Packers Huddle

Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2023 12:17

PFR thinks he's not even close:

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... usKi00.htm

Hall of Fame Monitor

PFR HOF Monitor: 43.54 (63rd among QB, average HOF QB is 103.58)

_____

Matt Ryan, however, has a case:

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... anMa00.htm

Hall of Fame Monitor

PFR HOF Monitor: 106.05 (12th among QB, average HOF QB is 103.58)

BF004 wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2023 15:11

I personally don’t think Matt Ryan belongs in.

Yoop wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2023 14:20

Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2023 12:17

I don't know, seems just about every stat site is different, one place has Sid Luckman as top 5 QB's all time, another ranks him in the 30's, according to this only a couple top 100 with passer rating, so I don't know what to belive
https://www.profootballhof.com/all-time-passer-rating/

just wonder if those are PFR adjusted QB ratings??

heres another with Young at 97 passer rating, Rodgers now at 104 will possibly stand for years for HOF QB's

tatmuse.com/nfl/ask/lowest-passer-rating-among-hall-of-fame-quarterbacks-since-1966

Pro Football Reference has developed a Hall of Fame Monitor formula to help people get a quick idea of the strength of a player's candidacy for the Pro Football Hall of Fame. ...This is calculated on the site for all players who debuted in 1955 or later and have played at least 50 regular season games.

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2023 14:48

There was a guy on one of the old versions of this forum who used to refer to Matt Ryan as "glorified Chad Pennington." I thought it was accurate. Not an insult BTW- Chad Pennington was a solid QB when he could stay healthy.

Scott4Pack wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2023 11:25

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2023 14:48

There was a guy on one of the old versions of this forum who used to refer to Matt Ryan as "glorified Chad Pennington." I thought it was accurate. Not an insult BTW- Chad Pennington was a solid QB when he could stay healthy.

Ryan is one of those QBs that should be referred to historically as “having enough WR/TE talent to win a Super Bowl.” Yet, he didn’t. Just want the folks who insist that Rodgers should’ve won more Lombardi’s if not for lacking in that type of talent.
:-)

Yoop wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2023 11:37

Scott4Pack wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2023 11:25

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2023 14:48

There was a guy on one of the old versions of this forum who used to refer to Matt Ryan as "glorified Chad Pennington." I thought it was accurate. Not an insult BTW- Chad Pennington was a solid QB when he could stay healthy.

Ryan is one of those QBs that should be referred to historically as “having enough WR/TE talent to win a Super Bowl.” Yet, he didn’t. Just want the folks who insist that Rodgers should’ve won more Lombardi’s if not for lacking in that type of talent.
:-)

there is such a concerted effort here to say WR's don't matter it's mind numbing, I can't even relate to that type of thinking, and Rodgers went from about 2015 with declining talent and constantly breaking in mid to late to UDFA newbies every season, and none amounted to any better then most teams number 4 wideout, and comments in support of all these jags imho has degraded this forum.

the hate for Rodgers and defense of the GM's has turned rational conversation here near impossible.

YoHoChecko wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2023 16:04

Stefon Diggs absence is a weird story. Wasn't the whole vibe that Diggs and Allen were fun-loving besties having the time of their life connecting for the Bills?

Now he's absent in a way that has the head coach "very concerned," isn't about the contract he just recently signed (according to reports and to logic), and is untradeable due to that contract.

lake shark wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2023 16:28

YoHoChecko wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2023 16:04

Stefon Diggs absence is a weird story. Wasn't the whole vibe that Diggs and Allen were fun-loving besties having the time of their life connecting for the Bills?

Now he's absent in a way that has the head coach "very concerned," isn't about the contract he just recently signed (according to reports and to logic), and is untradeable due to that contract.

Sounds like a few players including Diggs and Buddha Baker are showing up for morning sessions but then leaving before actual practice.

Scott4Pack wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2023 11:25

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2023 14:48

There was a guy on one of the old versions of this forum who used to refer to Matt Ryan as "glorified Chad Pennington." I thought it was accurate. Not an insult BTW- Chad Pennington was a solid QB when he could stay healthy.

Ryan is one of those QBs that should be referred to historically as “having enough WR/TE talent to win a Super Bowl.” Yet, he didn’t. Just want the folks who insist that Rodgers should’ve won more Lombardi’s if not for lacking in that type of talent.
:-)

Labrev wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2023 08:30

lol

A 2 for Claypool is one of the most ridiculous trades I've seen in a while.... and that was almost us.

Yoop wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2023 09:48

Scott4Pack wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2023 11:25

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2023 14:48

There was a guy on one of the old versions of this forum who used to refer to Matt Ryan as "glorified Chad Pennington." I thought it was accurate. Not an insult BTW- Chad Pennington was a solid QB when he could stay healthy.

Ryan is one of those QBs that should be referred to historically as “having enough WR/TE talent to win a Super Bowl.” Yet, he didn’t. Just want the folks who insist that Rodgers should’ve won more Lombardi’s if not for lacking in that type of talent.
:-)

I just looked up the Falcons stats, Ryan had a better #2 receiver a couple years, but basically he had a Adams clone in Jones and a more productive TE the rest where on par with what Rodgers has had, during the regular season thats enough, but there leaves no room for a decline in play or injury's come the playoffs when defenses dial up the heat and have 16 games of film to prepare to stop you, Ryan isn't as good as Rodgers, and did have a little better receiver situation, and yes it does take more then just a good QB and receivers to win it all, but having them makes everything else seem better or there mistakes more easily over come.

NCF wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2023 13:58

Some absolute no brainers, but also some pretty shocking names and notable absences.

https://packerswire.usatoday.com/lists/ ... ce=twitter

Yoop wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2023 14:54

NCF wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2023 13:58

Some absolute no brainers, but also some pretty shocking names and notable absences.

https://packerswire.usatoday.com/lists/ ... ce=twitter

I thought forum consensus was that Mathew Stafford sucked, and was a lousy QB, and going to the Ram-ets was the only thing that saved his career, or was it Calvin Johnson

Sanders averaged a buck plus playing us and Payton and Peterson weren't far behind