Packers Huddle

lupedafiasco wrote: ↑

02 Nov 2023 19:44

If they took an alive pass rusher this year it would be such a massive waste of resources. You locked up your current top guy. You just drafted one with a top 16 pick. You have 2 good rotational players at the position in Enagbare and Cox. They definitely need to come off the Preston deal and cut him.

MY_TAKE wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023 15:02

We can barely complete a quick slant for gods sake. Thats all QB and WR's in my book.

Just my simple opinion but with this current team, Rodgers or Favre would have hung 30 on the broncos yesterday IN THEIR SLEEP.

IF these recievers can run routes, why does it look so FCUKED up, half the time. Who is to blame?. I am going MLF.

MY eye test tells me Doubs has a better chance than Watson to be really good. To me, Watson is flawed.

BF004 wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023 16:30

Which horrible teams wouldn’t take QB’s?

Looking at Bears x2, Broncos, Raiders, Patriots, Giants, Cardinals, Vikings, Falcons, Titans, Commanders

Broncos and Giants really can’t move off their current QBs for like two more years, so drafting a clear backup.

Other than that. I would imagine every one of those teams would take Maye or Williams if they are in range in the top 3.

TheSkeptic wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2023 04:44

I am not in favor of drafting a QB in the 1st or 2nd round.

Draft a LT in the first and if there is not a LT worth the slot, trade down and take a LT later in the first. Spend the 2nd round picks on a guard and a safety.

You can point at pressure stats but that does not matter as much as what Love is thinking. Love is playing scared, just as Rodgers played scared in the playoff games when Bakh was out. Any QB with a poor LT is going to hear footsteps, even when the replacement LT gets lucky and stops his man. It only takes 1 blindside hit that snaps your head back and distorts your spine - you will remember that for weeks.

RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2023 17:57

Since you want to talk about 2024 already ....

If the season ended today here's who'd be coming to Lambeau in 2024:

Lions, Vikings, Bears, Cardinals, 49ers, Texans, Colts, Buccaneers and the freakin' effen J-E-T-S Jets Jets Jets.

Guess which game will be a prime time evening game.

lupedafiasco wrote: ↑

02 Nov 2023 19:44

Foosball wrote: ↑

02 Nov 2023 17:49

Labrev wrote: ↑

02 Nov 2023 15:40

Gary, Enagbare, LVN (as a project), Wyatt, Brooks, Wooden... that's a nice set of guys who can get after the QB.

One thing I would not mind that I think is lacking on this team are off-ball LBers that have blitz skills. It doesn't even have to be a stud LB; it can be a rotational backup one-trick pony kind of guy who's there almost solely for that (some ST value too to justify their roster spot).

Otherwise no, I would not prioritize pass-rushers in the draft. I would prioritize beefing up the trenches on O and adding playmakers.

One more comment and I’ll let it go. When Gary was injured last year, the Packers pass rush disappeared. If an elite pass rusher is available, I would jump at the chance to draft him and I hope the Packers will too.

If they took an alive pass rusher this year it would be such a massive waste of resources. You locked up your current top guy. You just drafted one with a top 16 pick. You have 2 good rotational players at the position in Enagbare and Cox. They definitely need to come off the Preston deal and cut him.

All that said the Packers need to change their philosophy. It’s paramount to get value out of rookie deals right now. Your star players and big contacts need to be just that but if you get pro bowl caliber talent on just a couple million in cap space you are at a colossal advantage.