Page 4 of 4

Re: Packers 2021 Defense

Posted: 06 Mar 2021 11:21
by go pak go
Honestly....Kyler Fackrell filled that role really, really well.

Re: Packers 2021 Defense

Posted: 06 Mar 2021 19:40
by Christo
go pak go wrote:
06 Mar 2021 11:21
Honestly....Kyler Fackrell filled that role really, really well.
I don't think Fackrell was a problem for the Packers. Was he a star, no. But the guy had ability to rush the passer and hold his own at the line.
He had pretty good speed for someone his size too. If the Pack brought him back. I'd be happy.
Last I saw, he had a pretty good year with the giants.

Maybe I'm a bit anti Pettine, but I think he held back some players from they're overall potential.

Re: Packers 2021 Defense

Posted: 07 Mar 2021 03:48
by TheSkeptic
Christo wrote:
06 Mar 2021 19:40
go pak go wrote:
06 Mar 2021 11:21
Honestly....Kyler Fackrell filled that role really, really well.
I don't think Fackrell was a problem for the Packers. Was he a star, no. But the guy had ability to rush the passer and hold his own at the line.
He had pretty good speed for someone his size too. If the Pack brought him back. I'd be happy.
Last I saw, he had a pretty good year with the giants.

Maybe I'm a bit anti Pettine, but I think he held back some players from they're overall potential.
Preston had 1 good year. But after that the Packers would have been better off with Z, Gary, Fackrell and the money wasted on Preston

Re: Packers 2021 Defense

Posted: 07 Mar 2021 08:27
by Christo
TheSkeptic wrote:
07 Mar 2021 03:48
Christo wrote:
06 Mar 2021 19:40
go pak go wrote:
06 Mar 2021 11:21
Honestly....Kyler Fackrell filled that role really, really well.
I don't think Fackrell was a problem for the Packers. Was he a star, no. But the guy had ability to rush the passer and hold his own at the line.
He had pretty good speed for someone his size too. If the Pack brought him back. I'd be happy.
Last I saw, he had a pretty good year with the giants.

Maybe I'm a bit anti Pettine, but I think he held back some players from they're overall potential.
Preston had 1 good year. But after that the Packers would have been better off with Z, Gary, Fackrell and the money wasted on Preston
Judging from his pattern, he's had alternating years of good play, so so play. If the pattern holds. he's going to have a good year.

As far as Fackrell goes, nobody here gave a rats ass about the guy. All I ever read was he had a few good games where he had a lot of sacks and losing him would be no big deal.

Re: Packers 2021 Defense

Posted: 07 Mar 2021 09:02
by go pak go
Yeah I will have no issue keeping Preston if he has a first half 2019 performance again in 2021.

I have zero issues paying players big money. I also have zero issue paying two players at the same position money. As long as the players play up to their contract.