Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST

[Pckfn23]

[Pckfn23]

[Pckfn23]

[Pckfn23]

[Pckfn23]

[Pckfn23]

[go pak go]

Is Brenton Cox like seriously entering the conversation of our best edge defender?

[Pckfn23]

Wasn't even reviewed, which is weird.

[Raptorman]

And about this bit. Wrong. Just focus on the center in this video from about the 8-11 second mark.

The angle really matters. This photo is easily 8 yards back. And one Giants player looks offsides. He's not, but that angle makes it look like it.

sphomjnlwftxmgjtvqua.jpg (140.48 KiB) Viewed 197 times

This picture is at least 8 yards back as well.

GgAFNgmXQAEXxnn.jpg (72.33 KiB) Viewed 197 times

And this one is even farther back. Probably at least 13 yards.

GgBysiraYAAIYjo.jpg (60.32 KiB) Viewed 197 times

Yeah, it was a bad call. Bitch to the NFL.

[Pckfn23]

This picture is at least 8 yards back as well. GgAFNgmXQAEXxnn.jpg

Nope you are literally making the up. That picture is directly overheard.

Yeah, it was a bad call. Bitch to the NFL.

You are the one that is continuing to make excuses, but saying it is a bad call. Weird.

[Raptorman]

This picture is at least 8 yards back as well. GgAFNgmXQAEXxnn.jpg

Nope you are literally making the up. That picture is directly overheard.

Ah, no it's not. As a long-time photographer, I can assure you it's not. It's close, but not directly. And every degree off from 90 makes a huge difference depending on how high the camera is.

[Pckfn23]

This picture is at least 8 yards back as well. GgAFNgmXQAEXxnn.jpg

Nope you are literally making the up. That picture is directly overheard.

Ah, no it's not. As a long-time photographer, I can assure you it's not.

LOL! As a long time Packer fan I can assure you it is! It surely isn't 8 yards behind the line. You continue to get your ass whipped on reviewing calls.

[Raptorman]

Nope you are literally making the up. That picture is directly overheard.

Ah, no it's not. As a long-time photographer, I can assure you it's not.

LOL! As a long time Packer fan I can assure you it is!

Come up with a picture of the camera above the formation. From down the line. That's the only way to prove it.

[Pckfn23]

This picture is at least 8 yards back as well. GgAFNgmXQAEXxnn.jpg

Nope you are literally making the up. That picture is directly overheard.

Ah, no it's not. As a long-time photographer, I can assure you it's not. It's close, but not directly. And every degree off from 90 makes a huge difference depending on how high the camera is.

Haha! You said it was 8 yards back, but now it is close!

Haha! You can't even stick to the same story.

If you don't know how high the camera is, you can't say anything for certain, yet you claim it is 8 yards back, which it certainly is not.

[Pckfn23]

Ah, no it's not. As a long-time photographer, I can assure you it's not.

LOL! As a long time Packer fan I can assure you it is!

Come up with a picture of the camera above the formation. From down the line. That's the only way to prove it.

Directly overhead is just fine and all but certainly proves there was no offsides by the Packers.

We will never get a down the line picture from the NFL as they will not provide evidence their refs were definitely wrong.

[go pak go]

Wasn't even reviewed, which is weird.

Very strange. His knee is down but I think you need to make a "football move" and I don't know if he did. Thought Valentine played that thing fantastic. Everything had to be perfect to complete that thing and looking at it now...it wasn't perfect.

[Pckfn23]

This picture is at least 8 yards back as well. GgAFNgmXQAEXxnn.jpg

Nope you are literally making the up. That picture is directly overheard.

Ah, no it's not. As a long-time photographer, I can assure you it's not. It's close, but not directly. And every degree off from 90 makes a huge difference depending on how high the camera is.

Let's go back to this. You claimed 2 things every degree off makes a huge difference and the overheard view was 8 yards back because you know since you are a long time photographer.

So, if it is 1 degrees off the camera would have to be 458 yards high to be 8 yards back. At 2 degrees it would have had to be 229 yards high. At 3 degrees it would have to be 152 yards high. At 4 degrees it would have to be 114 yards high. At 5 degrees it would have had to be 91 yards high. At 10 degrees it is 45 yards high. Etc.. etc... There is no chance the camera is more than 100 feet off the ground.

Just admit you have no idea wtf you are talking about and just trying to make excuses for a bad call.

[go pak go]

This picture is at least 8 yards back as well. GgAFNgmXQAEXxnn.jpg

Nope you are literally making the up. That picture is directly overheard.

Ah, no it's not. As a long-time photographer, I can assure you it's not. It's close, but not directly. And every degree off from 90 makes a huge difference depending on how high the camera is.

You don't need camera angles. Just look at the hands in direct relation to the hash marks.

This is not hard.

A common tactic when trying to get away with something is to make something not hard into hard.

[Raptorman]

Nope you are literally making the up. That picture is directly overheard.

Ah, no it's not. As a long-time photographer, I can assure you it's not. It's close, but not directly. And every degree off from 90 makes a huge difference depending on how high the camera is.

Let's go back to this. You claimed 2 things every degree off makes a huge difference and the overheard view was 8 yards back because you know since you are a long time photographer.

So, if it is 1 degrees off the camera would have to be 458 yards high to be 8 yards back. At 2 degrees it would have had to be 229 yards high. At 3 degrees it would have to be 152 yards high. At 4 degrees it would have to be 114 yards high. At 5 degrees it would have had to be 91 yards high. At 10 degrees it is 45 yards high. Etc.. etc... There is no chance the camera is more than 100 feet off the ground.

Just admit you have no idea wtf you are talking about and just trying to make excuses for a bad call.

And those numbers are based off of what focal length for the lens? Next, you will tell me that doesn't make a difference.

I'm not making an excuse for a bad call. I even said it was a bad call. I said you can't tell anything from the photo. Learn the difference. Reading comprehension is your friend.

[wallyuwl]

Wonder how much was Watson out vs MLF playing scared?