Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14342
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14342
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
.
Warren Sharp Football puts out a graphic on Strength of Schedule to start the year...and again at mid-season
Right now, the Green Bay Packers are blessed to have the toughest remaining schedule of any team in the league
Sharp Football pre- season SOS is based on predicted wins for 2024 ( as opposed to 2023 wins)
Their midseason SOS is based on current ratings. Clearly the overall strength of the NFC North is both a surprise and a stiff challenge.
The Packers pre-season SOS was pretty close to the middle of the pack, now they've moved to the top ( toughest) spot
There are some tough-looking games for sure, but I ain't as askeered of the NFC North teams as the rest of the nation seems to be.
Note: Sharp also does SOS for offense, defense separately - see more in the link below
.
Warren Sharp Football puts out a graphic on Strength of Schedule to start the year...and again at mid-season
Right now, the Green Bay Packers are blessed to have the toughest remaining schedule of any team in the league
Sharp Football pre- season SOS is based on predicted wins for 2024 ( as opposed to 2023 wins)
Their midseason SOS is based on current ratings. Clearly the overall strength of the NFC North is both a surprise and a stiff challenge.
The Packers pre-season SOS was pretty close to the middle of the pack, now they've moved to the top ( toughest) spot
There are some tough-looking games for sure, but I ain't as askeered of the NFC North teams as the rest of the nation seems to be.
Note: Sharp also does SOS for offense, defense separately - see more in the link below
.
IT. IS. TIME
Have the Packers re-signed the crappy long snapper yet? Any new tryouts?
You locals hear anything?
You locals hear anything?
Yeah, pretty telling the top three remaining toughest schedules all reside in the NFC North, with MN the outlier at #10. I believe they've already got a few divisional games behind them, though.BSA wrote:Their midseason SOS is based on current ratings. Clearly the overall strength of the NFC North is both a surprise and a stiff challenge.
I'm not seeing the "link below"...?
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14342
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
IT. IS. TIME
I've seen several articles that are knocking the Packers OL for their run blocking - and this graphic doesn't paint a pretty picture either in terms of run blocking prowess
However:
The Packers are currently # 5 in the league in Rushing yards per game (155 ! )
The Packer are currently # 8 in rushes per game
The Packers are currently #6 in yards per rushing attempt
So apparently there is a disconnect between all of the computer cowboys and the actual results on the field
IT. IS. TIME
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14342
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Ya, I am not sure why the grades pretty much across the board point to poor OL play in the run game. It should at least be average. That said, rushing yards per game and rushes per game are a bit swayed by our 2 weeks with Willis. Yards per rush is another story. That should be an indication we are doing better than the "metrics" say.BSA wrote: ↑23 Oct 2024 11:30
I've seen several articles that are knocking the Packers OL for their run blocking - and this graphic doesn't paint a pretty picture either in terms of run blocking prowess
However:
The Packers are currently # 5 in the league in Rushing yards per game (155 ! )
The Packer are currently # 8 in rushes per game
The Packers are currently #6 in yards per rushing attempt
So apparently there is a disconnect between all of the computer cowboys and the actual results on the field
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
look at the defenses we've faced, the Texans stand above the rest and our OL sure lost that battle, imo Jacobs and Wilson do well when defenses have to focus on coverage, and use 6 in the box, we saw that in the 4th quarter Sunday, texans had to play nickle and dime, and our RB's did better then they had prior, least thats what I think I'am seeing.BSA wrote: ↑23 Oct 2024 11:30I've seen several articles that are knocking the Packers OL for their run blocking - and this graphic doesn't paint a pretty picture either in terms of run blocking prowess
However:
The Packers are currently # 5 in the league in Rushing yards per game (155 ! )
The Packer are currently # 8 in rushes per game
The Packers are currently #6 in yards per rushing attempt
So apparently there is a disconnect between all of the computer cowboys and the actual results on the field
other times I see Jacobs running up the back of our OL in the A and B gaps and bouncing it out with marginal success, same with Wilson.
we dominated a couple games against weaker defenses (slower lbers) with stretch runs, of course once ya get that horizontal stuff working it opens up the inside zone running lanes, and we got a lot of yards, personally I think those couple games raises our ranking, jmo.
Makes sense
However, it was the same OL blocking for those games AND they were run blocking against a defense that was playing the run, loading the box and trying to force Malik to beat them. If anything, those rushing totals should count for more, not less.
IT. IS. TIME
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14342
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
All true.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
i mean thats awesome as long as he stays in his lane and doesnt overstep on Hafley. Hafley seems to be doing a good job, we dont want to prevent him from cooking.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
What a bizzarro universe we are living in where I honestly believe Robert Saleh can help this football team more on the offensive side of the ball than the defensive side.
Read More. Post Less.
how do we know some of our blitz schemes against Houston weren't whispers into Hafley's ear from Saleh? it's possible sense that is what he was hired to do, help Hafley.
Last edited by Yoop on 23 Oct 2024 15:10, edited 1 time in total.
first I heard about the Saleh hire, awesome
Saleh knows this defense almost as well as Hafley, and it's popular, so helping Lafleur on offense makes sense, another set of educated eyes is a plus
I think this very smart from LaFleur: Have an outsider review the 2024 O, so we can make adjustments for the tough stretch after the bye. But the D is still taking shape under a 1st year DC, and since Hafley's been cooking, no need to go muddle the soup with another chef.