The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
Ok I’ll shut up now. Well I’m basically not excited for anyone in the rest of this class. I guess I want Walter Nolan. Probably shouldn’t have said that.paco wrote: ↑24 Apr 2025 20:21lupedafiasco wrote: ↑24 Apr 2025 20:19Didn’t think Loveland would go in the 1st. Pushes one down for us. Starting to get close to move up territory for Mykell Williams.
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑14 Apr 2025 10:21This is so silly. Having round-by-round MUSTS is the best way to absolutely ensure that you will spend draft weekend angry and disappointed. I get what you mean. I have tons of trouble this year finding EDGE sleepers and pass rush outside of the early rounds. But there are dozens of ways to arrange a draft class that fits our needs. Not just one.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025 18:31The more I do these mocks or look at other mocks o think the Packers strategy in this draft is pretty clear.
R1 you have to take a DT or Edge. Doesn’t really matter which but I would lean DT because it’s deeper in the 1st round and thins out a little later.
R2 you have to get a WR. After the 2nd unless we plan to move up in the 3rd a lot of players that are ready now are gone. If you don’t come out of the first 2 rounds with a WR you are playing a very dangerous game at the position that desperately needs some who can consistently win against DBs.
R3 you just take what you didn’t in the 1st at either DT or Edge. I think Edge here actually has a lot of talent. You probably don’t get a dominant every down Edge but you can get some pass rush productivity with one of the tweeners or take a swing at one of the size/weight freaks. At DT there is still talent that’s fallen because of how deep the position is in the first two rounds.
From there you can just lean into BPA when trying to fill out the depth of this team at CB, LB, and OL.
So who are you hoping for at this point? I am just signing on so haven't looked back at the thread much
Strange self quote.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑24 Apr 2025 21:05YoHoChecko wrote: ↑14 Apr 2025 10:21This is so silly. Having round-by-round MUSTS is the best way to absolutely ensure that you will spend draft weekend angry and disappointed. I get what you mean. I have tons of trouble this year finding EDGE sleepers and pass rush outside of the early rounds. But there are dozens of ways to arrange a draft class that fits our needs. Not just one.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025 18:31The more I do these mocks or look at other mocks o think the Packers strategy in this draft is pretty clear.
R1 you have to take a DT or Edge. Doesn’t really matter which but I would lean DT because it’s deeper in the 1st round and thins out a little later.
R2 you have to get a WR. After the 2nd unless we plan to move up in the 3rd a lot of players that are ready now are gone. If you don’t come out of the first 2 rounds with a WR you are playing a very dangerous game at the position that desperately needs some who can consistently win against DBs.
R3 you just take what you didn’t in the 1st at either DT or Edge. I think Edge here actually has a lot of talent. You probably don’t get a dominant every down Edge but you can get some pass rush productivity with one of the tweeners or take a swing at one of the size/weight freaks. At DT there is still talent that’s fallen because of how deep the position is in the first two rounds.
From there you can just lean into BPA when trying to fill out the depth of this team at CB, LB, and OL.
Pretty much in on Harmon, Golden, or Campbell. Thought we would have no shot at Golden after the Campbell lets you let Quay Walker walk a year from now and rectifies taking a 3rd round prospect in the 1st round a few years ago. Harmon to me offers so much flexibility at DT because he can play NT or 3T.