Re: Packers @ Steelers GDT: Sunday, Nov. 12th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 10 Nov 2023 12:15
The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
I think sports news media people direct conversations and opinions in the direction they themselves feel strongly about, and all the talk has been lately that Lafleurs scheme designs are to complicated for rookies, people here say it, as well as media, to me that is mostly over blown hype.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2023 10:47And what experience do you have to form that opinion? Do you or any of us here have any experience in an NFL offense? I tend to take the opinion of a guy who has experienced a few of them over anyone here, including myself.
Who thinks that? Who has said they are?again when people think schemes are easy to adjust to fit any situation I disagree, I believe during the season, even bye week off it's much harder to accomplish then people realize.
Go watch it again, that isn't just what Sternberger is talking about. He is talking about the small details too and that not all offenses require the attention to detail that LaFluer's system does. For example he specifically mentions the exact yardage of a route outside the numbers and how they need to also be aware of the other routes that are being run. Are you saying that Sternberger is not being truthful in recounting his experiences in Green Bay, Pittsburgh, and Buffalo?Yoop wrote: ↑10 Nov 2023 13:01we have for many years route design where (back to most of McCarthy's years had route variances) the receiver has a choice of breaking in or out depending on defender post snap adjustments.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2023 10:47And what experience do you have to form that opinion? Do you or any of us here have any experience in an NFL offense? I tend to take the opinion of a guy who has experienced a few of them over anyone here, including myself.
Who thinks that? Who has said they are?again when people think schemes are easy to adjust to fit any situation I disagree, I believe during the season, even bye week off it's much harder to accomplish then people realize.
that stuff is as old as the hills
of course he was, but thats not what I was trying to convey, his point, if I understand it right, was to say Lafleurs pass schemes are to complicated, my point is, there not much different then the schemes used across the league.
never said he was a media guy, maybe re read what I said, and every receiver has to know what you just described, and of the 3 teams two then are complicated and only Pittsburg runs a HS scheme.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2023 13:13Go watch it again, that isn't just what Sternberger is talking about. He is talking about the small details too and that not all offenses require the attention to detail that LaFluer's system does. For example he specifically mentions the exact yardage of a route outside the numbers and how they need to also be aware of the other routes that are being run. Are you saying that Sternberger is not being truthful in recounting his experiences in Green Bay, Pittsburgh, and Buffalo?
Jace Sternberger isn't a media guy, FYI. He is a player with real experiences in NFL offenses recounting those first hand experiences.
In the Packer offense, yes, the receivers do need to know those things. In the Pittsburgh offense, it doesn't revolve around those small details.and every receiver has to know what you just described, and of the 3 teams two then are complicated and only Pittsburg runs a HS scheme.
I didn't talk about rookies. I never even typed that word.also you don't know that Lafleur requires his rookie receivers to know every route, that was a McCarthy and Rodgers thing, course to be able to move receivers around it's obviously necessary.
You have no basis for that belief. There is just no reason to not believe what Jace Sternberger is saying. Again, though, you aren't understanding the actual details that Sternberger is talking about. He is talking about much more than just different routes for coverage and routes are certain yards. Again, why don't you believe what Jace is saying when he says the Packer offense is more detail oriented?I'am saying that Sternburger was probably led into some of the comments he made from Butkowski, what receivers coaches don't expect exact yardage to break or catch points? how is a QB suppose to know where to throw the ball?
What article? There isn't an article. That leads me to believe you didn't even watch the video. That and there was no blame at all in the video. Ya, I don't think you watched it.again the whole point of that article was to shift blame from the receivers over to Lafleur, no sale.
then why did Butkowski interview a past player concerning the pass routes Lafleur uses? of course he led Sterno in the direction he wanted Stern to talk about.
so again, your calling me a liar, watching it is what convinced me that Butkowski was attempting to lay blame at the feet of Lafleur, I bet he dial up ten ex packer receivers before he found one to spout the nonsense that Sternberger did.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2023 13:31In the Packer offense, yes, the receivers do need to know those things. In the Pittsburgh offense, it doesn't revolve around those small details.and every receiver has to know what you just described, and of the 3 teams two then are complicated and only Pittsburg runs a HS scheme.
I didn't talk about rookies. I never even typed that word.also you don't know that Lafleur requires his rookie receivers to know every route, that was a McCarthy and Rodgers thing, course to be able to move receivers around it's obviously necessary.
You have no basis for that belief. There is just no reason to not believe what Jace Sternberger is saying. Again, though, you aren't understanding the actual details that Sternberger is talking about. He is talking about much more than just different routes for coverage and routes are certain yards. Again, why don't you believe what Jace is saying when he says the Packer offense is more detail oriented?I'am saying that Sternburger was probably led into some of the comments he made from Butkowski, what receivers coaches don't expect exact yardage to break or catch points? how is a QB suppose to know where to throw the ball?
What article? There isn't an article. That leads me to believe you didn't even watch the video. That and there was no blame at all in the video. Ya, I don't think you watched it.again the whole point of that article was to shift blame from the receivers over to Lafleur, no sale.
He didn't interview him about that... They were talking about the differences in the Packers and Pittsburgh offenses.
He didn't talk about that. You may want to actually go watch the video.23 I have trouble accepting almost everything Stern said, route combo's, route depths are as old as I'am for cripe sakes, and if ya dial stuff back with singular route designs, don't you think DC's will catch on to that in a NY minute, of course they will.
You are free to think what you like, but you are wrong.No, this was basically a interview to paint Lafleur as to complicated, and to defend these poor rookie receivers, that you and others agree, ehhh, just can't get on board, sorry.
Bukowski says 3 words in the entire 210 second clip.
I know BS when I hear it, we had to know how to read a DB to win leverage, had to know depth of brake and catch points 60 years ago, now according to a TE thats never held a job over 2 seasons since we cut him, that this stuff isn't expected to be known as a rookie nfl receiver, come on
The narrative you are pushing that Bukowski is calling up 10 former Packers to get the "Juice" against MLF when the actual interview was nothing but positive to MLF (he literally said he kept MLF's playbook as a resource for when Sternberger will be a coach one day) is rational?