The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
I feel like the Packers, this year more than any in recent history, are a likely candidate to move up in the 1st. Otherwise, they are going to draft outside of their norms. Either way, add this to a year where Gutey goes against the grain (maybe not drastically, but a bit).
QB in R1paco wrote: ↑03 Apr 2024 22:15I feel like the Packers, this year more than any in recent history, are a likely candidate to move up in the 1st. Otherwise, they are going to draft outside of their norms. Either way, add this to a year where Gutey goes against the grain (maybe not drastically, but a bit).
I would honestly be surprised if the Packers make a trade to move up in the first round. Their most pressing needs of adding an off-the-ball linebacker or safety don't align with that approach in my opinion.paco wrote: ↑03 Apr 2024 22:15I feel like the Packers, this year more than any in recent history, are a likely candidate to move up in the 1st. Otherwise, they are going to draft outside of their norms. Either way, add this to a year where Gutey goes against the grain (maybe not drastically, but a bit).
They might be able to use slot 28 and find a better WRBF004 wrote: ↑04 Apr 2024 10:34So what would you say if Buffalo calls and asks about some WRs?
Price points on any of them?
Pretty deep looking class, could restock a bit as well if we’d move one.
However we know we have good players with cheap control for a while. So i am guessing Buffalo just wouldn’t offer enough to make sense for us.
Like it would have to be pick 28 at least for pretty much any of them, right? Buffalo won’t get someone better at 28 than Wicks or Reed and would just have 1 less year of control.
my issue is can we replace whomever we lose with something later then slot 28 or even slot 28? doubtful, so basically we are losing what we perceive as a up and comer for very low value.
I would think they'd see their WR restock potential from the draft the same as you stated for the Packers above. IOW I don't think any of our guys would garner a significant trade investment over what they could get for free in a few weeks.BF004 wrote: ↑04 Apr 2024 10:34So what would you say if Buffalo calls and asks about some WRs?
Price points on any of them?
Pretty deep looking class, could restock a bit as well if we’d move one.
However we know we have good players with cheap control for a while. So i am guessing Buffalo just wouldn’t offer enough to make sense for us.
Like it would have to be pick 28 at least for pretty much any of them, right? Buffalo won’t get someone better at 28 than Wicks or Reed and would just have 1 less year of control.
In my opinion the Packers shouldn't be interested in trading any of their wide receivers for a late first round pick. They know they have a talented group of playmakers and you never know how a prospect works out.BF004 wrote: ↑04 Apr 2024 10:34So what would you say if Buffalo calls and asks about some WRs?
Price points on any of them?
Pretty deep looking class, could restock a bit as well if we’d move one.
However we know we have good players with cheap control for a while. So i am guessing Buffalo just wouldn’t offer enough to make sense for us.
Like it would have to be pick 28 at least for pretty much any of them, right? Buffalo won’t get someone better at 28 than Wicks or Reed and would just have 1 less year of control.
I think it's a year too early to think about any WR trades. You see how they develop, which ones you want to keep and which ones you won't be able to retain... I'm thinking Doubs next year might be a nice little mid-round target. But Wicks-Reed-Watson really feels like the core you want to keep things together.CWIMM wrote: ↑05 Apr 2024 03:46In my opinion the Packers shouldn't be interested in trading any of their wide receivers for a late first round pick. They know they have a talented group of playmakers and you never know how a prospect works out.BF004 wrote: ↑04 Apr 2024 10:34So what would you say if Buffalo calls and asks about some WRs?
Price points on any of them?
Pretty deep looking class, could restock a bit as well if we’d move one.
However we know we have good players with cheap control for a while. So i am guessing Buffalo just wouldn’t offer enough to make sense for us.
Like it would have to be pick 28 at least for pretty much any of them, right? Buffalo won’t get someone better at 28 than Wicks or Reed and would just have 1 less year of control.
I don't believe Doubs would garner much interest in a trade. That would most likely be true for every wide receiver the Packers deem to expendable anyway.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑05 Apr 2024 10:48I think it's a year too early to think about any WR trades. You see how they develop, which ones you want to keep and which ones you won't be able to retain... I'm thinking Doubs next year might be a nice little mid-round target. But Wicks-Reed-Watson really feels like the core you want to keep things together.
At least King is being given another chance. Frankly my dear I don't really give a damn.
I had absolutely no idea King is still in the league
