Packers Huddle

Yoop wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2021 15:13

go pak go wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2021 14:12

Yoop wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2021 13:33

I figured you'd agree after I showed that only the air game excelled, and the thrower (QB) is the most important aspect of the passing game, so in essense Rodgers carried that team.

It's the double standard and convenience of "Rodgers is to credit when the passing game excels" and "the WR's are to blame when the passing game doesn't excel" that I think is most bothersome.

And it's a narrative that is pushed hard.

OK, but it's mostly true, Rodgers makes these receivers, they don't make him, none of the receivers we've had would be better with any other QB, these are reality's that you don't seem to want to accept.

I can agree with it. I do believe Rodgers raises the level of play of his teammates or at the least he should. That's why we pay him the big bucks. That's why we call him one of the greatest to ever play the game.

That is why I have higher expectations of him and do not find it as necessary to hand out excuses when things don't go well. I instead look at #12 first as he needs to elevate his play to elevate the offense.

And that you don't seem to want to accept. My perception from reading your posts is you have a natural bias to give all credit when things go good and all blame to the perimeter and coaches when things don't go well.

Yoop wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2021 15:13

go pak go wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2021 14:12

Yoop wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2021 13:33

I figured you'd agree after I showed that only the air game excelled, and the thrower (QB) is the most important aspect of the passing game, so in essense Rodgers carried that team.

It's the double standard and convenience of "Rodgers is to credit when the passing game excels" and "the WR's are to blame when the passing game doesn't excel" that I think is most bothersome.

And it's a narrative that is pushed hard.

OK, but it's mostly true, Rodgers makes these receivers, they don't make him, none of the receivers we've had would be better with any other QB, these are reality's that you don't seem to want to accept.

With the breakdown of the Adams contract talks, if both of them end up with different teams, which one will thrive - AR with new receivers or Adams with a new QB. For that matter, if only one leaves, which one will look better - the player staying with the Pack or the one playing elsewhere?

Now why does this have to be a controversial take?




I frankly think an antibody test would be more practical than proof of vaccination.


Regardless, hope everyone who can does get the vaccine and I definitely hope the packers are over the 85%.

Sounds like a good sign Aaron will be back then.


Either that or they are hinting they wanna 3-peat here.

BF004 wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2021 08:47

Sounds like a good sign Aaron will be back then.


Either that or they are hinting they wanna 3-peat here.

Minimum 8-peat.

NCF wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2021 08:51

BF004 wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2021 08:47

Sounds like a good sign Aaron will be back then.


Either that or they are hinting they wanna 3-peat here.

Minimum 8-peat.

Whatever 'peat they are going for, our last playoff run would have been a good place for them to start... -_-

If only...

Giannis would have broken off contract talks by now and posted an image of himself and Middleton.

BF004 wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2021 08:47

Sounds like a good sign Aaron will be back then.


Either that or they are hinting they wanna 3-peat here.

Or Rodgers is retiring to play baseball and Adams is going to sit on the bench and pout because the play call didn't have his name on it

paco wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2021 07:47

It's like the two are mistakenly going into this season thinking they both won 5 championships together already.

Acrobat wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2021 07:57

paco wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2021 07:47

It's like the two are mistakenly going into this season thinking they both won 5 championships together already.

Yeah it's more like one last NFCCG choke.

Labrev wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2021 08:26

Acrobat wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2021 07:57

paco wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2021 07:47

It's like the two are mistakenly going into this season thinking they both won 5 championships together already.

Yeah it's more like one last NFCCG choke.

I'm sure neither meant it in that way. Just possibly that its a last year together. People are taking cryptic messages as 100% literal (whatever their interpretation of them are). This is all so unbelievably tiring. I'd say I'd be happy when its over, but it'll never be over. Whatever happens will linger 1 way or another. Just like the Favre stuff has lingered forever.

Sorry, Paco is not having a good day and is angry at the world. He doesn't need this drama today.

Final thought. Anyone that thinks they'll get answers to stuff at the shareholders meeting is fooling themselves. I'll eat my damn hat if they do.

NCF wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2021 11:59

Imagine if Murphy had said "Nick Collins" instead just to throw some shade.

Could be some interesting conversations this year.

Packers Super Bowl Odds got better. Glad I put $100 down when they were 18 to 1! Come on $1900!