Yoop wrote: ↑23 Aug 2020 09:57
go pak go wrote: ↑23 Aug 2020 09:35
Yoop wrote: ↑23 Aug 2020 09:33
thats cause you like your ears tickled and not scratched
in the very beginning of Bob McGinns run everyone loved him, when he started taking the team to task over goof ball decisions, not so much, obviously we have more faith in team then we do beat writers, imo the team abused that a lot during the post Lombardi era for about 2 decades, just saying, sometimes when our ears itch, we should take notice
don't go scratching your head
when Bobby says something you don't like even though it's balls on accurate you disparage him just like most of the others here, he complained about the lack of receivers through the years, and D Jones was a crap pick and there are countless other times, to me McCginn was one of the best beat writers we could have had, but because he wont sugar coat his comments fans hate him, I'd rather be told a honest opinion, then to have people always telling me what I want to hear, however I was mostly kidding around, and my post wasn't really directed at anyone in general.
Oh you're talking about McGinn?
I don't dislike McGinn because he says our players stink. I have never disliked anyone because they talk down on the Packers when it's real. I do dislike someone when they are essentially always pessemists because by and large this franchise has been awesome.
What I honestly don't really like about McGinn is he takes 2 or 3 very short, brief and high level quotes from "scouts" and uses that as his basis on if a player is good or not. I prefer to have a bit more analysis.
And that is also a generational thing. McGinn comes from the newspaper hard print era. Words and space were limited. Information was limited.
We now live in a completely different era and the world has just passed him.
I appreciate what the beat boys do. They are the ones who get the quotes. They are the ones with the most access and they are the ones trying to honestly bring attention and excitement to the game. But because of this last part especially, they are the ones who largely also push a narrative too hard such as "quarterback controversy" or "is Rodgers mad?" or "let's have 26 repeat tweets of who is sitting out of practice today"
They are too much about newspaper headings. I like "non-beat" guys like Nagler was, Herman was (and honestly still is) and others because they actually analyze, summarize and teach about the game (if they are good). The problem is that is really hard to do and the other problem is your following is pretty limited because only a small segment of the fans actually care about non-headline stuff.
But you do realize you are a homer too right? Your homerism of Rodgers is also an ear tickling or ear scratching whatever thing.
And finally, I also do have a problem with, "oh such and such position is a weak spot! I am going to complain about this for the whole year and that must be our sole purpose to fix next offseason".