Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 11 Jul 2022 11:08
Back to back runoffs, Love vs Slaton in the 4th runoff this year
Packers Huddle
The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Page 1 of 3
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 11 Jul 2022 12:18
What if we have a tie for the run-off? Will the forum collapse in on itself in a magnificent implosion?
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 11 Jul 2022 13:04
We might find out. Currently there is a 4-4 tie.Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑11 Jul 2022 12:18What if we have a tie for the run-off? Will the forum collapse in on itself in a magnificent implosion?
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 11 Jul 2022 13:20
well we've endured several minny explosions in the past, I caused all of them, so you might say the place is Yoop proofCrazylegs Starks wrote: ↑11 Jul 2022 12:18What if we have a tie for the run-off? Will the forum collapse in on itself in a magnificent implosion?
I expect Waldo will award both players with this slot and the season will define who was the more deserving, either that or someone will change there vote prior to the hammer falling
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 11 Jul 2022 14:29
It's embarrassing that it has gotten to this point in this vote. Stop it, the Slaton madness has gone far enough.
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 11 Jul 2022 14:30
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 11 Jul 2022 14:32
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 11 Jul 2022 15:14
Yes, we do. We all know it has nothing to do with the 4th or 5th player at a position where normally only 2 play. It is about not liking Love. It is about giving Rodgers weapons and not wasting a 1st round pick on a QB, and then going with an UDFA QB when Rodgers does really get hurt or retires, still having won only 1 SB.
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 11 Jul 2022 15:16
OK, if you say so. I still don't know if he voted for Love or Slaton from his post.TheSkeptic wrote: ↑11 Jul 2022 15:14Yes, we do. We all know it has nothing to do with the 4th or 5th player at a position where normally only 2 play. It is about not liking Love. It is about giving Rodgers weapons and not wasting a 1st round pick on a QB, and then going with an UDFA QB when Rodgers does really get hurt or retires, still having won only 1 SB.
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 11 Jul 2022 15:42
Love, I am not a monster.NCF wrote: ↑11 Jul 2022 15:16OK, if you say so. I still don't know if he voted for Love or Slaton from his post.TheSkeptic wrote: ↑11 Jul 2022 15:14Yes, we do. We all know it has nothing to do with the 4th or 5th player at a position where normally only 2 play. It is about not liking Love. It is about giving Rodgers weapons and not wasting a 1st round pick on a QB, and then going with an UDFA QB when Rodgers does really get hurt or retires, still having won only 1 SB.
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 11 Jul 2022 15:57
Teeeeeeeeej.
But I will also kinda welcome not having to argue over Love needing to be ranked.
But I will also kinda welcome not having to argue over Love needing to be ranked.
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 11 Jul 2022 16:43
Oh come on, years ago even the punter was fair game, and it was only last year when Crosby was finally ditched. The backup QB deserves to be ranked.
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 11 Jul 2022 18:53
I couldn’t bring myself to vote for Love…and now I’ve gone and tied it up at 7. Not sorry. 
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 12 Jul 2022 11:55
That's funny, I had switched to Love so we could get him off the board. Looks like Teej wins even w/o my vote.
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 12 Jul 2022 12:13
jordon love sucks
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 12 Jul 2022 13:08
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 12 Jul 2022 13:28
i cant say i feel sorry for him because he has become a multimillionaire while only starting one game in the NFL. Not a bad deal for him.
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 12 Jul 2022 16:04
unless a QB starts in first 2 years, they suck and where over drafted according to some
in reality most QB's suck and where over drafted, why? cause teams don't take the time to develop QB's, it's expensive, time, and roster spot consuming, if ya use a first round pick fans will expect him to start quickly, and while you can find a good one in later rounds, it's not as likely.
it is about money, we'll spend 3 to 4 mil grooming Love, and if he duds out it could have a reflection on the Gute for moving up to take him, but I'd Rather spend what is small potatoes compared to buying one, and again it's to tough a call at this stage to know how good Love will become, you people belong to that first group that expects that if a QB isn't starting year two there never going to be any good, and that is so lame.
in reality most QB's suck and where over drafted, why? cause teams don't take the time to develop QB's, it's expensive, time, and roster spot consuming, if ya use a first round pick fans will expect him to start quickly, and while you can find a good one in later rounds, it's not as likely.
it is about money, we'll spend 3 to 4 mil grooming Love, and if he duds out it could have a reflection on the Gute for moving up to take him, but I'd Rather spend what is small potatoes compared to buying one, and again it's to tough a call at this stage to know how good Love will become, you people belong to that first group that expects that if a QB isn't starting year two there never going to be any good, and that is so lame.
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 12 Jul 2022 17:47
I don’t think love sucks because he doesn’t start for the packers. I think he sucks because what I have seen him do on the field in practice and in games with my own eyes...well, sucks.Yoop wrote: ↑12 Jul 2022 16:04unless a QB starts in first 2 years, they suck and where over drafted according to some
in reality most QB's suck and where over drafted, why? cause teams don't take the time to develop QB's, it's expensive, time, and roster spot consuming, if ya use a first round pick fans will expect him to start quickly, and while you can find a good one in later rounds, it's not as likely.
it is about money, we'll spend 3 to 4 mil grooming Love, and if he duds out it could have a reflection on the Gute for moving up to take him, but I'd Rather spend what is small potatoes compared to buying one, and again it's to tough a call at this stage to know how good Love will become, you people belong to that first group that expects that if a QB isn't starting year two there never going to be any good, and that is so lame.
“Sucks” is not a permanent label. One can improve and graduate from suckdom status. It’s rare, but possible.
Re: Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Posted: 12 Jul 2022 19:47
As I have said b4. Love played in a weak conference and really wasn't good enough given the competition to be drafted where he was. Saying he sucks is unfair. He is exactly what he is. Not a starting nfl qb. Not his fault.Drj820 wrote: ↑12 Jul 2022 17:47I don’t think love sucks because he doesn’t start for the packers. I think he sucks because what I have seen him do on the field in practice and in games with my own eyes...well, sucks.Yoop wrote: ↑12 Jul 2022 16:04unless a QB starts in first 2 years, they suck and where over drafted according to some
in reality most QB's suck and where over drafted, why? cause teams don't take the time to develop QB's, it's expensive, time, and roster spot consuming, if ya use a first round pick fans will expect him to start quickly, and while you can find a good one in later rounds, it's not as likely.
it is about money, we'll spend 3 to 4 mil grooming Love, and if he duds out it could have a reflection on the Gute for moving up to take him, but I'd Rather spend what is small potatoes compared to buying one, and again it's to tough a call at this stage to know how good Love will become, you people belong to that first group that expects that if a QB isn't starting year two there never going to be any good, and that is so lame.
“Sucks” is not a permanent label. One can improve and graduate from suckdom status. It’s rare, but possible.