't automatically load for some reason).
I successfully log in, however they want to send a verification code to my email. I refresh my email for about 2-3 minutes and finally lose interest. Just now saw the verification code in my junk mail filter and has since expired and I can't log in.
Still haven't seen it.
Do that actually want anyone to see their website? Not sure they could provide a much worse user experience.
What is the Drj approved source of information?
packers-huddle dot com, cheesehead tv, sirius xm mad dog sports radio, rich eisen, michael lombardi, matt schneidman, and private sources of the DrJ820go pak go wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024 13:24So you are against the blogger Andy's of the world. But the ESPNs are also "uncool"Drj820 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024 11:04very boomer of you to go to espn dot com seeking sports informationBF004 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2024 10:59Random rant about ESPN.
So I see Mel Kiper released a new mock draft, I decide to click on the link and check it out. In this day and age in 2024, that is still hidden behind a ESPN+ pay wall.
Now I stupidly have an ESPN+ account through Verizon tacked on automatically against my will.
Then I even miraculously have the ESPN+ log in information properly saved in my iphone and I was able to retrieve it (didn't automatically load for some reason).
I successfully log in, however they want to send a verification code to my email. I refresh my email for about 2-3 minutes and finally lose interest. Just now saw the verification code in my junk mail filter and has since expired and I can't log in.
Still haven't seen it.
Do that actually want anyone to see their website? Not sure they could provide a much worse user experience.
What is the Drj approved source of information?
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
so bloggers and Schneidman for local and bloggers and Eisen/Lombardi for national.
I think Eisen is the only "broad" national guy I actually enjoy listening to. Dude's a legend.
I would be really keen to see an analysis from someone with a careful eye to look at these WR contracts and see how inflated they are due to 1st-round draft status. Maybe not drafting a WR in Round 1 has been intentional on the Packers part. Chess, not checkers. If any of our receivers becomes worthy of a long-term extension, there is no 5th-year option to mess with, tons of incentive for player to accept a below market deal earlier to secure guaranteed money. Interesting concept, if nothing else.
Read More. Post Less.