Re: #4 WR
Posted: 20 May 2023 04:53
Yeah, hit him in stride and that's 6.
the safety was baiting that throw all the way till he broke to cover the boundry, Rodgers could have/ should have thrown to him earlier, so ya can blame him for that, but this is sorta nit picky.
Toure was 6th on the team in total snap count for WR's and that team had Watkins, Lazard, and Cobb. Of course those guys were going to get a bunch of snaps. The whole snap count argument just doesn't hold any weight or logic.Yoop wrote: ↑20 May 2023 12:58the safety was baiting that throw all the way till he broke to cover the boundry, Rodgers could have/ should have thrown to him earlier, so ya can blame him for that, but this is sorta nit picky.
Wicks will start as our #4 I'd put bank on it. if Toure was so great he would have gotten more then 112 snaps and 10 targets, not as though anyone was keeping him off the field.
wrong, those receivers lost entire games, 20 entire games lost from the top 5 WR's, you can twist this up any way you want, but Toure should have been able to triple those snaps and triple the targeted throws, he didn't so why everyone is defending him as though he is better then he actually is doesn't even make sense to me.Acrobat wrote: ↑20 May 2023 14:14Toure was 6th on the team in total snap count for WR's and that team had Watkins, Lazard, and Cobb. Of course those guys were going to get a bunch of snaps. The whole snap count argument just doesn't hold any weight or logic.Yoop wrote: ↑20 May 2023 12:58the safety was baiting that throw all the way till he broke to cover the boundry, Rodgers could have/ should have thrown to him earlier, so ya can blame him for that, but this is sorta nit picky.
Wicks will start as our #4 I'd put bank on it. if Toure was so great he would have gotten more then 112 snaps and 10 targets, not as though anyone was keeping him off the field.
How many full games were lost to where more than one of those WR's missed the same game? During those games, how many running plays did we run? How many 3 WR sets? How many 4 WR sets? What were the game plans? How's many TE's were on the field?Yoop wrote: ↑20 May 2023 14:43wrong, those receivers lost entire games, 20 entire games lost from the top 5 WR's, you can twist this up any way you want, but Toure should have been able to triple those snaps and triple the targeted throws, he didn't so why everyone is defending him as though he is better then he actually is doesn't even make sense to me.Acrobat wrote: ↑20 May 2023 14:14Toure was 6th on the team in total snap count for WR's and that team had Watkins, Lazard, and Cobb. Of course those guys were going to get a bunch of snaps. The whole snap count argument just doesn't hold any weight or logic.Yoop wrote: ↑20 May 2023 12:58
the safety was baiting that throw all the way till he broke to cover the boundry, Rodgers could have/ should have thrown to him earlier, so ya can blame him for that, but this is sorta nit picky.
Wicks will start as our #4 I'd put bank on it. if Toure was so great he would have gotten more then 112 snaps and 10 targets, not as though anyone was keeping him off the field.
Wicks in 2021 had over a 1000 yrds receiving, is more polished and will walk away with 4th most receptions this year, thats my guess anyway.
heh.... 'thought he looked the same.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑31 May 2023 19:01Toure specified that he's added 8 pounds or so since the end of last season, but that by the end of the season he was down to 184-185. He says he's around 193 now. So the 8-10 pounds is not up from his previous listed weight.
Not a huge difference between 193 and 200 or so, but we've been parsing the details and talking about that statement and change, so I figured I'd mention what he said about it today.