Bears at Packers GDT: Sunday Dec 12th, 7:20pm CST

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9712
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

and while I've talked a lot about what not to do, those saying "bring in Tyler Ervin" have a perfectly good point. He's familiar, cheap, and available. There's also a FA who was on the WFT last year as a 1st year player named Isaiah Wright who has some return experience in college and a little in the pros, and fits a lot of what we do (versatile, thick, athletic) and in light of EQ's concussion and Malik Taylor apparently getting injured on top of Cobb, we might need to add to the roster, anyway.

If MLF wants to say "hey, it's your show to run, but I'm going to mandate that we do these 2 things differently from now on" about an aspect or two of STs, certainly.

I just think that a smattering of small things with overall continuity is better for the team at this juncture than doing symbolic big things.

User avatar
Pckfn23
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 14470
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

Drj820 wrote:
14 Dec 2021 10:15
Hiring a buddy is not a firable offense unless you refuse to cut bait with that buddy and let him sink your ship. That has happened many times. People hire their pals all the time for all kinds of jobs. They think they will work well with them and their affection toward the person creates a bias when hiring.
However, there is little to no evidence that this is what did and is happening with LaFleur and Drayton. Drayton is a McCarthy holdover and Lafleur and he never crossed paths before LaFleur was hired as head coach. Could they have become best pals in 2019 and 2020? Sure, anything is possible. This seems to be a manufactured scandal though as we don't have any evidence the Drayton was hired because they are friends and that he is not being fired because they are friends.
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
APB
Reactions:
Posts: 8217
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 06:53
Location: Virginia

Post by APB »

Yoop wrote:
14 Dec 2021 10:26
wrong, we ranked 29th in the league for 2020, and this year we rank 22nd, I doubt we fire Drayton at all, we are better in every category over a season ago.

https://www.lineups.com/nfl-team-rankings/special-teams
Curious where you got the 29th ranking for last year from? If I'm reading your linked site right, the Packers finished 22nd overall which matches our current ranking based upon whatever statistical weighting algorithm that site uses. I'd be interested to see that information, as well. I certainly hold turnovers, missed FGs, and big opponent returns as more impactful in tight game situations than simple fair catch plays in blowouts.

Side note: league ranking is one thing, raw data is a completely different measure. We won't be able to compare those datasets, though, until the year is complete. It is entirely possible this year's ST is performing considerably worse than last year while the team's league ranking remains relatively unchanged.

User avatar
Yoop
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 12346
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

APB wrote:
14 Dec 2021 12:03
Yoop wrote:
14 Dec 2021 10:26
wrong, we ranked 29th in the league for 2020, and this year we rank 22nd, I doubt we fire Drayton at all, we are better in every category over a season ago.

https://www.lineups.com/nfl-team-rankings/special-teams
Curious where you got the 29th ranking for last year from? If I'm reading your linked site right, the Packers finished 22nd overall which matches our current ranking based upon whatever statistical weighting algorithm that site uses. I'd be interested to see that information, as well. I certainly hold turnovers, missed FGs, and big opponent returns as more impactful in tight game situations than simple fair catch plays in blowouts.

Side note: league ranking is one thing, raw data is a completely different measure. We won't be able to compare those datasets, though, until the year is complete. It is entirely possible this year's ST is performing considerably worse than last year while the team's league ranking remains relatively unchanged.
your bound and determined to bruise my mellow :rotf: If I had my way there would be no kickoffs or punts, just field goals, thats it, the rest is to dangerous, this isn't my Daddy's NFL :lol:

anyway heres what Gosselin had to say.

There’s no denying the history. In Gosselin’s rankings, the Packers have finished last in the NFL four times since 1992 — in 2005 (under John Bonamego), 2006 (under Mike Stock), 2014 (under Shawn Slocum) and 2018 (under Zook). In Mennenga’s two years as coordinator, the Packers finished 26th in 2019 and 29th last year, leading to his firing.

https://madison.com/wsj/sports/football ... ade7d.html

I think the biggest thing to spoil our ranking this season are the missed FG's and poor returns, as 23 has shown, of about 68 punts and kicks only about 14 have been returned past the 25 yrd line, imo that seems OK considering most of those barely went past the 30, what has people upset is that most of our own returns barely make the 25 and some of them have been near disastrous, so imo our returns and FG issues are what need the most attention

JKB
Reactions:
Posts: 719
Joined: 05 Apr 2020 19:32
Location: Escanaba Michigan

Post by JKB »

Pckfn23 wrote:
14 Dec 2021 11:15
Drj820 wrote:
14 Dec 2021 10:15
Hiring a buddy is not a firable offense unless you refuse to cut bait with that buddy and let him sink your ship. That has happened many times. People hire their pals all the time for all kinds of jobs. They think they will work well with them and their affection toward the person creates a bias when hiring.
However, there is little to no evidence that this is what did and is happening with LaFleur and Drayton. Drayton is a McCarthy holdover and Lafleur and he never crossed paths before LaFleur was hired as head coach. Could they have become best pals in 2019 and 2020? Sure, anything is possible. This seems to be a manufactured scandal though as we don't have any evidence the Drayton was hired because they are friends and that he is not being fired because they are friends.

Whaaat? Untrue made up synopsis on social media?
I’m shocked!
No merit whatsoever, just horrendous ST and the fallout….

User avatar
Labrev
Reactions:
Posts: 6633
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 00:01

Post by Labrev »

I don't know about MLF and Mo being "pals" but I do recall that MLF spoke very highly of Mo in his presser shortly after hiring him and Barry, and that MLF said (iirc) Mo was in the mix last time when they hired Mennenga and that he believes Mo has a real future in this league.

It was a level of praise above mere coachspeak. I kinda doubt MLF will let him go after this season, he seems to think injuries are the culprit for the ST play more than the coaching.

I'll admit we are probably seeing the effects of no Ramsey, Redmond, et. al. rearing its ugly head. That said, I am also seeing miscues that indicate coaching malpractice.

*edit*
I mean, Crosby had been great for us for a while, and now he has the yips. Bojorquez came in looking good and his play has been going downhill. I have to chalk up these issues to the coach.
Last edited by Labrev on 14 Dec 2021 13:24, edited 1 time in total.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”
—Magneto

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8293
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

For those that can remember back, Jakeem Grant's name was fairly connected to Green Bay prior to his trade to Chicago. Looking back, now, that would have probably been a huge get for us.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
APB
Reactions:
Posts: 8217
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 06:53
Location: Virginia

Post by APB »

Yoop wrote:
14 Dec 2021 12:30
APB wrote:
14 Dec 2021 12:03
Yoop wrote:
14 Dec 2021 10:26
wrong, we ranked 29th in the league for 2020, and this year we rank 22nd, I doubt we fire Drayton at all, we are better in every category over a season ago.

https://www.lineups.com/nfl-team-rankings/special-teams
Curious where you got the 29th ranking for last year from? If I'm reading your linked site right, the Packers finished 22nd overall which matches our current ranking based upon whatever statistical weighting algorithm that site uses. I'd be interested to see that information, as well. I certainly hold turnovers, missed FGs, and big opponent returns as more impactful in tight game situations than simple fair catch plays in blowouts.

Side note: league ranking is one thing, raw data is a completely different measure. We won't be able to compare those datasets, though, until the year is complete. It is entirely possible this year's ST is performing considerably worse than last year while the team's league ranking remains relatively unchanged.
your bound and determined to bruise my mellow :rotf: If I had my way there would be no kickoffs or punts, just field goals, thats it, the rest is to dangerous, this isn't my Daddy's NFL :lol:

anyway heres what Gosselin had to say.

There’s no denying the history. In Gosselin’s rankings, the Packers have finished last in the NFL four times since 1992 — in 2005 (under John Bonamego), 2006 (under Mike Stock), 2014 (under Shawn Slocum) and 2018 (under Zook). In Mennenga’s two years as coordinator, the Packers finished 26th in 2019 and 29th last year, leading to his firing.

https://madison.com/wsj/sports/football ... ade7d.html

I think the biggest thing to spoil our ranking this season are the missed FG's and poor returns, as 23 has shown, of about 68 punts and kicks only about 14 have been returned past the 25 yrd line, imo that seems OK considering most of those barely went past the 30, what has people upset is that most of our own returns barely make the 25 and some of them have been near disastrous, so imo our returns and FG issues are what need the most attention
Ok I see. You've attributed two annual rankings based on two independent and separate evaluations.

It's probably best, from a consistency standpoint, to present annual ranking comparisons using a) just raw data or b) the same evaluation process.

I'll bet Gosselin's annual ST ranking for the Packers at the end of this year is very similar - or worse - than last years evaluation. But I guess we'll see.

User avatar
BF004
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13862
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

Yoop wrote:
13 Dec 2021 10:51
APB wrote:
13 Dec 2021 10:46
Yoop wrote:
13 Dec 2021 10:32
I went to find data that would show Opponents rarely get past the 25 on returns, no luck, so I have to go by memory, obviously these long returns stand out, but imho they are the exception.

I also think Crosby has lost some leg power, with little wind issues he can boot it deep, against a breeze, not so much, in that regard it seems we opt for hang time and coverage, again going from memory I think we've had quite a few stops short of the 25, most though are probably stopped prior to the 30.
If it exists, I bet @Pckfn23 can find that breakdown.

Brandon - is there data that shows Packers opponent average starting field position following a returned kickoff? To that point, what is the ST unit's standing in in the league on that measure?
yes please, I'am terrible at researching for some of this data. :hail:

https://bf004.shinyapps.io/Kickoff2/


2nd worst in the league.
image.png
image.png (72.55 KiB) Viewed 270 times
Image

Image

User avatar
Yoop
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 12346
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

BF004 wrote:
23 Dec 2021 13:03
Yoop wrote:
13 Dec 2021 10:51
APB wrote:
13 Dec 2021 10:46


If it exists, I bet @Pckfn23 can find that breakdown.

Brandon - is there data that shows Packers opponent average starting field position following a returned kickoff? To that point, what is the ST unit's standing in in the league on that measure?
yes please, I'am terrible at researching for some of this data. :hail:

https://bf004.shinyapps.io/Kickoff2/


2nd worst in the league.

image.png
when I click the link we are 9th from the bottom, we've improved 8 spots with the press of my finger :lol: they must have up dated?

User avatar
BF004
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13862
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

Yoop wrote:
23 Dec 2021 13:40
BF004 wrote:
23 Dec 2021 13:03
Yoop wrote:
13 Dec 2021 10:51


yes please, I'am terrible at researching for some of this data. :hail:

https://bf004.shinyapps.io/Kickoff2/


2nd worst in the league.

image.png
when I click the link we are 9th from the bottom, we've improved 8 spots with the press of my finger :lol: they must have up dated?
I built it for now to default to including all years from 2018+, the year they moved the touchback to the 25. Helps with the distribution graph. But it's interactive. ;)

Packers are 2nd worst in 2021.
Image

Image

Post Reply