Week 3 games
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
OMG THE REFS CALL LEVERAGE ON A FG ATTEMPT AND THE RAIDERS KEEP THE DRIVE ALIVE
Can't really tell what's happening, but the rules guy says it's a legit foul (and he said Fitzpatrick's was a bad call, so i trust him)
Can't really tell what's happening, but the rules guy says it's a legit foul (and he said Fitzpatrick's was a bad call, so i trust him)
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
That was another incredibly ticky-tack call on Pittsburgh. That “leverage” occurs on damn near every FG attempt.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
I admit I’m no expert on the “analytics” decisions but I do not understand kicking the FG there.
Yeah, ended up helping the Steelers. Weird.YoHoChecko wrote: Ended up making no difference except cost the Raiders more time
Good thing they kicked that FG with 2 minutes left. They lost…better.
3 things I knew coming into this season (and so should've everyone else)....
Josh McDaniels is overrated.
Sean Payton is overrated.
Russell Wilson will never again be the answer (even if it isn't all his fault)
Josh McDaniels is overrated.
Sean Payton is overrated.
Russell Wilson will never again be the answer (even if it isn't all his fault)
RIP JustJeff
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
Patrick Peterson on the postgame show talking about how at this stage in his career he's focusing on having fun and without missing a beat a tv guy says "yeah but you gave up two TDs last week"
I died.
I died.
Alan Lazard he is not…
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
I actually got to thinking about it and remember the logic behind it now.
Playing for 8 points is playing for a tie. Playing for 2 scores is playing for a win. I'll explain further.
(YoHo's note: I still prefer going for it, but it's more of a toss-up than I realized at first)
The scenario: It's 4th and 4 inside the ten, you're down 8. There's 2:20 or so left in the game and you have three time outs.
Ok, so let's play out the two scenarios in terms of what it takes to win the game from the point the decision is made:
If you Go for It, here's what you need to win the game:
- convert 4th and 4 successfully (single attempt point of failure)
- score a TD, perhaps on 4th and 4, perhaps on a subsequent play
- convert the 2-point conversion (single attempt point of failure)
- get a defensive stop to prevent an opposing FG/score in the final 2 minutes of the game
At this point you head to Overtime. You are subject to a coin toss which notably impacts the odds of winning. Regardless you still need:
- a score
- a defensive stop (likely, unless you win the toss and score a TD on the first drive)
If you Kick the FG, here's what you need to win the game:
- make the FG (single attempt point of failure, high likelihood)
- Get a 3 & out defensive stop
- Score a TD on the next drive
While the odds of getting a 3 & out and scoring a TD on the next drive may in fact be lower than the odds of going the other way (I'm not sure how it breaks down mathematically), kicking the FG gives you a much cleaner, clearer, simpler path to VICTORY (not a tie) than going for it on 4th and 4--and reduces the single-play point of failure.
Not to mention if you fail to convert the 4th and 4 or the 2-point conversion, you're left needing a 3 & out and an additional score anyway, just to tie, which is the same thing you need after the FG to win.
Again, I think the math is probably 60/40 or 55/45 toward going for it, if I had to guess (/if I recall from when MLF did this). But the path to victory rather than a tie is much more well-known. It's an information advantage of knowing exactly what you need and a reduction of variables involved. Similar to how Waldron's article APB posted in our post-game thread points out that going for 2 the first time gives you an informational advantage for the second score (but the math on that is a lot more obvious and cleaner than the math on this)
So yeah, the FG is a weird call; but not an indefensible one.
Both of these HCs looked like morons.APB wrote: ↑24 Sep 2023 16:03Yeah, caught the end.Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑24 Sep 2023 15:18Vikings just lost a heart breaker 28-24. Cousins' pass got tipped twice and picked in the end zone.
Staley has no business being a HC. The Chargers won despite his idiotic decisions.
We were watching NFL Red Zone and couldn't believe the way the Cards beat the girls. Very nice indeed.
That sentiment was the talk over on FF big time. lolYoHoChecko wrote: ↑24 Sep 2023 20:05Remember when everyone kept insisting that Rodgers would go to Denver because their roster was Super Bowl ready aside from the QB and I was like "huh? What are you guys talking about? Their roster seems... fine? I guess " and they've been bottom ten in the NFL for a year and a half now?
I wonder if he is regretting his decision to go to Vegas now?
Nah it's cool, Adams is closer to family.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
I'd like to see a point of emphasis on no forward motion before the snap. It's technically a penalty but a lot of motion guys really push the limit.
No, not push the line. Break the rule. A ton of guys break the rule. And it bothers me. Just saw it by Cade Otten. Davante used to get away with it a lot for us. Didn't watch much of Miami, but I bet they have a ton of that, too
No, not push the line. Break the rule. A ton of guys break the rule. And it bothers me. Just saw it by Cade Otten. Davante used to get away with it a lot for us. Didn't watch much of Miami, but I bet they have a ton of that, too