Thanks for highlighting this. I had actually asked you in another thread a moment ago if you knew any of the details behind how GB would guarantee the money. It seems that some of it becomes guaranteed later, after a period of performance. At least that's how I understand it, from the little that I've heard.
Training Camp - Day 1
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- Scott4Pack
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2934
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
- Location: New Mexico
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!
Quite literally no advantage to the Packers that Love wasn't on the field. If Love got a career ending injury before a massive contract got signed....that would be called doding a bullet.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑28 Jul 2024 14:46Simple. If the front office felt that keeping him off the field would be to their advantage, they'd do it. I'm not saying there's a large number of scenarios where that would be the case. But they were negotiating too.go pak go wrote: ↑22 Jul 2024 20:18Your statement makes no sense. Why would the Packers keep him off the field? The Packers have no reason to keep him off the field. He is under contract.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑22 Jul 2024 18:34
And the team is just as likely to keep him off the field until a deal is finished. Two parts...
Want an example? Bak gets a career ender 5 weeks after he signed a massive contract. Don't you think the Packers would have rather had the injury before the contract signing?
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1371
- Joined: 28 Aug 2023 08:42
I have to believe the team would have rather had Love on the field, but were respectful and confident enough the deal would get done quickly so they didn't really say anything that wasn't positive about it.