Green Bay Packers News 2022
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14470
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14470
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
- Scott4Pack
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2934
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
- Location: New Mexico
I wouldn’t be ready to sit Aaron Rodgers just yet. But I’m assuming that he can play next weekend too, without too much risk to his own health. If so, I’d let him kill da Bears again, like he’s always done. And then, the remainder of the 5 games can be split with Love or Love can play it all. Just do whatever it takes to create the best “quarterback controversy” for the off season.
;-)
;-)
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!
Starting in 2023 the physical size of the large point totals of the opposition will be bigger...
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14470
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
Christian Watson sets a Packers receiving record of 6 TDs in 3 games and you are seriously b*tching about not drafting George Pickens?
Just imagine if this guy actually learns how to catch with his hands.
The scary part is this dude is so raw and has so much room for growth and improvement.
I think he may quite possibly be the fastest player I have ever seen play the game since Randy Moss. I still can't believe he turned that corner on two athletes to score a TD when they had the angle.
Yeah. I think the offense needed both players. Teams need more than one quality wide receiver these days to win playoff games, ask davante Adams. Both were gettable.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
What is hard to understand. And “bitching” is your terms not mine. I just said that it’s hard to imagine a team in such a desperate spot for a WR would pass on Pickens multiple times.go pak go wrote: ↑28 Nov 2022 20:34So is this a b*tch about drafting Walker or Wyatt?
Like what are you complaining about here?
And to answer your question, I would happily have Pickens on the roster over Wyatt. The team gave up over 300 rushing yards last night.
Imagine a future of Watson, Pickens, Doubs, A Jones, and A Dillon.
That’s mean.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
Anyone bitching about Walker has valid reasons to do so.go pak go wrote: ↑28 Nov 2022 20:34So is this a b*tch about drafting Walker or Wyatt?
Like what are you complaining about here?
Cancelled by the forum elites.
Six months ago you were talking about how Wyatt could’ve been the pick at 22, he was a steal at 28. Now, with the aid of hindsight and a season lost, you’re here “bitching” about the pick.Drj820 wrote: ↑28 Nov 2022 20:37What is hard to understand. And “bitching” is your terms not mine. I just said that it’s hard to imagine a team in such a desperate spot for a WR would pass on Pickens multiple times.
And to answer your question, I would happily have Pickens on the roster over Wyatt. The team gave up over 300 rushing yards last night.
Imagine a future of Watson, Pickens, Doubs, A Jones, and A Dillon.
That’s mean.
You’re being “that guy”. Don’t be that guy.
Conduct better research. These are my first two posts about the packers draft in relation to pick 22. I wanted Pickens before we even went Quay at 22. I was plugging for Pickens all night and assumed the chiefs had moved up to get him when they traded up.APB wrote: ↑28 Nov 2022 21:23Six months ago you were talking about how Wyatt could’ve been the pick at 22, he was a steal at 28. Now, with the aid of hindsight and a season lost, you’re here “bitching” about the pick.Drj820 wrote: ↑28 Nov 2022 20:37What is hard to understand. And “bitching” is your terms not mine. I just said that it’s hard to imagine a team in such a desperate spot for a WR would pass on Pickens multiple times.
And to answer your question, I would happily have Pickens on the roster over Wyatt. The team gave up over 300 rushing yards last night.
Imagine a future of Watson, Pickens, Doubs, A Jones, and A Dillon.
That’s mean.
You’re being “that guy”. Don’t be that guy.
- Attachments
-
- 92822026-E8F1-4CAE-B078-12FE5777BA38.png (1.31 MiB) Viewed 384 times
-
- 2CFDDF6E-77E1-4DEF-B340-82BBD4B3FBEC.png (460.5 KiB) Viewed 384 times
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
Dude.
They’re your own words.
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/viewt ... 512#p94512
They’re your own words.
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/viewt ... 512#p94512
BTW, time to start formulating your new stance on Watson. Based on your screen shot, you didn’t want him either. Apparently. At least not six months ago. Who knows what your stance is now. Probably were pining for him all along…Drj820 wrote: Just off the film, Wyatt continues to look like the guy who could have gone at 22. Certainly looks like a steal at 28.
What is your point? “Just off film” I’m sure Wyatt could have gone at 22. He had a great career at UGA. That doesn’t change the fact at all that on draft night I wanted Pickens, and I still want Pickens and I would love to have Watson and Pickens. On draft night I said I wanted Pickens over Watson. As you can see, I wanted Pickens.APB wrote: ↑28 Nov 2022 21:38Dude.
They’re your own words.
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/viewt ... 512#p94512
Drj820 wrote: Just off the film, Wyatt continues to look like the guy who could have gone at 22. Certainly looks like a steal at 28.
While on draft night Wyatt may have looked like a steal, you know who would have been an even bigger steal? You guessed it…Pickens.
Check my above post for the proof you seek that I was plugging Pickens then, and I’m plugging him now.
You mad because I said I wish we had Watson and Pickens over Wyatt? Lol funny thing to get mad at.
And yes, even today I would prefer Pickens over Watson.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
Pickens has two drops tonight. Just sayin’.Drj820 wrote: ↑28 Nov 2022 21:42What is your point? “Just off film” I’m sure Wyatt could have gone at 22. He had a great career at UGA. That doesn’t change the fact at all that on draft night I wanted Pickens, and I still want Pickens and I would love to have Watson and Pickens. On draft night I said I wanted Pickens over Watson. As you can see, I wanted Pickens.APB wrote: ↑28 Nov 2022 21:38Dude.
They’re your own words.
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/viewt ... 512#p94512
Drj820 wrote: Just off the film, Wyatt continues to look like the guy who could have gone at 22. Certainly looks like a steal at 28.
While on draft night Wyatt may have looked like a steal, you know who would have been an even bigger steal? You guessed it…Pickens.
Check my above post for the proof you seek that I was plugging Pickens then, and I’m plugging him now.
Your point?APB wrote: ↑28 Nov 2022 21:44Pickens has two drops tonight. Just sayin’.Drj820 wrote: ↑28 Nov 2022 21:42What is your point? “Just off film” I’m sure Wyatt could have gone at 22. He had a great career at UGA. That doesn’t change the fact at all that on draft night I wanted Pickens, and I still want Pickens and I would love to have Watson and Pickens. On draft night I said I wanted Pickens over Watson. As you can see, I wanted Pickens.APB wrote: ↑28 Nov 2022 21:38Dude.
They’re your own words.
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/viewt ... 512#p94512
While on draft night Wyatt may have looked like a steal, you know who would have been an even bigger steal? You guessed it…Pickens.
Check my above post for the proof you seek that I was plugging Pickens then, and I’m plugging him now.
My point was I would rather have Watson and Pickens over Wyatt on the roster at the moment. This seemed to make you want to get me in some “gotcha” moment where I said on draft night that Wyatt had good tape. Well, that’s no gotcha because I stand by that..he did have good tape. For me, it was about need. And if you are desperate at WR and have a chance to grab 2 in the early rounds, that was always my vote. You can see the screenshots I posted above for some proof on my stance that hasnt changed.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
You’re out of pocket
All I said was I wish we had George Pickens. I said it tonight, I then showed where I said it on draft night.
Then GPG said I was bitching about having Watson, and I said I would keep Watson at this point and have Pickens, and happily give up Wyatt for that.
I simply answered his questions directly. Also answered yours by providing screenshots of where I wanted Pickens on draft night too.
I’m not seeing the issue other than I just shared an opinion about wishing Pickens was a Green Bay packer.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur