Page 36 of 47
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 12 Nov 2020 16:28
by Packfntk
NCF wrote: ↑12 Nov 2020 16:24
BF004 wrote: ↑12 Nov 2020 16:06
Packfntk wrote: ↑10 Nov 2020 14:13
TRADE DEADLINE A WEEK FROM TODAY! MAKE SOME DEALS!!!!!!
C’mon, got 4 trades out and no one even declining or commenting responding for days. Let’s go!!!
If you drag your feet here, once my picks are gone, I can’t trade with you anymore. Don’t miss the boat.
@Trudge @mnkcarp @Waldo @Pckfn23
Haven't done business in a while, but I know when I do, Nick, BTP, Madcity, and YoHo usually respond instantly.
Yep, love offers. But do not like offers for 3rd and 4th round picks for starting players that some send over.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 12 Nov 2020 16:30
by Trudge
NCF wrote: ↑12 Nov 2020 16:24
BF004 wrote: ↑12 Nov 2020 16:06
Packfntk wrote: ↑10 Nov 2020 14:13
TRADE DEADLINE A WEEK FROM TODAY! MAKE SOME DEALS!!!!!!
C’mon, got 4 trades out and no one even declining or commenting responding for days. Let’s go!!!
If you drag your feet here, once my picks are gone, I can’t trade with you anymore. Don’t miss the boat.
@Trudge @mnkcarp @Waldo @Pckfn23
Haven't done business in a while, but I know when I do, Nick, BTP, Madcity, and YoHo usually respond instantly.
Well I need RB and TE so...
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 12 Nov 2020 16:35
by Packfntk
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 12 Nov 2020 17:18
by Trudge
Have to say I am having a blast this year. Better than drafting one or two each year.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 12 Nov 2020 17:27
by Pckfn23
Everytime I think I can sit and look it over another thing pulls me away!
I will try to look at it tonight during the game.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 13 Nov 2020 06:50
by NCF
Trudge wrote: ↑12 Nov 2020 16:30
Well I need RB and TE so...
I have 9 on IR if that helps you.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 13 Nov 2020 07:10
by BF004
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑12 Nov 2020 17:27
Everytime I think I can sit and look it over another thing pulls me away!
I will try to look at it tonight during the game.
Priorities, Brandon.
Those kids will be there forever, the trade deadline is in days.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 13 Nov 2020 16:33
by YoHoChecko
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑12 Nov 2020 17:27
Everytime I think I can sit and look it over another thing pulls me away!
I will try to look at it tonight during the game.
could you look over your starting roster while you're at it?
Two straight weeks of playing Humphries while he's listed as Out. This is creeping into punitive measures discussion
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 13 Nov 2020 17:30
by Packfntk
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑13 Nov 2020 16:33
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑12 Nov 2020 17:27
Everytime I think I can sit and look it over another thing pulls me away!
I will try to look at it tonight during the game.
could you look over your starting roster while you're at it?
Two straight weeks of playing Humphries while he's listed as Out. This is creeping into punitive measures discussion
![Image](https://media4.giphy.com/media/5wWf7GR2nhgamhRnEuA/giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47kwbqtz3rlmy9i67xup3vyl55v8o3hp0b94pocmbt&rid=giphy.gif)
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 13 Nov 2020 21:20
by Pckfn23
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑13 Nov 2020 16:33
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑12 Nov 2020 17:27
Everytime I think I can sit and look it over another thing pulls me away!
I will try to look at it tonight during the game.
could you look over your starting roster while you're at it?
Two straight weeks of playing Humphries while he's listed as Out. This is creeping into punitive measures discussion
Yes, I missed that he was in my starting lineup for a Thursday game. It was not intentional. If you would like to take action so be it. If an accidental start in a Thursday night game in a recreational league is so important to you, then I guess that is the way it is. Yes, there are other things that are taking precedent at the moment.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 15 Nov 2020 18:41
by BF004
Cmon, fallen short of projected total by at least 50+ the last 3 weeks. 0 skill position TDs today.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 15 Nov 2020 18:44
by Trudge
BF004 wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020 18:41
Cmon, fallen short of projected total by at least 50+ the last 3 weeks. 0 skill position TDs today.
DK Metcalf didn't have anything, thought he might have been out. 4.9 points in the 4th tells me nah.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 15 Nov 2020 19:17
by Packfntk
Fantasy was dumb this week. My team crapped all over itself.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 15 Nov 2020 20:39
by YoHoChecko
Gonna be some wild finishes in our league despite the low-scoring week.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 16 Nov 2020 10:02
by Drj820
Not sure how one gets into this league, but if any spots open up for next year i would be interested. If not, all good.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 16 Nov 2020 10:24
by NCF
Drj820 wrote: ↑16 Nov 2020 10:02
Not sure how one gets into this league, but if any spots open up for next year i would be interested. If not, all good.
You're first in line!! There have been a few times where we have really struggled to fill an empty team, so odds are the time will come.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 16 Nov 2020 10:30
by BF004
NCF wrote: ↑16 Nov 2020 10:24
Drj820 wrote: ↑16 Nov 2020 10:02
Not sure how one gets into this league, but if any spots open up for next year i would be interested. If not, all good.
You're first in line!! There have been a few times where we have really struggled to fill an empty team, so odds are the time will come.
I'd be all for booting Nick from the league.
Anyone opposed?
Also serious question if anyone wanted to bow out of the league for whatever reason, we do have a replacement. Although I am also aware those most likely to be willing to leave the league are also not following this thread.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 16 Nov 2020 11:16
by YoHoChecko
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2020 21:20
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑13 Nov 2020 16:33
Two straight weeks of playing Humphries while he's listed as Out. This is creeping into punitive measures discussion
Yes, I missed that he was in my starting lineup for a Thursday game. It was not intentional. If you would like to take action so be it. If an accidental start in a Thursday night game in a recreational league is so important to you, then I guess that is the way it is. Yes, there are other things that are taking precedent at the moment.
Honestly, I don't appreciate the response here being an attempted guilt trip. In week 9, you had 3 players who were "out." in the game. I commented on it in this thread and tagged you in it. In response, in week 10, one of those same three players remained in your lineup, despite again being out of the game.
In a league where you're among the bottom teams and points scored could be a tie-breaker, missing players in multiple weeks could impact tie breakers and draft orders, not to mention the competitive balance issues for teams playing against you (though it would have made no difference in the W/L the past two weeks).
No one is mad at you. But this league has always had to be vigilant about such things because there's no money on the line to provide incentive and motivation. It's now been pointed out. If you have more important things going on during a pandemic and life, that is fine; it's not a value judgment for me, as co-commish, to point out vacancies in your lineup. It's simply part of my volunteer responsibilities.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 16 Nov 2020 11:21
by BF004
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑16 Nov 2020 11:16
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2020 21:20
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑13 Nov 2020 16:33
Two straight weeks of playing Humphries while he's listed as Out. This is creeping into punitive measures discussion
Yes, I missed that he was in my starting lineup for a Thursday game. It was not intentional. If you would like to take action so be it. If an accidental start in a Thursday night game in a recreational league is so important to you, then I guess that is the way it is. Yes, there are other things that are taking precedent at the moment.
Honestly, I don't appreciate the response here being an attempted guilt trip. In week 9, you had 3 players who were "out." in the game. I commented on it in this thread and tagged you in it. In response, in week 10, one of those same three players remained in your lineup, despite again being out of the game.
In a league where you're among the bottom teams and points scored could be a tie-breaker, missing players in multiple weeks could impact tie breakers and draft orders, not to mention the competitive balance issues for teams playing against you (though it would have made no difference in the W/L the past two weeks).
No one is mad at you. But this league has always had to be vigilant about such things because there's no money on the line to provide incentive and motivation. It's now been pointed out. If you have more important things going on during a pandemic and life, that is fine; it's not a value judgment for me, as co-commish, to point out vacancies in your lineup. It's simply part of my volunteer responsibilities.
I do agree, the precedent has been set, no going out of their way to be mean or anything here. Simply isn't fair should one end up with a higher pick because they were playing injured players and another league member was playing theirs.
If anyone ever needs help setting their lineup, send a pm, email or text to me or yoho, we can plug in some guys for you.
Re: 2020 Dynasty League Discussion
Posted: 16 Nov 2020 11:26
by Pckfn23
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑16 Nov 2020 11:16
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2020 21:20
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑13 Nov 2020 16:33
Two straight weeks of playing Humphries while he's listed as Out. This is creeping into punitive measures discussion
Yes, I missed that he was in my starting lineup for a Thursday game. It was not intentional. If you would like to take action so be it. If an accidental start in a Thursday night game in a recreational league is so important to you, then I guess that is the way it is. Yes, there are other things that are taking precedent at the moment.
Honestly, I don't appreciate the response here being an attempted guilt trip. In week 9, you had 3 players who were "out." in the game. I commented on it in this thread and tagged you in it. In response, in week 10, one of those same three players remained in your lineup, despite again being out of the game.
In a league where you're among the bottom teams and points scored could be a tie-breaker, missing players in multiple weeks could impact tie breakers and draft orders, not to mention the competitive balance issues for teams playing against you (though it would have made no difference in the W/L the past two weeks).
No one is mad at you. But this league has always had to be vigilant about such things because there's no money on the line to provide incentive and motivation. It's now been pointed out. If you have more important things going on during a pandemic and life, that is fine; it's not a value judgment for me, as co-commish, to point out vacancies in your lineup. It's simply part of my volunteer responsibilities.
A PM would have been much better received. Also, omitting the threat would have been met better, as well. That is all.