2025 Free Agency
Posted: 25 Feb 2025 17:11
All depends on the price. We do need a #3/#4 veteran. I don't think McDuffie is back. I could see Eric Wilson being that guy but it could be any other guy as well.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑25 Feb 2025 19:22This one doesn’t make sense. Cooper is obviously an every down LB. Quay I do believe is below average player but the Packers are going to give him every opportunity especially when he closed the season somewhat strong before missing time.
This is just some hype for a Wisconsin kid to go to a Wisconsin team.
go pak go wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025 10:39All depends on the price. We do need a #3/#4 veteran. I don't think McDuffie is back. I could see Eric Wilson being that guy but it could be any other guy as well.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑25 Feb 2025 19:22This one doesn’t make sense. Cooper is obviously an every down LB. Quay I do believe is below average player but the Packers are going to give him every opportunity especially when he closed the season somewhat strong before missing time.
This is just some hype for a Wisconsin kid to go to a Wisconsin team.
My guess is Baun will be too spendy but I wouldn't be surprised if they look to improve the position.
Yeah the Packers IMO go out of their way to NOT bring Wisconsin guys to the Packers. At times to our detriment.Backthepack4ever wrote: ↑27 Feb 2025 19:06go pak go wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025 10:39All depends on the price. We do need a #3/#4 veteran. I don't think McDuffie is back. I could see Eric Wilson being that guy but it could be any other guy as well.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑25 Feb 2025 19:22This one doesn’t make sense. Cooper is obviously an every down LB. Quay I do believe is below average player but the Packers are going to give him every opportunity especially when he closed the season somewhat strong before missing time.
This is just some hype for a Wisconsin kid to go to a Wisconsin team.
My guess is Baun will be too spendy but I wouldn't be surprised if they look to improve the position.
Agreed looking and interested doesn't mean all in. Dude had a monster difference making year. Show interest and don't over spend. There are some off ball guys in the draft but I'm all for showing interest.
Packers and Wisconsin ties are nil. I don't buy that. If anything maybe they should have looked at some UW lbers ha
Yep. The body of work is atrocious. I'm sure teams will try to negotiate to the one-year wonder possibility, but on the open market, it's not going to happen.musclestang wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 15:32I think whoever signs Darnold is going to have some big time remorse if it’s any sizable contract. He’s barely a guy, despite last season for a good stretch.
it's the dei movement, but with sports, I thinkgo pak go wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 08:36Yeah the Packers IMO go out of their way to NOT bring Wisconsin guys to the Packers. At times to our detriment.Backthepack4ever wrote: ↑27 Feb 2025 19:06go pak go wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025 10:39
All depends on the price. We do need a #3/#4 veteran. I don't think McDuffie is back. I could see Eric Wilson being that guy but it could be any other guy as well.
My guess is Baun will be too spendy but I wouldn't be surprised if they look to improve the position.
Agreed looking and interested doesn't mean all in. Dude had a monster difference making year. Show interest and don't over spend. There are some off ball guys in the draft but I'm all for showing interest.
Packers and Wisconsin ties are nil. I don't buy that. If anything maybe they should have looked at some UW lbers ha
His last two games were bad. Cost him $10 million per year. But will still get $40 mil per. Just the way it is with QBs.NCF wrote: ↑01 Mar 2025 08:43Yep. The body of work is atrocious. I'm sure teams will try to negotiate to the one-year wonder possibility, but on the open market, it's not going to happen.musclestang wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 15:32I think whoever signs Darnold is going to have some big time remorse if it’s any sizable contract. He’s barely a guy, despite last season for a good stretch.
IMO, his first 15 or whatever weren't that good either. On paper yeah, but it was kind of easy. I still can't get over all the pundits just salivating everywhere and showing me how well he was seeing the field and how "fast he was processing" and then proceed to show me plays where he literally have 5 seconds in the pocket with nobody within 3 yards of the perfect semi-circle around him and then hits a wide open players directly in front of his face in the middle of the field LOL. I'm like there was nothing on time or processed about that and there was absolutely zero pressure. Every QB in the NFL can play decently under those conditions.wallyuwl wrote: ↑02 Mar 2025 16:12His last two games were bad. Cost him $10 million per year. But will still get $40 mil per. Just the way it is with QBs.NCF wrote: ↑01 Mar 2025 08:43Yep. The body of work is atrocious. I'm sure teams will try to negotiate to the one-year wonder possibility, but on the open market, it's not going to happen.musclestang wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 15:32I think whoever signs Darnold is going to have some big time remorse if it’s any sizable contract. He’s barely a guy, despite last season for a good stretch.
everything seems to go faster as ya get older, that's why old people have more accidents