Cheese Curds - News Around The League 2021

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

Locked
User avatar
BSA
Reactions:
Posts: 1780
Joined: 14 Aug 2020 09:20
Location: Oeschinensee

Post by BSA »

.
"The Vikings now have released their 2020 1st-round pick, CB Jeff Gladney, after he was indicted today by a grand jury in Dallas on a charge of allegedly assaulting a woman in Dallas in April."

Meanwhile Zimmer is livid with his idiot QB for his complete lack of leadership...and the $45M they guaranteed him for 2022.
Sounds like its gonna be the 60th consecutive year of disappointment in minny
IT. IS. TIME

Drj820
Reactions:
Posts: 9844
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 12:34

Post by Drj820 »

More peculiar retirements
Attachments
16A460AA-3F2E-45FB-85FF-E6B000F38F1A.jpeg
16A460AA-3F2E-45FB-85FF-E6B000F38F1A.jpeg (213.69 KiB) Viewed 444 times
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur

User avatar
Captain_Ben
Reactions:
Posts: 1326
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 16:27
Location: California

Post by Captain_Ben »

Captain_Ben wrote:
22 Jul 2021 14:55
Will the new vaccine policy cause impromptu player retirements? Gonna get interesting now...
:?:

User avatar
APB
Reactions:
Posts: 7537
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 06:53
Location: Virginia

Post by APB »

The Vikings reportedly lowest team in league from a vaccination standpoint at 64.5% of roster.



No report on Packers status other than Lafleur stating after day 2 practice there were 11 players remaining not vaccinated.
On the vaccination status of the roster: “Right now we’ve got 11 guys that aren’t [vaccinated.]
I honestly didn’t know it was a thing with the Minnesota roster...?

User avatar
BSA
Reactions:
Posts: 1780
Joined: 14 Aug 2020 09:20
Location: Oeschinensee

Post by BSA »

from Chicago Tribune:

"Bears second-round OT Teven Jenkins has yet to practice in training camp because of lingering back tightness.

The rookie was expected to slide right in at left tackle. Reps are paramount for Jenkins, who needs to establish chemistry with the rest of the offense before getting thrown into the fire. With or Without Jenkins, the bears still suck"
IT. IS. TIME

User avatar
salmar80
Reactions:
Posts: 4473
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:07

Post by salmar80 »

BSA wrote:
03 Aug 2021 23:47
from Chicago Tribune:

"Bears second-round OT Teven Jenkins has yet to practice in training camp because of lingering back tightness.

The rookie was expected to slide right in at left tackle. Reps are paramount for Jenkins, who needs to establish chemistry with the rest of the offense before getting thrown into the fire. With or Without Jenkins, the bears still suck"
:rotf:
Image

User avatar
paco
Reactions:
Posts: 6718
Joined: 18 Mar 2020 15:29
Location: Janesville, WI

Post by paco »

So the Eagles are supposedly working on a trade for Deshaun Watson. Is it possible that their ineptness with QB's has passed the Bears? I have no idea what they are thinking.
Image
RIP JustJeff

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 4999
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

paco wrote:
05 Aug 2021 07:17
So the Eagles are supposedly working on a trade for Deshaun Watson. Is it possible that their ineptness with QB's has passed the Bears? I have no idea what they are thinking.
I mean they have to do something. Roseman has completely screwed that team up. Jalen Hurts was an omega throw pick and then they doubled down to make him the guy.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13571
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

Pckfn23 wrote:
29 Jul 2021 01:02
@YoHoChecko , can I replace this obscene Avatar now?!
Image
Image

Image

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8023
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

BF004 wrote:
05 Aug 2021 09:47
Pckfn23 wrote:
29 Jul 2021 01:02
@YoHoChecko , can I replace this obscene Avatar now?!
Image
YoHoChecko wrote:
29 Jul 2021 07:52
go pak go wrote:
29 Jul 2021 07:12
Pckfn23 wrote:
29 Jul 2021 01:02
@YoHoChecko , can I replace this obscene Avatar now?!
New season.

Get that piece of sh*t out of my sight!
Great call.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
Pckfn23
Reactions:
Posts: 13774
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

BF004 wrote:
05 Aug 2021 09:47
Pckfn23 wrote:
29 Jul 2021 01:02
@YoHoChecko , can I replace this obscene Avatar now?!
Image
Football started, it got pushed down the priority list!
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13571
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

NCF wrote:
05 Aug 2021 10:17
BF004 wrote:
05 Aug 2021 09:47
Pckfn23 wrote:
29 Jul 2021 01:02
@YoHoChecko , can I replace this obscene Avatar now?!
Image
YoHoChecko wrote:
29 Jul 2021 07:52
go pak go wrote:
29 Jul 2021 07:12


New season.

Get that piece of sh*t out of my sight!
Great call.
That was for Brandon to change it, not Yoho to respond.
Image

Image

User avatar
BSA
Reactions:
Posts: 1780
Joined: 14 Aug 2020 09:20
Location: Oeschinensee

Post by BSA »

from PFF

QB pressures among DLs since 2010:

1. Geno Atkins - 580
2. Aaron Donald - 579
3. Ndamukong Suh - 559
4. Fletcher Cox - 503
IT. IS. TIME

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9655
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

BSA wrote:
05 Aug 2021 11:15
from PFF

QB pressures among DLs since 2010:

1. Geno Atkins - 580
2. Aaron Donald - 579
3. Ndamukong Suh - 559
4. Fletcher Cox - 503
Ok, now gimmer since 2017 ;)

User avatar
Yoop
Reactions:
Posts: 11970
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

now posters pay attention to QB pressures as much as they do sacks, imo that makes more sense to me, I think most fans only see the success of a sack, and fail to notice the pressures, and while a sack is finite, the accumulations of constant pressures forces more turn overs and QB mistakes.

no surprise I guess to see Pitts. as the most successful pass rush in over a decade, 3 on the DL had plus 60 pressures, and they lost another stud midway of the season, hopefully we can get more pressure from our interior DL.

. PITTSBURGH STEELERS
The Steelers are coming off one of the best pass-rushing seasons we’ve seen since 2006, generating pressure on a whopping 45.1% of their pass-rushing snaps over the regular season.

It was a well-rounded effort, with Defensive Player of the Year hopeful T.J. Watt leading the way with 73 total pressures (third in the NFL) and both Stephon Tuitt (71 pressures) and Cameron Heyward (62 pressures) not far behind that mark. Having three of the top 10 pressure producers on the same defense is a remarkable feat, particularly considering Pittsburgh lost starting edge defender Bud Dupree midway through the seas

User avatar
BSA
Reactions:
Posts: 1780
Joined: 14 Aug 2020 09:20
Location: Oeschinensee

Post by BSA »

YoHoChecko wrote:
05 Aug 2021 11:18
Ok, now gimmer since 2017
sorry, I don't have access to PFF, I just snagged that one off a tweet.
IT. IS. TIME

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9655
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

BSA wrote:
05 Aug 2021 11:45
YoHoChecko wrote:
05 Aug 2021 11:18
Ok, now gimmer since 2017
sorry, I don't have access to PFF, I just snagged that one off a tweet.
I know, I was just teasing you about Geno Atkins age/injury/quality of play in more recent years.

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9655
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

Yoop wrote:
05 Aug 2021 11:41
now posters pay attention to QB pressures as much as they do sacks, imo that makes more sense to me, I think most fans only see the success of a sack, and fail to notice the pressures, and while a sack is finite, the accumulations of constant pressures forces more turn overs and QB mistakes.
Love this; it's just really difficult to have consistent access to those numbers. If they were listed on the regular stat sites instead of usually behind paywalls and released ion tidbits and occasional lists, we'd all pay attention to pressures. But because those numbers are safeguarded in a way that official NFL stats never have been, we focus on the numbers that are made widely available

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 12943
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

YoHoChecko wrote:
05 Aug 2021 11:52
Yoop wrote:
05 Aug 2021 11:41
now posters pay attention to QB pressures as much as they do sacks, imo that makes more sense to me, I think most fans only see the success of a sack, and fail to notice the pressures, and while a sack is finite, the accumulations of constant pressures forces more turn overs and QB mistakes.
Love this; it's just really difficult to have consistent access to those numbers. If they were listed on the regular stat sites instead of usually behind paywalls and released ion tidbits and occasional lists, we'd all pay attention to pressures. But because those numbers are safeguarded in a way that official NFL stats never have been, we focus on the numbers that are made widely available
Pressure statistics have a level of subjectivity to it.

QB hits/knockdowns and sacks are objective stats and easy calculate and track.

QB pressures though...definitely more wiggle room. It's why it's likely not as available. It takes resources to count and disagreement on the count.

So I agree. Though it's nice to stand on the high ground and say, "I don't care about sacks I care about pressures. I am a more sophisticated fan..."

It's understanding the challenge of the pressure stat to begin with.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
paco
Reactions:
Posts: 6718
Joined: 18 Mar 2020 15:29
Location: Janesville, WI

Post by paco »

lupedafiasco wrote:
05 Aug 2021 09:15
paco wrote:
05 Aug 2021 07:17
So the Eagles are supposedly working on a trade for Deshaun Watson. Is it possible that their ineptness with QB's has passed the Bears? I have no idea what they are thinking.
I mean they have to do something. Roseman has completely screwed that team up. Jalen Hurts was an omega throw pick and then they doubled down to make him the guy.
So play Hurts. They've barely given him a chance and there is no better solution at this point. Watson may, and I would say probably, won't play this year. And who knows for how long going forward. He's not a good answer for anyone right now.

Not that I care. Philly can continue to screw themselves over and over. I have 0 love for any Philly teams.
Image
RIP JustJeff

Locked