Page 16 of 26

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:34
by Labrev
Need a FG and TD from the O (minimum), order doesn't matter, and a stop on D, entirely doable.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:34
by Pckfn23
Oh ya, hugging a guy can't be PI...

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:34
by williewasgreat
Watson slows up during his route.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:35
by wallyuwl
Was giving him a bear hug and no pi

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:35
by lupedafiasco
Watson really does remind me of MVS. He can’t track a ball over his shoulder for &%$@.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:35
by German_Panzer
Titans show what happens when we play a competent team. Bye postseason.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:35
by BF004
3 and out, just what we needed.


Not a very good throw to Watson.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:36
by Pckfn23
Oh $%@# stop it. No one can track the ball when they are being hugged.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:36
by BF004
lupedafiasco wrote:
17 Nov 2022 21:35
Watson really does remind me of MVS. He can’t track a ball over his shoulder for &%$@.
That wasn’t a very good throw.

Either way, I think that should have been PI.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:36
by lupedafiasco
williewasgreat wrote:
17 Nov 2022 21:34
Watson slows up during his route.
He didn’t track it well. If he tracks the ball better that’s PI for sure. He made it look uncatchable and that’s why it wasn’t called.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:37
by Pckfn23
He made it look uncatchable??? It almost hit him!! :messedup:

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:37
by Labrev
Annnnnnnnnd they blew it. :bkw:

Barring a very opportune turnover or something, they blew it with that 3-and-out.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:38
by BF004
Labrev wrote:
17 Nov 2022 21:37
Annnnnnnnnd they blew it. :bkw:

Barring a very opportune turnover or something, they blew it with that 3-and-out.
Said the same, gotta play perfect and need some luck.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:38
by Pckfn23
Anyone know off hand, have we won a game we have not outright won the TO battle?

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:39
by APB
lupedafiasco wrote:
17 Nov 2022 21:36
williewasgreat wrote:
17 Nov 2022 21:34
Watson slows up during his route.
He didn’t track it well. If he tracks the ball better that’s PI for sure. He made it look uncatchable and that’s why it wasn’t called.
I agree with you that Watson doesn’t track those balls well but this “uncatchable” thing is way off. It hit him in the arm ffs

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:40
by Cdragon
wallyuwl wrote:
17 Nov 2022 21:35
Was giving him a bear hug and no pi
Refs want to get out of the cold.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:40
by Pckfn23
Garvin, nice play on the run stop.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:40
by Pugger
williewasgreat wrote:
17 Nov 2022 21:34
Watson slows up during his route.
That wasn't the 1st time Watson has done that.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:40
by paco
Good play or 2, then a breakdown. Joe Barry D.

Re: Titans @ Packers GDT: Thursday, Nov. 17th, 7:15 PM CST

Posted: 17 Nov 2022 21:40
by BF004
Just zero pressure since we lost Gary.

Where Kenny and Preston at there?