Page 3 of 10
Re: OTAs
Posted: 25 May 2021 14:55
by Yoop
go pak go wrote: ↑25 May 2021 14:34
Yoop wrote: ↑25 May 2021 14:22
go pak go wrote: ↑25 May 2021 13:54
I'm sick and tired of these nfl teams treating players like objects and being able to trade them whenever they want.
The Packers gave Patrick a contract. Why give Patrick a contract if they didn't intend on letting Patrick play out at that contract?
good point, but it's not really the same thing
OK then keep Patrick, your right, I'am wrong, we should keep every contracted player no matter if they can't win a starting job with us or not
So is your 6 months worth of union talk all about really just catering to Rodgers then because you have an obsessive emotional attachment to him?
Because it is starting to seem to me you could care less about other players and their contracts.
Literally. If there is anyone who should be protected from this stuff it is players like Lucas Patrick who could use the financial protections of being in a union to get a good deal that secures he can have a living by making it to the top league in professional sports.
Rodgers is my HERO, and you can be sure I care more about him then Patrick, don't you?
I don't want to derail this thread, long story short I believe in seniority, so obviously that means I care about established vets over a 2 year player that really hasn't won a starting spot.
no one protects non vested workers, unless you work and have a in house union that protects all the workers far to much as in a car plant, newbies have to work hard and become a vested employee.
Re: OTAs
Posted: 25 May 2021 16:23
by Acrobat
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑25 May 2021 13:34
I am baffled by the KaDar Hollman, Stanford Samuels absences
Like it looks like Alexander’s absence might have had some thinking the CBs were joining the WRs in protest. But guys like Josh Jackson and Kabion Ento were like “uh, nah, I gotta try to win a job”
Same with EQ and to an extent Funchess. Like y’all ain’t got that kind of leeway.
I think Stanford Samuels has done enough to earn sitting OTA's out.
Re: OTAs
Posted: 25 May 2021 16:37
by Trudge
Re: OTAs
Posted: 25 May 2021 17:00
by Cdragon
paco wrote: ↑25 May 2021 11:51
He looks glacial out there try him at swing tackle.
Re: OTAs
Posted: 25 May 2021 17:50
by NCF
Re: OTAs
Posted: 25 May 2021 19:36
by APB
Those AJ Dillon pics next to Jones...good lawd! That is one full grown man!
Tips glass to JustJeff
Re: OTAs
Posted: 25 May 2021 20:01
by APB
I’m about ready to write off Funchess. Dude has no business not attending OTAs regardless of any sort of solidarity he feels with teammates he’s never actually played with. And if it has nothing to do with aligning with Rodgers or Adams and their ongoing organizational tiffs, then why the $%@# are you not there??
Re: OTAs
Posted: 25 May 2021 21:32
by TheSkeptic
Y'all still think there is no chance Jenkins is an OT now?
Re: OTAs
Posted: 25 May 2021 21:56
by Trudge
TheSkeptic wrote: ↑25 May 2021 21:32
Y'all still think there is no chance Jenkins is an OT now?
Nah.
Re: OTAs
Posted: 25 May 2021 22:41
by lupedafiasco
Drj820 wrote: ↑25 May 2021 12:54
NCF wrote: ↑25 May 2021 11:47
paco wrote: ↑25 May 2021 11:41
Too bad on the middle-of-the-depth chart guys.
Funchess should be there
Ive been telling yall. This guy doesnt care. He playts football because hes built for it, not because he wants to. Just another Eddie Lacy. Waste of talent.
Or do yall wanna tell me this is family related too?
Re: OTAs
Posted: 25 May 2021 22:42
by Drj820
I’d go ahead and give ESB and Funchess agents a call and tell them there services are no longer needed. Bums.
Re: OTAs
Posted: 25 May 2021 22:51
by YoHoChecko
I mean, I find some of the absences a bit puzzling and frustrating, but you can't cut guys for not showing up to voluntary workouts. Like literally it's not allowed. They'd get in some trouble if they tried.
Re: OTAs
Posted: 25 May 2021 23:19
by Drj820
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑25 May 2021 22:51
I mean, I find some of the absences a bit puzzling and frustrating, but you can't cut guys for not showing up to voluntary workouts. Like literally it's not allowed. They'd get in some trouble if they tried.
I would put a sticky note on my desk to remind me to do it after camp
Re: OTAs
Posted: 26 May 2021 19:29
by Pckfn23
$%@# Yeah! Let's go!!
Re: OTAs
Posted: 27 May 2021 05:04
by Pugger
paco wrote: ↑25 May 2021 11:55
Rehab? What's wrong with Bortles?
Re: OTAs
Posted: 27 May 2021 05:38
by paco
Pugger wrote: ↑27 May 2021 05:04
paco wrote: ↑25 May 2021 11:55
Rehab? What's wrong with Bortles?
LaFleur didn't say. Just mentioned something about bringing him along slowly and he'll be in there soon.
Re: OTAs
Posted: 27 May 2021 07:58
by Waldo
I see there's an article from Demovsky pumping up Love's OTA performance
https://www.espn.com/blog/green-bay-pac ... _/id/50880
Re: OTAs
Posted: 27 May 2021 08:33
by BF004
TheSkeptic wrote: ↑25 May 2021 21:32
Y'all still think there is no chance Jenkins is an OT now?
Not really no. Maybe looking at him to be top backup LT possible beginning of the year starter.
Just no reason with Bak and Turner on roster and under contract for 2 more years.
Re: OTAs
Posted: 27 May 2021 08:39
by TheSkeptic
BF004 wrote: ↑27 May 2021 08:33
TheSkeptic wrote: ↑25 May 2021 21:32
Y'all still think there is no chance Jenkins is an OT now?
Not really no. Maybe looking at him to be top backup LT possible beginning of the year starter.
Just no reason with Bak and Turner on roster and under contract for 2 more years.
I really don't understand why people think Turner is any good. I understand 1 year of good stats and a career of bad stats. But I see what I see and that a TE or a RB is always helping Turner. Stats look a lot better when you always have a TE to chip your man or the RB is prepared to help and therefore does not see the blitzing LB until it is too late.
Re: OTAs
Posted: 27 May 2021 08:48
by Drj820
TheSkeptic wrote: ↑27 May 2021 08:39
BF004 wrote: ↑27 May 2021 08:33
TheSkeptic wrote: ↑25 May 2021 21:32
Y'all still think there is no chance Jenkins is an OT now?
Not really no. Maybe looking at him to be top backup LT possible beginning of the year starter.
Just no reason with Bak and Turner on roster and under contract for 2 more years.
I really don't understand why people think Turner is any good. I understand 1 year of good stats and a career of bad stats. But I see what I see and that a TE or a RB is always helping Turner. Stats look a lot better when you always have a TE to chip your man or the RB is prepared to help and therefore does not see the blitzing LB until it is too late.
We have a million guards now, I don’t see any reason why our best healthy linemen wouldn’t be considered to be moved out to OT if that is the position we are thinnest at on the line.
