Oooo at Washington; I can maybe go to local Packers games 2 years in a row (and 3 out of 4 years)
Re: 2022 Opponents
Posted: 04 Jan 2022 11:32
by APB
I'm geographically closest to Washington but I'd reeeeaaaaally, REEEEAAAALLY like to go see that Buffalo game live. It's doable. Sorta.
Re: 2022 Opponents
Posted: 04 Jan 2022 11:42
by YoHoChecko
With the Titans at Lambeau and us at Buffalo, I sure hope they make it fun by scheduling those late in the year when the weather is what we'd want it to be for Derrick Henry vs AJ Dillon round 2 and for all the images Buffalo v. Green Bay engenders in our imaginations
Re: 2022 Opponents
Posted: 04 Jan 2022 11:46
by APB
I just looked up plane ticket pricing, Richmond to Buffalo, for next November/December if that's any indication of my hopes and expectations for scheduling...
Re: 2022 Opponents
Posted: 04 Jan 2022 13:29
by Labrev
@Tampa NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Re: 2022 Opponents
Posted: 04 Jan 2022 13:36
by go pak go
So the road teams I haven't been to are Philly, Buffalo, Miami and Tampa.
Hopefully I can start this tradition of going to these games again.
So the road teams I haven't been to are Philly, Buffalo, Miami and Tampa.
Hopefully I can start this tradition of going to these games again.
I was eyeing Philly if I want to see a more entertaining game than Washington, haha
I’ve heard too many horror stories about opposing fans in Philly to deter my desire to attend a game there. And if it’s snowed there recently? Forget it.
Yeah Strength of Schedule in my opinion is a terrible way to judge how hard a schedule is because SoS always skews "harder" for crappy teams and "easier" for good teams. The only outlier is it apparently looks like KC had a REALLY hard schedule. The entire AFC West has a brual SoS. Likely because the division doesn't have a terrible team and because they played the AFC North (again best division top to bottom) and NFC East (decent).
The Packers though I believe played the best NFC division and 2nd best AFC division. NFC West is the most competitive top to bottom division in the NFC (anywhere from 2 -3 Playoff teams) and AFC North.
Of the 6 NFC Playoff team potentials, GB played 4 of them. GB also played 4 AFC potential playoff teams (still alive going into week 18). Finally, GB also eliminated many teams from playoff contention which is a challenge in its own end.
But SoS is bad because it skews bad teams having harder schedules since they have to play the hard team and can't play themselves. Like MN and GB have the EXACT same schedule (even home and road) for the exception that the Packers played at the Chiefs, at NO's and Washington whereas MN had to play at LAC, at Tampa and Dallas (against the backup QB). And yet MN's SoS is 513 and GB is 469 mainly because the Packers drew the Vikings twice but the Vikings drew the Packers twice.
Is that .469 SoS rating for this year? Or the SoS of next years opponents?
It's for this year. It's a tie breaker when deciding draft position for teams with equal records. The teams with tougher SoS pick behind those with easier ones.
Chicago
Detroit
Minnesota
Dallas
New York Giants
New England
New York Jets
Tennessee
Los Angeles Rams/Arizona
AWAY
Chicago
Detroit
Minnesota
Philadelphia
Washington
Buffalo
Miami
Tampa Bay
Would someone please wake me up when the Green and Gold package games are firmly delineated, etched, solidified and/or confirmed as real news. Usually sometime in April.