A little projection here, but if you watched the NFCCG closely, he wasn't just a one trick pony. It was the best game of his career, by far, but he was one of the best players on the field in that game. If he can approach that level consistently, he is well justified of this spot and probably is regardless... even if we're back to that one trick.
Rank the Roster 2021: #15
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
Read More. Post Less.
Mastered huh? I guess that is one way to say it.BF004 wrote: ↑31 May 2021 21:50Silly town, of course any burner isn’t a deep threat, that’s obvious, no one is saying anything so ridiculous. Like any good WR, routes are set up throughout a game and throughout weeks. MVS has this mastered. He is one of a handful who can consistently win deep. 100% changes how a defense plays you.
His ilk are very few who can do that. Not 32 in the league.
We are moving along, I just had 5-6 guys above MVS, but that is the fun of all of this, the different viewpoints.
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
Interesting alignment numbers:
As a percentage, all our receivers lined up in the slot a bunch last year:
Davante Adams: 47.4% from the slot, 37.2% outside, 1.1% tight or backfield
MVS: 54.6% from the slot, 30.3% outside, 5.5% tight or backfield
Lazard: 56.9% from the slot, 12.0% outside, 11.9% tight or backfield
Courtesy of rotoworld
As a percentage, all our receivers lined up in the slot a bunch last year:
Davante Adams: 47.4% from the slot, 37.2% outside, 1.1% tight or backfield
MVS: 54.6% from the slot, 30.3% outside, 5.5% tight or backfield
Lazard: 56.9% from the slot, 12.0% outside, 11.9% tight or backfield
Courtesy of rotoworld
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14468
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Does that even work out statistically?YoHoChecko wrote: ↑01 Jun 2021 07:17Interesting alignment numbers:
As a percentage, all our receivers lined up in the slot a bunch last year:
Davante Adams: 47.4% from the slot, 37.2% outside, 1.1% tight or backfield
MVS: 54.6% from the slot, 30.3% outside, 5.5% tight or backfield
Lazard: 56.9% from the slot, 12.0% outside, 11.9% tight or backfield
Courtesy of rotoworld
Let me work out how many snaps that is...
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
TBF, If #12 didn't absolutely hate him for some reason, we'd still be talking about Jeff Janis.NCF wrote: ↑01 Jun 2021 06:45If it were simple, we'd all still be talking about Jeff Janis.BF004 wrote: ↑31 May 2021 21:50Silly town, of course any burner isn’t a deep threat, that’s obvious, no one is saying anything so ridiculous. Like any good WR, routes are set up throughout a game and throughout weeks. MVS has this mastered. He is one of a handful who can consistently win deep. 100% changes how a defense plays you.
His ilk are very few who can do that. Not 32 in the league.
Janis was MVS with better hands and much better blocking.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
I don't think it does, which is why i listed the source. I'm wondering if they're considering the off ball flanker on the same side as the tight end as "slot" based on how wide he's aligned? There seem to be more total slot snaps than outside snaps counted. But who knows; it still paints an interesting picture of usage. Lazard and MVS basically in the slot the same(ish) percentage, but Lazard more likely to be sucked in and tight and MVS more likely to be pushed out and wide. Fits with what we'd guess I think, except the slot usage for MVS is higher than I expected.
I'm interested to see how those snaps are divvied up with a new big slot added to the mix (Funchess) and a new traditional slot (Amari)