Packers Huddle

Pugger wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 09:51

Even with the struggles on offense had A. Rodgers not muffed that punt and gave Washington 3 points we win that one. Why we put him back there is a puzzlement. I don't have any faith in that guy at all. I'm surprised he doesn't fumble/muff more than he already has.

I thought they yanked him after the fumble, he did have a nice catch and run later in the game, but that was the only positive thing I saw from Amari Rodgers yesterday, I think it was Nixon #25 who took over return duties.

Yoop wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 10:21

Pugger wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 09:51

Even with the struggles on offense had A. Rodgers not muffed that punt and gave Washington 3 points we win that one. Why we put him back there is a puzzlement. I don't have any faith in that guy at all. I'm surprised he doesn't fumble/muff more than he already has.

I thought they yanked him after the fumble, he did have a nice catch and run later in the game, but that was the only positive thing I saw from Amari Rodgers yesterday, I think it was Nixon #25 who took over return duties.

Nope, Amari was still in there on punt return. Nixon has been on kick returns.

Interesting. I would like to see some more metrics on Jenkins at LG.

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 10:30

Interesting. I would like to see some more metrics on Jenkins at LG.

It seems almost impossible for a LG to be bad with everyone around him at high quality. How does that even happen?

This is like when RBs run towards contact rather than the hole. Why did Doubs turn inside toward the safety?

They said it in broadcast. Run it until they can stop it. They never stopped it. We stopped running it.

paco wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 10:36

This is like when RBs run towards contact rather than the hole. Why did Doubs turn inside toward the safety?

That hurts. Wonder if that was supposed to the old Jordy backside post. But total blown coverage by the D there and we can't take advantage, whether play call or wrong route run issue.

Amari could have had a walk in touchdown as well with a better throw.


Things are there for us, we just keep kicking ourselves. Fumbles, missed blocks, not lining up correctly, running the wrong routes, drops, bad passes. Just play a cleaner game and we should be functioning at a pretty competent level.

packman114 wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 09:04

Couldn't find this in the thread but on the Rasul fumble recovery, was the illegal contact penalty a reasonable call? Or did we get screwed? McCarren said it was ticky-tack on the radio.

To me, it was utter BS. There was a little contact, but the WR essentially ran straight into Stokes. CBs aren't required to allow WRs run through them.

If I were a WAS fan, I'd call it a vet move by WR to fish a penalty

salmar80 wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 11:21

packman114 wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 09:04

Couldn't find this in the thread but on the Rasul fumble recovery, was the illegal contact penalty a reasonable call? Or did we get screwed? McCarren said it was ticky-tack on the radio.

To me, it was utter BS. There was a little contact, but the WR essentially ran straight into Stokes. CBs aren't required to allow WRs run through them.

If I were a WAS fan, I'd call it a vet move by WR to fish a penalty

I hate that call so much. Stokes said the ref told him he basically isn't allowed to touch the guy. Right call based on the rules. Horrible rule.

paco wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 10:23

Yoop wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 10:21

Pugger wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 09:51

Even with the struggles on offense had A. Rodgers not muffed that punt and gave Washington 3 points we win that one. Why we put him back there is a puzzlement. I don't have any faith in that guy at all. I'm surprised he doesn't fumble/muff more than he already has.

I thought they yanked him after the fumble, he did have a nice catch and run later in the game, but that was the only positive thing I saw from Amari Rodgers yesterday, I think it was Nixon #25 who took over return duties.

Nope, Amari was still in there on punt return. Nixon has been on kick returns.

OK, thanks, in truth I saw Nixon on the field and didn't even realize he was just the kick returner, ya know the situation is bad when we keep trotting Amari back out there after the way he drops a punt like that, geesh

paco wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 11:42

salmar80 wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 11:21

packman114 wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 09:04

Couldn't find this in the thread but on the Rasul fumble recovery, was the illegal contact penalty a reasonable call? Or did we get screwed? McCarren said it was ticky-tack on the radio.

To me, it was utter BS. There was a little contact, but the WR essentially ran straight into Stokes. CBs aren't required to allow WRs run through them.

If I were a WAS fan, I'd call it a vet move by WR to fish a penalty

I hate that call so much. Stokes said the ref told him he basically isn't allowed to touch the guy. Right call based on the rules. Horrible rule.

ehhhhh, I may be wrong.

it is a horrible interpretation of the rule, I havn't rewatched, but my memory says Stokes was planted, both feet on the ground, and the receiver cut right into him, that should have been offensive pass interference, the receiver is not allowed to hit the DB either, imo that is a deliberate attempt to knock the DB down or off the coverage

Yesterday was a big day for Amari Rodgers.

He had two catches which put his career receptions higher than his career fumbles.

7 Catches
5 Fumbles

Keep up the great work dude!

Yoop wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 12:08

paco wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 11:42

salmar80 wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 11:21

To me, it was utter BS. There was a little contact, but the WR essentially ran straight into Stokes. CBs aren't required to allow WRs run through them.

If I were a WAS fan, I'd call it a vet move by WR to fish a penalty

I hate that call so much. Stokes said the ref told him he basically isn't allowed to touch the guy. Right call based on the rules. Horrible rule.

ehhhhh, I may be wrong.

it is a horrible interpretation of the rule, I havn't rewatched, but my memory says Stokes was planted, both feet on the ground, and the receiver cut right into him, that should have been offensive pass interference, the receiver is not allowed to hit the DB either, imo that is a deliberate attempt to knock the DB down or off the coverage

Click to read the entire thread.

go pak go wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 12:09

Yesterday was a big day for Amari Rodgers.

He had two catches which put his career receptions higher than his career fumbles.

7 Catches
5 Fumbles

Keep up the great work dude!

You do realize that Amari just plays where he is told. You want to make him the whipping boy but u may want to whip who is actually responsible for why he is on the team. I do the same with Savage.

paco wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 12:11

Yoop wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 12:08

paco wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 11:42

I hate that call so much. Stokes said the ref told him he basically isn't allowed to touch the guy. Right call based on the rules. Horrible rule.

ehhhhh, I may be wrong.

it is a horrible interpretation of the rule, I havn't rewatched, but my memory says Stokes was planted, both feet on the ground, and the receiver cut right into him, that should have been offensive pass interference, the receiver is not allowed to hit the DB either, imo that is a deliberate attempt to knock the DB down or off the coverage

thanks, I stand corrected, this angle shows Stokes making contact, I still think it's a horrible rule as you said, to much advantage to the receiver.

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2022 12:19

holly molly, my eyes and memory are not what they use to be, I forgot one, this shows 8 drops.

we should bench AR and put Love in

and we wonder why where always going 3 and out