Here's your choices:
# Wins: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17.
Ringo: 10 wins
Packers 2023 Season Record Predictiions
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
-
RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4171
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
-
lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
Too early to say without the compensation and draft. For now 7 wins.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
Bingo.
Just a bit premature.
-
Scott4Pack
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2929
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
- Location: New Mexico
12
I believe!
I believe!
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!
-
YoHoChecko
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
Right now with a supposedly weaker schedule I'd go 10.
I'd like to see a few more choices pleaseRingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑14 Mar 2023 07:40Here's your choices:
# Wins: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17.
Ringo: 10 wins
10 wins, Nixon will provide 800 yards of field position
11-12 wins is well within reach for a talented squad like the 2023 Packers
When the win totals come out this summer, I'd guess GB will be at either 8.5 or 9 wins for the O/U
That 3rd place schedule combined with the weak NFC South opponents bodes well for a solid conference record
https://www.packers.com/schedule/2023-opponents
When the win totals come out this summer, I'd guess GB will be at either 8.5 or 9 wins for the O/U
That 3rd place schedule combined with the weak NFC South opponents bodes well for a solid conference record
https://www.packers.com/schedule/2023-opponents
IT. IS. TIME
I'd say 5/6 wins. After Favre left Rodgers' first year starting with a stronger supporting cast went 6-10.
-
TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
I will say 9 wins if Love stays healthy.
7 if Love stays healthy. 4 or 5 if he doesn't.
-
German_Panzer
- Reactions:
- Posts: 757
- Joined: 14 Jul 2020 06:20
With Rodgers at helm: 13, Playoffs (but somewhere along the line losing, once again missing the SB)
With Love at helm: 7, no Playoffs.
With Love at helm: 7, no Playoffs.
If Love is QB: ?
If Rodgers is QB: 4
If Rodgers is QB: 4
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
The NFC North is improving while the Packers take a step while their young QB gets his legs under him. 6 or 7 wins,
Love is the answer…
-
Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14467
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Between 6 and 10 regardless of who is QB.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
-
German_Panzer
- Reactions:
- Posts: 757
- Joined: 14 Jul 2020 06:20
You guys humiliate our diva! 
I think some here will really wake up. A motivated Rodgers without major injuries and a deep, talented team will be a force, winning his 5th MVP and play a significant role for the SB. I remember Peyton in his first year? in Denver when they dominated but then Seattle shocked them in the SB. I can easily see something similiar with #12 and the Jets.
I think some here will really wake up. A motivated Rodgers without major injuries and a deep, talented team will be a force, winning his 5th MVP and play a significant role for the SB. I remember Peyton in his first year? in Denver when they dominated but then Seattle shocked them in the SB. I can easily see something similiar with #12 and the Jets.-
Tooothsome Jeb
- Reactions:
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 19 Nov 2022 01:33
4-13. I called 4-12 in '91 and nailed it. Moderator, delete this, just like my last 3 clean, legit posts. Sorry I don't fall in line like the hammers in "The Wall." Sad what this site has become. Real sad.
Perhaps a review of Rules 1 and 3 is warranted. Your deleted posts were poster child examples of fan rage because the team didn't do what you wanted. Put together a coherent post that doesn't rip on fellow fans and/or incessantly whine about others not being as outraged over team management decisions as you and it'll stand.Tooothsome Jeb wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023 03:514-13. I called 4-12 in '91 and nailed it. Moderator, delete this, just like my last 3 clean, legit posts. Sorry I don't fall in line like the hammers in "The Wall." Sad what this site has become. Real sad.