Packers resign Isiah McDuffie- 2 years $8 Million
Posted: 03 Mar 2025 12:14
The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
$4M is a bargain for a valuable role player. As long as they still have a plan for him, whether as a part-time defender or even just ST, this is the kind of veteran we will be screaming for a few months from now. I'm guessing the guarantees will only be pertinent for 2025, anyway, so it is really a one-year deal with team option. That's fine with me. It's not an A grade or anything, but I have no qualms with. Solid B.
I agree to a point, but 4M isn't a lot by today's standards and I think they keep a couple of these type deals around for these types of players to keep those guys fighting hard for playing time and roster spots. They can be rewarded, just not handsomely. Keeps that level of players competitive without really affecting our big picture cap wise.
I think they can still do that via The Draft.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 14:55C. Only reason being is they should be looking to swing for an upgrade at base LB and this just maintains status quo for a position that outside of Cooper is pretty weak. Status quo isn’t terrible but it is t an upgrade either and for more money than a season ago.
I get that. Just saying we know McDuffie is just a guy so why not swing for someone else losing a guy. I’d rather swing for the potential to have a Campbell or Baun type of player who didn’t fit their old system. We just know what McDuffie is for this defense.NCF wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 15:01I think they can still do that via The Draft.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 14:55C. Only reason being is they should be looking to swing for an upgrade at base LB and this just maintains status quo for a position that outside of Cooper is pretty weak. Status quo isn’t terrible but it is t an upgrade either and for more money than a season ago.
I don't think off ball LBer is a position we can afford to spend too much on.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 15:27I get that. Just saying we know McDuffie is just a guy so why not swing for someone else losing a guy. I’d rather swing for the potential to have a Campbell or Baun type of player who didn’t fit their old system. We just know what McDuffie is for this defense.NCF wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 15:01I think they can still do that via The Draft.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 14:55C. Only reason being is they should be looking to swing for an upgrade at base LB and this just maintains status quo for a position that outside of Cooper is pretty weak. Status quo isn’t terrible but it is t an upgrade either and for more money than a season ago.
I do agree. Underwhelmed by this. I don't you can do much worse than McDuffie, like Hopper for instance, lol. But you also know what the ceiling is gunna be with McDuffie, which is low. I would rather, yeah, take a guy who didn't fit in his last scheme well, or was on someone's PS last year, but take a chance to get something higher, even if its possible you might end up worse off. But at least you could save $3M a year.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 15:27I get that. Just saying we know McDuffie is just a guy so why not swing for someone else losing a guy. I’d rather swing for the potential to have a Campbell or Baun type of player who didn’t fit their old system. We just know what McDuffie is for this defense.NCF wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 15:01I think they can still do that via The Draft.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 14:55C. Only reason being is they should be looking to swing for an upgrade at base LB and this just maintains status quo for a position that outside of Cooper is pretty weak. Status quo isn’t terrible but it is t an upgrade either and for more money than a season ago.
Yeah, like do a rinse and repeat of the De'Vondre Campbell signing only with the foresight to know he's a one-year-wonder after being selected All-Pro in the year he plays for the Packers but, despite that, then NOT sign him to a long term deal.BF004 wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 16:11I do agree. Underwhelmed by this. I don't you can do much worse than McDuffie, like Hopper for instance, lol. But you also know what the ceiling is gunna be with McDuffie, which is low. I would rather, yeah, take a guy who didn't fit in his last scheme well, or was on someone's PS last year, but take a chance to get something higher, even if its possible you might end up worse off. But at least you could save $3M a year.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 15:27I get that. Just saying we know McDuffie is just a guy so why not swing for someone else losing a guy. I’d rather swing for the potential to have a Campbell or Baun type of player who didn’t fit their old system. We just know what McDuffie is for this defense.
Obviously it’s unlikely. I’m not trying to say it’s easy to find but I’d rather try something where the result is unknown instead of taking a known average to below average player.APB wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 16:19Yeah, like do a rinse and repeat of the De'Vondre Campbell signing only with the foresight to know he's a one-year-wonder after being selected All-Pro in the year he plays for the Packers but, despite that, then NOT sign him to a long term deal.BF004 wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 16:11I do agree. Underwhelmed by this. I don't you can do much worse than McDuffie, like Hopper for instance, lol. But you also know what the ceiling is gunna be with McDuffie, which is low. I would rather, yeah, take a guy who didn't fit in his last scheme well, or was on someone's PS last year, but take a chance to get something higher, even if its possible you might end up worse off. But at least you could save $3M a year.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑03 Mar 2025 15:27
I get that. Just saying we know McDuffie is just a guy so why not swing for someone else losing a guy. I’d rather swing for the potential to have a Campbell or Baun type of player who didn’t fit their old system. We just know what McDuffie is for this defense.
![]()
![]()