Re: Ex Packers
Posted: 10 Jul 2023 14:01
I have to assume these people are not on this forum?People act as though Hayward is the only player we've had that produced well with a chip on there shoulder after leaving or coming here,
I have to assume these people are not on this forum?People act as though Hayward is the only player we've had that produced well with a chip on there shoulder after leaving or coming here,
I mean many on this forum including you, you blamed Capers, Ted, and McCarthy just as many others, fact is this stuff happens often, players leave teams and improve because they realize they need to play better, simple as that.
None of that means anyone has acted like that doesn't happen or Hayward was the only one to do so.
Actually he played quite well in 2015 for us, he was locking players down after we moved him into the slot full time, the week after he got abused against Demariyus Thomas in Denver. It just didn't show on the stat sheet.Madcity_matt wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 16:06He missed I think all of 2013 with a hamstring, and in 2014 and 205 combined for 3 interceptions over 32 games. We had Shields, Randall and Rollins coming back in their second years. Good on him that he had some really great seasons after he left us. No crystal balls in this business.
Hayward had 3 season to regain rookie form, and never did for us, again I stood up for Ted and Capers when that went down, and others here didn't, I wont name names, if the shoe fits wear it.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 16:24None of that means anyone has acted like that doesn't happen or Hayward was the only one to do so.
Players also improve on new teams because they are put in better position to succeed.
Hayward imho quit playing the run as he did as a rookie, he had good T totals but all where open field and rarely near the LOS, thats why Hyde played just as much in the slotLabrev wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 17:05Actually he played quite well in 2015 for us, he was locking players down after we moved him into the slot full time, the week after he got abused against Demariyus Thomas in Denver. It just didn't show on the stat sheet.Madcity_matt wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 16:06He missed I think all of 2013 with a hamstring, and in 2014 and 205 combined for 3 interceptions over 32 games. We had Shields, Randall and Rollins coming back in their second years. Good on him that he had some really great seasons after he left us. No crystal balls in this business.
No more hogwash than saying it was due to renewed motivation or a chip on his shoulder.Yoop wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 17:35Hayward had 3 season to regain rookie form, and never did for us, again I stood up for Ted and Capers when that went down, and others here didn't, I wont name names, if the shoe fits wear it.
no one held Hayward back, Hyde took away his snaps simply because Hyde played more physical, Ted didn't draft 2 DB because Hayward did well, so get off this poor Hayward wasn't put in position to succeed with us, thats hog wash and you know it.
never returned to rookie form, some think he had a falling out with staff, rumors, who knows.Captain_Ben wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 14:25Wasn't Hayward supposedly some sort of diva? Not saying it would justify us letting him go, but maybe the front office didn't see him as a good fit for the culture.
It sure as &%$@ wasn't Capers or the position he was put in with us, it was hog wash when you first said it 7 years ago just as it is now, Capers is the coach that took a disgruntled Charles Woodson and found a nitch for him that turned him into one of the best DB's of all time, and if Hayward would have dedicated himself with us the way Charles did, capers would have done the same for him, NO, this is exactly what Hayward finally did for SD,(stepped up his game) but something happened there, either he wanted big money and SD traded him, or something more personal.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 17:42No more hogwash than saying it was due to renewed motivation or a chip on his shoulder.Yoop wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 17:35Hayward had 3 season to regain rookie form, and never did for us, again I stood up for Ted and Capers when that went down, and others here didn't, I wont name names, if the shoe fits wear it.
no one held Hayward back, Hyde took away his snaps simply because Hyde played more physical, Ted didn't draft 2 DB because Hayward did well, so get off this poor Hayward wasn't put in position to succeed with us, thats hog wash and you know it.
Maybe it was a little of both being put in a better position to succeed and renewed motivation.
2015 was Haywards best season tackling, I still remember Hyde playing stronger in the box, passes defensed is his main job, he had 21 for us as a rookie and never more the 7 for us again, Hyde probably had that or more.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 17:59Casey Hayward never lost snaps to Micah Hyde.
Casey Haywards snap counts in 2015: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... tasy/2015/
Micah Hyde snap counts in 2015: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... tasy/2014/
Like YPC, which was highlighted in another thread, passes defensed doesn't tell the whole story. Shouldn't we be looking at it more indepth?
As I said, might it not be more than just black and white and be a bit of both?
Ted just went ahead and drafted two DB's to replace those future PB players, got it he did it because neither of Hyde or Hayward had impressed him or the coaches.APB wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 20:16Fact is, the Packers had two All-Pro caliber DBs on the roster in 2015. Problem was they weren’t utilized to their strengths or best positions. As soon as they left GB, Hayward in 2016 and Hyde in 2017, they blossomed. The fact the Packer defensive staff/front office didn’t/couldn’t recognize the players for who they were and chose Randall and Rollins over Hayward and Hyde is criminal.
Pretty much, yes.Yoop wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 22:34Ted just went ahead and drafted two DB's to replace those future PB players, got it he did it because neither of Hyde or Hayward had impressed him or the coaches.APB wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 20:16Fact is, the Packers had two All-Pro caliber DBs on the roster in 2015. Problem was they weren’t utilized to their strengths or best positions. As soon as they left GB, Hayward in 2016 and Hyde in 2017, they blossomed. The fact the Packer defensive staff/front office didn’t/couldn’t recognize the players for who they were and chose Randall and Rollins over Hayward and Hyde is criminal.
I think Captain Ben made a good point, Hayward fell out of favor with the coaches and obviously Thompson or he wouldn't have drafted 2 CB's in the first and 2nd round, Hayward after his injury was never the same player he was as a rookie, obvious when ya look at the stats, and remember back to how he played, he didn't want to play physical imho, most of his tackles where 5 yrds or more from the los, thats what I remember, and his pass defensed numbers plummeted from 21 as a rookie to never above 7 his remaining years with us.APB wrote: ↑11 Jul 2023 08:03Pretty much, yes.Yoop wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 22:34Ted just went ahead and drafted two DB's to replace those future PB players, got it he did it because neither of Hyde or Hayward had impressed him or the coaches.APB wrote: ↑10 Jul 2023 20:16Fact is, the Packers had two All-Pro caliber DBs on the roster in 2015. Problem was they weren’t utilized to their strengths or best positions. As soon as they left GB, Hayward in 2016 and Hyde in 2017, they blossomed. The fact the Packer defensive staff/front office didn’t/couldn’t recognize the players for who they were and chose Randall and Rollins over Hayward and Hyde is criminal.
The fact they weren't impressed with them is an indictment on the coaching staff and FO, not the players.