Supplementary Football

[RingoCStarrQB]

With the Packers hitting an inflection point at 6 and 3 and an uncertain consistent winning trajectory outlook, IT IS TIME to replace LaCoach's nauseating Complementary Football narrative with a new innovative SUPPLEMENTARY FOOTBALL narrative.

Now looking for intelligent Supplementary Football concepts to replace the status quo and bring the title back to TITLETOWN!

[NCF]

[NCF]

It's all just words, but to me, all it means is can the offense not suck when the defense is playing well and vice versa. I will admit the whole We-fense thing is lame as hell, but again... words. It's on the field that matters.

[Yoop]

With the Packers hitting an inflection point at 6 and 3 and an uncertain consistent winning trajectory outlook, IT IS TIME to replace LaCoach's nauseating Complementary Football narrative with a new innovative SUPPLEMENTARY FOOTBALL narrative.

Now looking for intelligent Supplementary Football concepts to replace the status quo and bring the title back to TITLETOWN!

where the hell is Desmond Howard when ya need him?

[BF004]

It's all just words, but to me, all it means is can the offense not suck when the defense is playing well and vice versa. I will admit the whole We-fense thing is lame as hell, but again... words. It's on the field that matters.

I read it as all of our O and D should sum to 180° and not 90°.

[Cdragon]

It's all just words, but to me, all it means is can the offense not suck when the defense is playing well and vice versa. I will admit the whole We-fense thing is lame as hell, but again... words. It's on the field that matters.

I read it as all of our O and D should sum to 180° and not 90°.

You get to supplement certain plays by legally adding a 12th man.

[RingoCStarrQB]

It's all just words, but to me, all it means is can the offense not suck when the defense is playing well and vice versa. I will admit the whole We-fense thing is lame as hell, but again... words. It's on the field that matters.

I read it as all of our O and D should sum to 180° and not 90°.

Hey, what's wrong with 360. I would advocate bringing the mentality (or insanity depending how one looks at things) full circle encompassing all 3 phases PLUS the play callers. Supplement it all!

[BF004]

It's all just words, but to me, all it means is can the offense not suck when the defense is playing well and vice versa. I will admit the whole We-fense thing is lame as hell, but again... words. It's on the field that matters.

I read it as all of our O and D should sum to 180° and not 90°.

Hey, what's wrong with 360. I would advocate bringing the mentality (or insanity depending how one looks at things) full circle encompassing all 3 phases PLUS the play callers. Supplement it all!

That would be explementary then.

[Pckfn23]

I thought supplements were banned?

[Crazylegs Starks]

Don't be so obtuse

[Pckfn23]

Don't be so obtuse

It's fine. I have an acute sense for these things.

[RingoCStarrQB]

No no no. It depends what, who, where, how etc. is being supplemented.

[RingoCStarrQB]

I'm starting to appreciate my Gutey autograph z

[RingoCStarrQB]

Get ready for the Redskins, Engles, Ravens and Bengals invading Lambeau in 2025. Go Packers!

[salmar80]

I liked complimentary football where you gave everyone compliments…

[Pckfn23]

I liked complimentary football where you gave everyone compliments…

At least it isn't suppository football...

[musclestang]

This looked like as good of thread as any to post this, but came across a good break down of offensive line play and protections and sometimes why it all looks like &%$@ and as a fan, I don't know why.

[Pckfn23]

Buffalo also said after the game that they had seen this look a few times and KC never blitzed, so they took a chance that they were bluffing again and just guessed wrong.

If your guessing on the field, that's not good sound football...

[APB]

Buffalo also said after the game that they had seen this look a few times and KC never blitzed, so they took a chance that they were bluffing again and just guessed wrong.

If your guessing on the field, that's not good sound football...

When facing Spagnola, there isn't much choice in the matter.

[Pckfn23]

Buffalo also said after the game that they had seen this look a few times and KC never blitzed, so they took a chance that they were bluffing again and just guessed wrong.

If your guessing on the field, that's not good sound football...

When facing Spagnola, there isn't much choice in the matter.

There's always a choice. Guessing against Spagnola would seem to be the wrong choice since he is known for being unpredictable. Play to tendencies, absolutely.

Also, I don't buy the explanation that the RG should have waited as long to pass off his big. Spags will make Olines look like fools though.