The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
Yeah why argue, I'd rather stick with our current often injured and underperforming receiver corp going into and throughout 2025. In 2026 our schedule will give the Packers the opportunity to get to the NFCCG. Think of 2025 as another season for LaCoach to practice his complementary football theme narrative that has become extremely old and irritating.musclestang wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 05:50no way i'm signing up for a 30M dollar hit plus giving picks? not a chance. I imagine it would have to be low round picks and a re-structure with any potential partner or he'll just be cut.
You clearly haven’t been paying attention to Kupp’s recent injury history.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 06:10Yeah why argue, I'd rather stick with our current often injured and underperforming receiver corp going into and throughout 2025.musclestang wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 05:50no way i'm signing up for a 30M dollar hit plus giving picks? not a chance. I imagine it would have to be low round picks and a re-structure with any potential partner or he'll just be cut.
Fine and dandy but what about the 2025 opponents?RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 06:10Yeah why argue, I'd rather stick with our current often injured and underperforming receiver corp going into and throughout 2025. In 2026 our schedule will give the Packers the opportunity to get to the NFCCG. Think of 2025 as another season for LaCoach to practice his complementary football theme narrative that has become extremely old and irritating.musclestang wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 05:50no way i'm signing up for a 30M dollar hit plus giving picks? not a chance. I imagine it would have to be low round picks and a re-structure with any potential partner or he'll just be cut.
2026 opponents are: CHI, MINN, DET, Carolina, Atlanta, Buffalo, Miami, NFC East, New England, New Orleans, NY Jets JETS JETS JETS, Tampa Bay, NFC West.
he was laying it on thick for the "eyes to the future" type posters. We'll suck in 2025 because we're more worried about the future than now but in 2026 we'll play a losers schedule.Cdragon wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 08:08Fine and dandy but what about the 2025 opponents?RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 06:10Yeah why argue, I'd rather stick with our current often injured and underperforming receiver corp going into and throughout 2025. In 2026 our schedule will give the Packers the opportunity to get to the NFCCG. Think of 2025 as another season for LaCoach to practice his complementary football theme narrative that has become extremely old and irritating.musclestang wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 05:50no way i'm signing up for a 30M dollar hit plus giving picks? not a chance. I imagine it would have to be low round picks and a re-structure with any potential partner or he'll just be cut.
2026 opponents are: CHI, MINN, DET, Carolina, Atlanta, Buffalo, Miami, NFC East, New England, New Orleans, NY Jets JETS JETS JETS, Tampa Bay, NFC West.
You nailed it M-Stange man. Would love to see Gutey, Murphy and Policy actively get into another REGGIE GAME sweepstakes. As the story goes when Reggie came in town he was dismayed that Red Lobster didn't have catfish on the menu. Find out what Myles likes to eat and create a restaurant around his wishes. Packers need to learn how to compete again.musclestang wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 08:41he was laying it on thick for the "eyes to the future" type posters. We'll suck in 2025 because we're more worried about the future than now but in 2026 we'll play a losers schedule.Cdragon wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 08:08Fine and dandy but what about the 2025 opponents?RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 06:10
Yeah why argue, I'd rather stick with our current often injured and underperforming receiver corp going into and throughout 2025. In 2026 our schedule will give the Packers the opportunity to get to the NFCCG. Think of 2025 as another season for LaCoach to practice his complementary football theme narrative that has become extremely old and irritating.
2026 opponents are: CHI, MINN, DET, Carolina, Atlanta, Buffalo, Miami, NFC East, New England, New Orleans, NY Jets JETS JETS JETS, Tampa Bay, NFC West.
Though if 30M has to be spent and some picks to get a player for the next season and you have a gun to my head, i'd pick Myles Garrett 100 times out of 100 over Kupp
come on Guty, throw the fans a bone 
IT IS Freakin Effin Freakin TIME to SIGN the big fella.
To compete again you should first understand who your audience is. The Cleveland Browns make the decision on Myles. Not Myles.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 14:26You nailed it M-Stange man. Would love to see Gutey, Murphy and Policy actively get into another REGGIE GAME sweepstakes. As the story goes when Reggie came in town he was dismayed that Red Lobster didn't have catfish on the menu. Find out what Myles likes to eat and create a restaurant around his wishes. Packers need to learn how to compete again.musclestang wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 08:41he was laying it on thick for the "eyes to the future" type posters. We'll suck in 2025 because we're more worried about the future than now but in 2026 we'll play a losers schedule.
Though if 30M has to be spent and some picks to get a player for the next season and you have a gun to my head, i'd pick Myles Garrett 100 times out of 100 over Kupp
Kupp would fit right in with most of the Packers receivers including Musgrave, Watson, Doubs. And unfortunately Reed as well.APB wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 07:03You clearly haven’t been paying attention to Kupp’s recent injury history.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 06:10Yeah why argue, I'd rather stick with our current often injured and underperforming receiver corp going into and throughout 2025.musclestang wrote: ↑04 Feb 2025 05:50no way i'm signing up for a 30M dollar hit plus giving picks? not a chance. I imagine it would have to be low round picks and a re-structure with any potential partner or he'll just be cut.
to me Higgins, Reed, and Kraft would give us 3 receivers DC would have to game plan to stop, and all 3 would demand extra coverage to curtail there production, we saw that at times last season when Watson was healthy and Reed wasn't dropping the passes, we wont have Watson, so Higgins would seem like a smart buyNCF wrote: ↑05 Feb 2025 08:26I hate the idea of Cupp in this offense (and to a smaller extent, Davante Adams) where these guys make their living from the slot. Jayden Reed cannot play outside and even though Cupp and Adams can, they are far more effective from inside. The Packers need a true boundary receiver.
Yeah I really feel the two best candidates for Packers WR (not in the draft) is Metcalf and Adams. I think Adams has the potential at coming in at a lower cost (when considering trade compensation and $). Adams is also more rounded and versatile compared to Metcalf.NCF wrote: ↑05 Feb 2025 08:26I hate the idea of Cupp in this offense (and to a smaller extent, Davante Adams) where these guys make their living from the slot. Jayden Reed cannot play outside and even though Cupp and Adams can, they are far more effective from inside. The Packers need a true boundary receiver.
actually, I think the league likes blockbuster trades on draft night, affords lots of conversation, and a trade still amounts to being involved, I still have doubts about Guty doing a trade like that thoughflapackfan wrote: ↑05 Feb 2025 11:45No way the league allows the Packers to not be involved on day 1. We would need to acquire another Round 1 selection or Garrett himself would need to walk out to announce a draft day trade!
Announcing the trade on Draft Night would be sick. But I think keeping it under wraps for that long would be impossible.flapackfan wrote: ↑05 Feb 2025 11:45No way the league allows the Packers to not be involved on day 1. We would need to acquire another Round 1 selection or Garrett himself would need to walk out to announce a draft day trade!
That's probably right, the rumors start, are spread, and ya lose the surprise factor, but who cares, surely not this fan, Garrett would be a hard pass for me, but I think it'll take 2 first and a LVN as that SI article I read said, and it would be worth it according to them, we pick late first, so our 2 first have less value than other teams in the mix, so a higher value player in return is also in play, a lot to give up, but our first haven't been that great anywaygo pak go wrote: ↑05 Feb 2025 14:46Announcing the trade on Draft Night would be sick. But I think keeping it under wraps for that long would be impossible.flapackfan wrote: ↑05 Feb 2025 11:45No way the league allows the Packers to not be involved on day 1. We would need to acquire another Round 1 selection or Garrett himself would need to walk out to announce a draft day trade!
I think a trade of:
2025 2nd Rounder
2026 1st Rounder
Kingsley Enegbare or Lukas Van Ness might be sufficient. Enegbare is the cheaper option for the Browns.
I get nervous when talking 2 1st rounders plus because that is just so many eggs in one basket.Yoop wrote: ↑05 Feb 2025 16:10That's probably right, the rumors start, are spread, and ya lose the surprise factor, but who cares, surely not this fan, Garrett would be a hard pass for me, but I think it'll take 2 first and a LVN as that SI article I read said, and it would be worth it according to them, we pick late first, so our 2 first have less value than other teams in the mix, so a higher value player in return is also in play, a lot to give up, but our first haven't been that great anywaygo pak go wrote: ↑05 Feb 2025 14:46Announcing the trade on Draft Night would be sick. But I think keeping it under wraps for that long would be impossible.flapackfan wrote: ↑05 Feb 2025 11:45No way the league allows the Packers to not be involved on day 1. We would need to acquire another Round 1 selection or Garrett himself would need to walk out to announce a draft day trade!
I think a trade of:
2025 2nd Rounder
2026 1st Rounder
Kingsley Enegbare or Lukas Van Ness might be sufficient. Enegbare is the cheaper option for the Browns.