Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:10
Packers Huddle
The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Page 26 of 30
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:11
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:12
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:15
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:16
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:18
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:18
Is Brenton Cox like seriously entering the conversation of our best edge defender?
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:21
Wasn't even reviewed, which is weird.
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:22
The angle really matters. This photo is easily 8 yards back. And one Giants player looks offsides. He's not, but that angle makes it look like it.
- sphomjnlwftxmgjtvqua.jpg (140.48 KiB) Viewed 204 times
This picture is at least 8 yards back as well.
- GgAFNgmXQAEXxnn.jpg (72.33 KiB) Viewed 204 times
And this one is even farther back. Probably at least 13 yards.
- GgBysiraYAAIYjo.jpg (60.32 KiB) Viewed 204 times
Yeah, it was a bad call. Bitch to the NFL.
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:26
Nope you are literally making the up. That picture is directly overheard.
You are the one that is continuing to make excuses, but saying it is a bad call. Weird.Yeah, it was a bad call. Bitch to the NFL.
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:27
Ah, no it's not. As a long-time photographer, I can assure you it's not. It's close, but not directly. And every degree off from 90 makes a huge difference depending on how high the camera is.
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:29
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:30
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:32
Haha! You said it was 8 yards back, but now it is close!
Haha! You can't even stick to the same story.
If you don't know how high the camera is, you can't say anything for certain, yet you claim it is 8 yards back, which it certainly is not.
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:33
Directly overhead is just fine and all but certainly proves there was no offsides by the Packers.
We will never get a down the line picture from the NFL as they will not provide evidence their refs were definitely wrong.
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:35
Very strange. His knee is down but I think you need to make a "football move" and I don't know if he did. Thought Valentine played that thing fantastic. Everything had to be perfect to complete that thing and looking at it now...it wasn't perfect.
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:42
Let's go back to this. You claimed 2 things every degree off makes a huge difference and the overheard view was 8 yards back because you know since you are a long time photographer.
So, if it is 1 degrees off the camera would have to be 458 yards high to be 8 yards back. At 2 degrees it would have had to be 229 yards high. At 3 degrees it would have to be 152 yards high. At 4 degrees it would have to be 114 yards high. At 5 degrees it would have had to be 91 yards high. At 10 degrees it is 45 yards high. Etc.. etc... There is no chance the camera is more than 100 feet off the ground.
Just admit you have no idea wtf you are talking about and just trying to make excuses for a bad call.
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:43
You don't need camera angles. Just look at the hands in direct relation to the hash marks.
This is not hard.
A common tactic when trying to get away with something is to make something not hard into hard.
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:54
And those numbers are based off of what focal length for the lens? Next, you will tell me that doesn't make a difference.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2024 11:42Let's go back to this. You claimed 2 things every degree off makes a huge difference and the overheard view was 8 yards back because you know since you are a long time photographer.
So, if it is 1 degrees off the camera would have to be 458 yards high to be 8 yards back. At 2 degrees it would have had to be 229 yards high. At 3 degrees it would have to be 152 yards high. At 4 degrees it would have to be 114 yards high. At 5 degrees it would have had to be 91 yards high. At 10 degrees it is 45 yards high. Etc.. etc... There is no chance the camera is more than 100 feet off the ground.
Just admit you have no idea wtf you are talking about and just trying to make excuses for a bad call.
I'm not making an excuse for a bad call. I even said it was a bad call. I said you can't tell anything from the photo. Learn the difference. Reading comprehension is your friend.
Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sun., Dec. 29th, 3:25 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2024 11:54