Page 17 of 25

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:06
by Crazylegs Starks
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:05
Reed could have played better defense but let’s not pretend that was a remotely good pass.
No way, the defender never even saw the ball until Reed gifted it to him. I guarantee Love will get a positive grade from the coaches on that one.

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:06
by go pak go
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:05
Reed could have played better defense but let’s not pretend that was a remotely good pass.
Wasn't great. Wasn't bad.

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:06
by Pckfn23
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:05
Reed could have played better defense but let’s not pretend that was a remotely good pass.
It sure as hell wasn't a bad pass.

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:07
by BF004
Would have been an amazing pass from Rodgers and bum sauce receivers from gutenbumst and Lafleur is a beta and something about Murphy too.

Change my mind.

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:08
by musclestang
Pckfn23 wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:06
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:05
Reed could have played better defense but let’s not pretend that was a remotely good pass.
It sure as hell wasn't a bad pass.
It sure as hell wasn’t good.

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:08
by lupedafiasco
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:05
Reed could have played better defense but let’s not pretend that was a remotely good pass.
I don’t think there’s any convincing this crowd.

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:08
by Labrev
Love has exposed that Lupe does not know anything about football.

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:08
by salmar80
go pak go wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:06
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:05
Reed could have played better defense but let’s not pretend that was a remotely good pass.
Wasn't great. Wasn't bad.
It was a risky pass over the middle, but the WR had a winning position and I expect them to catch that.

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:09
by schuld66
paco wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:03
Harrison Jr?
I was wondering when the first MH Jr post would happen. I was thinking it about an hour ago. Who are the Packers going to beat -- maybe the Panthers, or possibly Giants?

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:09
by Pckfn23
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:08
Pckfn23 wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:06
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:05
Reed could have played better defense but let’s not pretend that was a remotely good pass.
It sure as hell wasn't a bad pass.
It sure as hell wasn’t good.
Pretty decent actually. It was put where it had to be.

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:10
by Pckfn23
lupedafiasco wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:08
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:05
Reed could have played better defense but let’s not pretend that was a remotely good pass.
I don’t think there’s any convincing this crowd.
Just stop trying to gaslight everyone and you will be fine.

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:10
by musclestang
Crazylegs Starks wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:06
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:05
Reed could have played better defense but let’s not pretend that was a remotely good pass.
No way, the defender never even saw the ball until Reed gifted it to him. I guarantee Love will get a positive grade from the coaches on that one.
The defender got extremely lucky. Didn’t say it was great defense. But if the defender can basically stand there like a dummy and the WR has to work over the top and back behind him to make a catch, it’s not a good pass.

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:10
by musclestang
Pckfn23 wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:10
lupedafiasco wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:08
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:05
Reed could have played better defense but let’s not pretend that was a remotely good pass.
I don’t think there’s any convincing this crowd.
Just stop trying to gaslight everyone and you will be fine.
Oh, ok

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:11
by go pak go
BF004 wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:07
Would have been an amazing pass from Rodgers and bum sauce receivers from gutenbumst and Lafleur is a beta and something about Murphy too.

Change my mind.
Oh you mean Lupe's exact rant on the Rodgers INT to Lazard in the NFCCG when Tonyan was wide open on the other side?

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:11
by Cdragon
Dillon is down. :twisted:

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:12
by Crazylegs Starks
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:10
Crazylegs Starks wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:06
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:05
Reed could have played better defense but let’s not pretend that was a remotely good pass.
No way, the defender never even saw the ball until Reed gifted it to him. I guarantee Love will get a positive grade from the coaches on that one.
The defender got extremely lucky. Didn’t say it was great defense. But if the defender can basically stand there like a dummy and the WR has to work over the top and back behind him to make a catch, it’s not a good pass.
Seriously? When the underneath defender isn't even looking, and there's a safety over the top, you don't want the QB to throw it right there??? :messedup:

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:12
by Labrev
schuld66 wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:09
paco wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:03
Harrison Jr?
I was wondering when the first MH Jr post would happen. I was thinking it about an hour ago. Who are the Packers going to beat -- maybe the Panthers, or possibly Giants?
I said it last week. Of all people to argue against me was the guy who is notorious for kvetching about our lack of WRs.

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:13
by Gunzaan
salmar80 wrote:
29 Oct 2023 13:40
I thought Alan Wake II would be the scariest game to come out this week, but this here game is pure horror.
Perfect 👍

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:13
by Pckfn23
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:10
Crazylegs Starks wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:06
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:05
Reed could have played better defense but let’s not pretend that was a remotely good pass.
No way, the defender never even saw the ball until Reed gifted it to him. I guarantee Love will get a positive grade from the coaches on that one.
The defender got extremely lucky. Didn’t say it was great defense. But if the defender can basically stand there like a dummy and the WR has to work over the top and back behind him to make a catch, it’s not a good pass.
Not what happened on the play. The LB was carrying Reed to his right. The safety was closing from over the top and to Reeds left. Love put the ball on the back of Reeds left shoulder. Reed turned and dropped the ball right into the arms of the LB.

Re: Vikings at Packers GDT: Sunday Oct 29th, 12:00pm CST

Posted: 29 Oct 2023 14:13
by go pak go
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:10
Crazylegs Starks wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:06
musclestang wrote:
29 Oct 2023 14:05
Reed could have played better defense but let’s not pretend that was a remotely good pass.
No way, the defender never even saw the ball until Reed gifted it to him. I guarantee Love will get a positive grade from the coaches on that one.
The defender got extremely lucky. Didn’t say it was great defense. But if the defender can basically stand there like a dummy and the WR has to work over the top and back behind him to make a catch, it’s not a good pass.
It had to be underthrown. Couldn't lead Reed because of the safety over the top. Probably could have been a yard further.