Packers Huddle

NCF wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022 12:41

texas wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022 18:19

I don't understand why the national consensus treats QBs like Baker Mayfield, Jalen Hurts, Mariota, etc as if they are actually viable QBs. They all sucked and it was obvious from day 1. PFT talking about a massive extension for Jalen Hurts, as if he were a competent franchise QB and not just a guy they drafted to be an upper-tier backup to a QB who at the time was MVP-caliber.

I don't understand the charade, like I didn't understand it for Baker Mayfield and a bunch of other guys. They all go on about Hurts being a franchise guy and everybody just pretends like it's okay. Well, it's not okay. I'm not going to sit here and be gaslit!

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... act-scale/

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022 15:48

texas wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022 18:19

I don't understand why the national consensus treats QBs like Baker Mayfield, Jalen Hurts, Mariota, etc as if they are actually viable QBs. They all sucked and it was obvious from day 1. PFT talking about a massive extension for Jalen Hurts, as if he were a competent franchise QB and not just a guy they drafted to be an upper-tier backup to a QB who at the time was MVP-caliber.

I don't understand the charade, like I didn't understand it for Baker Mayfield and a bunch of other guys. They all go on about Hurts being a franchise guy and everybody just pretends like it's okay. Well, it's not okay. I'm not going to sit here and be gaslit!

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... act-scale/

If it's any consolation, I don't think you're alone. Check out that comment section.

NCF wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022 07:30

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022 15:48

texas wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2022 18:19

I don't understand why the national consensus treats QBs like Baker Mayfield, Jalen Hurts, Mariota, etc as if they are actually viable QBs. They all sucked and it was obvious from day 1. PFT talking about a massive extension for Jalen Hurts, as if he were a competent franchise QB and not just a guy they drafted to be an upper-tier backup to a QB who at the time was MVP-caliber.

I don't understand the charade, like I didn't understand it for Baker Mayfield and a bunch of other guys. They all go on about Hurts being a franchise guy and everybody just pretends like it's okay. Well, it's not okay. I'm not going to sit here and be gaslit!

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... act-scale/

If it's any consolation, I don't think you're alone. Check out that comment section.

Really? Negative comments? I’m shocked.

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022 16:14

So what is your point? That Hurts deserves that much money?

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2022 14:15

Seems like the Panthers are becoming the kings of NFL QB sloppy seconds. But glad for Baker, hope it works out for him.

BF004 wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022 12:29

Drj820 wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022 22:45

Cardinals will regret paying little kyler that much money.

Drj820 wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022 22:45

Cardinals will regret paying little kyler that much money.

NCF wrote: ↑

22 Jul 2022 07:41

Drj820 wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022 22:45

Cardinals will regret paying little kyler that much money.

Maybe, but a lot of teams are about to regret spending that much money. It's becoming the going rate. Just wait until Lamar breaks $50M/per.

BF004 wrote: ↑

22 Jul 2022 08:02

NCF wrote: ↑

22 Jul 2022 07:41

Drj820 wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022 22:45

Cardinals will regret paying little kyler that much money.

Maybe, but a lot of teams are about to regret spending that much money. It's becoming the going rate. Just wait until Lamar breaks $50M/per.

Yeah, was gunna comment on him, he is by far the best of the lot and honestly by all accounts the real deal off the field too.

55-60.

And yeah, that is just the going rate. Strike gold with a rookie or go without a competent QB if you aren't willing to pay.

Realist wrote: ↑

22 Jul 2022 08:21

BF004 wrote: ↑

22 Jul 2022 08:02

NCF wrote: ↑

22 Jul 2022 07:41

Maybe, but a lot of teams are about to regret spending that much money. It's becoming the going rate. Just wait until Lamar breaks $50M/per.

Yeah, was gunna comment on him, he is by far the best of the lot and honestly by all accounts the real deal off the field too.

55-60.

And yeah, that is just the going rate. Strike gold with a rookie or go without a competent QB if you aren't willing to pay.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/lamar- ... yoff-stats
I wouldn't want Jackson on a big extension. Make him a pocket passer and he is less than pedestrian.

BF004 wrote: ↑

22 Jul 2022 08:27

Realist wrote: ↑

22 Jul 2022 08:21

BF004 wrote: ↑

22 Jul 2022 08:02

Yeah, was gunna comment on him, he is by far the best of the lot and honestly by all accounts the real deal off the field too.

55-60.

And yeah, that is just the going rate. Strike gold with a rookie or go without a competent QB if you aren't willing to pay.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/lamar- ... yoff-stats
I wouldn't want Jackson on a big extension. Make him a pocket passer and he is less than pedestrian.

He is actually very solid on many many advanced passing metrics. He does not have a good offense around him, scrubs at RB last year (due to injury), poor WR's throughout his career, likely a worse WR room this year than the Packers. He actually is a very good pocket passer, accurate, and actually does a really good job going through his progressions and not just running.