Mike Sherman
Posted: 17 Jun 2022 20:06
What is Mike Sherman's Packers legacy? He had Hall of Fame QBs and a darn good RB with Ahman Green.
Drj820 wrote: ↑17 Jun 2022 23:46What’s the story behind Mikey getting named GM? Certainly wasn’t like a belichik who had just straight up earned the right to be GM if he demanded the role.
Always seemed out of character to give Sherman that much power.
I know he wasn’t great, but I always liked him as a guy. Seemed like a good dude.
actually was around for the Ted hire in 05, the Packers owe a lot to Bob Harlan,wallyuwl wrote: ↑18 Jun 2022 00:29Drj820 wrote: ↑17 Jun 2022 23:46What’s the story behind Mikey getting named GM? Certainly wasn’t like a belichik who had just straight up earned the right to be GM if he demanded the role.
Always seemed out of character to give Sherman that much power.
I know he wasn’t great, but I always liked him as a guy. Seemed like a good dude.
Harland retired after the 2003 renovation referendum was passed (I think it was passed in like 1998 and construction completed for the 2003 opener) convinced the board to give the GM job to Sherman.
You would have thunk that the Packers management would have listened to Lombardi before giving Sherman the dual role. That was a blunderous move on the part of the Packers post-Wolf management. Was there ever any accountability of that bad decision? Same goes for the Devine hire.Yoop wrote: ↑18 Jun 2022 09:18actually was around for the Ted hire in 05, the Packers owe a lot to Bob Harlan,wallyuwl wrote: ↑18 Jun 2022 00:29Drj820 wrote: ↑17 Jun 2022 23:46What’s the story behind Mikey getting named GM? Certainly wasn’t like a belichik who had just straight up earned the right to be GM if he demanded the role.
Always seemed out of character to give Sherman that much power.
I know he wasn’t great, but I always liked him as a guy. Seemed like a good dude.
Harland retired after the 2003 renovation referendum was passed (I think it was passed in like 1998 and construction completed for the 2003 opener) convinced the board to give the GM job to Sherman.
In addition to Wolf, Harlan also hired Ted Thompson as general manager in 2005. In all, Harlan worked for the Packers for 37 years. "He hired good people and let them run it," said Ron Wolf, Harlan's epoch-making hire.
Both Bob and Ron Wolf told Holmgren the org would never give the duel roll of GM and coach to one person again, two years later Wolf retired, and Bob promoted coach Sherman to GM,
always thought Sherman was a good coach, excellent OL coach, but not that good a GM
We shouldn't have let Harlan retire. We should have fired him!!!!RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑19 Jun 2022 07:09You would have thunk that the Packers management would have listened to Lombardi before giving Sherman the dual role. That was a blunderous move on the part of the Packers post-Wolf management. Was there ever any accountability of that bad decision? Same goes for the Devine hire.Yoop wrote: ↑18 Jun 2022 09:18actually was around for the Ted hire in 05, the Packers owe a lot to Bob Harlan,
In addition to Wolf, Harlan also hired Ted Thompson as general manager in 2005. In all, Harlan worked for the Packers for 37 years. "He hired good people and let them run it," said Ron Wolf, Harlan's epoch-making hire.
Both Bob and Ron Wolf told Holmgren the org would never give the duel roll of GM and coach to one person again, two years later Wolf retired, and Bob promoted coach Sherman to GM,
always thought Sherman was a good coach, excellent OL coach, but not that good a GM
It was a will of ego's, Holmgren wanted power over just being the coach, and Wolf refused to give it to him, the conclusion to it according to many including Ron Wolf was the loss of the SB to Denver because Holmgren was more focused on the future versus the present, as he spent part of the run up focused on Seattle, how true that is could be debated forever, Wolf called the loss a huge disappointment, and blamed it squarely on Mike Holmgren.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑19 Jun 2022 07:09You would have thunk that the Packers management would have listened to Lombardi before giving Sherman the dual role. That was a blunderous move on the part of the Packers post-Wolf management. Was there ever any accountability of that bad decision? Same goes for the Devine hire.Yoop wrote: ↑18 Jun 2022 09:18actually was around for the Ted hire in 05, the Packers owe a lot to Bob Harlan,
In addition to Wolf, Harlan also hired Ted Thompson as general manager in 2005. In all, Harlan worked for the Packers for 37 years. "He hired good people and let them run it," said Ron Wolf, Harlan's epoch-making hire.
Both Bob and Ron Wolf told Holmgren the org would never give the duel roll of GM and coach to one person again, two years later Wolf retired, and Bob promoted coach Sherman to GM,
always thought Sherman was a good coach, excellent OL coach, but not that good a GM
Why did you post a photo of Bengston here and not Devine? Bengston was another mistake by this franchise but I doubt anyone would have succeeded in that situation. That team was getting very long in the tooth by the time Lombardi stepped down.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑19 Jun 2022 07:09You would have thunk that the Packers management would have listened to Lombardi before giving Sherman the dual role. That was a blunderous move on the part of the Packers post-Wolf management. Was there ever any accountability of that bad decision? Same goes for the Devine hire.Yoop wrote: ↑18 Jun 2022 09:18actually was around for the Ted hire in 05, the Packers owe a lot to Bob Harlan,
In addition to Wolf, Harlan also hired Ted Thompson as general manager in 2005. In all, Harlan worked for the Packers for 37 years. "He hired good people and let them run it," said Ron Wolf, Harlan's epoch-making hire.
Both Bob and Ron Wolf told Holmgren the org would never give the duel roll of GM and coach to one person again, two years later Wolf retired, and Bob promoted coach Sherman to GM,
always thought Sherman was a good coach, excellent OL coach, but not that good a GM
I tried to find the actual speech on the internet but was unsuccessful. But if I recall what I heard Coach / GM Lombardi stated at the news conference when Phil Bengtson was announced as Head Coach .......... he said something to effect that it has become increasingly clear that one man can not do both jobs. Something like that. This is what I found on the internet after a quick search "Lombardi announced at a press conference that he was stepping down as coach of the Packers to concentrate on his duties as general manager. When he finished explaining his decision, he announced that Phil Bengtson would succeed him as head coach." Maybe others here have a more detailed account of what Coach / GM Lombardi said at the podium.Pugger wrote: ↑19 Jun 2022 11:16Why did you post a photo of Bengston here and not Devine? Bengston was another mistake by this franchise but I doubt anyone would have succeeded in that situation. That team was getting very long in the tooth by the time Lombardi stepped down.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑19 Jun 2022 07:09You would have thunk that the Packers management would have listened to Lombardi before giving Sherman the dual role. That was a blunderous move on the part of the Packers post-Wolf management. Was there ever any accountability of that bad decision? Same goes for the Devine hire.Yoop wrote: ↑18 Jun 2022 09:18
actually was around for the Ted hire in 05, the Packers owe a lot to Bob Harlan,
In addition to Wolf, Harlan also hired Ted Thompson as general manager in 2005. In all, Harlan worked for the Packers for 37 years. "He hired good people and let them run it," said Ron Wolf, Harlan's epoch-making hire.
Both Bob and Ron Wolf told Holmgren the org would never give the duel roll of GM and coach to one person again, two years later Wolf retired, and Bob promoted coach Sherman to GM,
always thought Sherman was a good coach, excellent OL coach, but not that good a GM
RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑19 Jun 2022 16:04I tried to find the actual speech on the internet but was unsuccessful. But if I recall what I heard Coach / GM Lombardi stated at the news conference when Phil Bengtson was announced as Head Coach .......... he said something to effect that it has become increasingly clear that one man can not do both jobs. Something like that. This is what I found on the internet after a quick search "Lombardi announced at a press conference that he was stepping down as coach of the Packers to concentrate on his duties as general manager. When he finished explaining his decision, he announced that Phil Bengtson would succeed him as head coach." Maybe others here have a more detailed account of what Coach / GM Lombardi said at the podium.Pugger wrote: ↑19 Jun 2022 11:16Why did you post a photo of Bengston here and not Devine? Bengston was another mistake by this franchise but I doubt anyone would have succeeded in that situation. That team was getting very long in the tooth by the time Lombardi stepped down.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑19 Jun 2022 07:09
You would have thunk that the Packers management would have listened to Lombardi before giving Sherman the dual role. That was a blunderous move on the part of the Packers post-Wolf management. Was there ever any accountability of that bad decision? Same goes for the Devine hire.
What's also interesting is "In February 1969, Lombardi became head coach and general manager of the Washington Redskins. The Redskins finished at 7–5–2, their first winning record since the 1955 season." I surmise that Vince just wanted to coach again. The GM and equity position with the Redskins was just the icing on the cake.
To me, out of all the Packers teams that never won a Super Bowl, the Sherman teams were the most fun to watch. He was definitely lovable- a player's coach through and through.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑17 Jun 2022 20:06What is Mike Sherman's Packers legacy? He had Hall of Fame QBs and a darn good RB with Ahman Green.