Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2025 12:35

Why is quantity of outside additions important or why does that mean "urgency?"

Because the Bears signed like seven, and they're practically Super Bowl favorites now!

/s

RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2025 22:14

Yes. Gutenscheissenbumpst needs to up his game.

If you just tweak that to "Gutenscheissenbumst" it roughly translates to "good s**t f**ks" which sounds like a ringing endorsement to me

Remember Steelers & Giants:

You must contact Rodgers by FaceTime. He doesn't have good cell service and he doesn't know how to turn on wi-fi calling!

Here's a new practice video to critique:

Good, but I just hope last year wasn't a fluke. All his other seasons average out to only 81% https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/McMaBr01.htm He was playing in thin atmosphere of Denver were you kick the s&-# out of the ball from deep, he was having like 20+ 50+ attempts per seaso...

Good, but I just hope last year wasn't a fluke. All his other seasons average out to only 81%

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... MaBr01.htm

https://x.com/cheeseheadtv/status/1891221566005895190?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1891221566005895190%7Ctwgr%5E02955f72ad0b0227b5e407fd78d29a554f36a2e3%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fatozsports.com%2Fnfl%2Fgreen-bay-packers-news%2Fjosh-jacobs-delivers-an-eye-opening...

Well it's not our commissioner. It's someone beholden to 32 Billionaires and the NFL Corporation. Yep, the commissioner's job these days is to make the owners happy and keep the gravy train rolling. Long gone are the days of Rozelle, or even Tagliabue to some extent, who had to keep the owners in l...

Ahman Green could make people miss, bowl them over, or just simply outrun them (he had runs of 70, 83, 90, and 98 :shock: yards with us.) His five year stretch from 2000-2004 was so fun to watch. It's unfortunate he had asthma which affected him in some colder games, otherwise he may have had even m...

How bout that, nice to be off that contract. https://x.com/nfl_talk_sports/status/1890549740191781042?s=46&t=RVScvSC5MI3-MVuRYaF98A Sign him back to a one year deal. It's an odd year (2025) . We all know what that means :hide: please explain, me and I think maybe one other, possibly two members...

The problem with the list is there is only one player from before the Lombardi era is included. And before someone says we didn't see those old fellas play I suspect a lot of folks here weren't around in the 1960s either. IMO the top players in franchise history should be players who changed the ga...

One of the best kickers to ever do it. Let's not get crazy here. He was very good in the postseason, but regular season? No way. Not at the tier of Jake Elliot, Justin Tucker, Jason Hanson, Matt Prater, Vinatieri, or David Akers but I would consider him in that next tier of best kickers in the last...

PackersMax12 wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2025 22:42

One of the best kickers to ever do it.

Let's not get crazy here. He was very good in the postseason, but regular season? No way.

So Wicks is the only one who responded to Jacob's interview and it appears Reed is responding to Packers fans talking trash about the Wide Receiver group. I don't see a ton of drama here. At this point it's manufactured drama Speaking of making things up: Conspiracy theory time! I think MLF condone...

I can certainly see kids enjoying it. Back in the 90's, I had fun watching Favre, Steve Young, Jim Harbaugh, etc. participate in the QB skills competition.

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

27 Jan 2025 20:05

Alright! Now I don't have to hear how great Dan Campbell is until at least September

I've been disappointed in Myers, but...

Congrats @NCF , you win the grand prize! It's a...well this can't be right...a subscription to the jelly of the month club...?!

And congrats to our runner-up, @Pugger ! You win...a set of chopsticks once used by the legendary B-movie actor Robert Z'Dar! Wow!

go pak go wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2025 08:52

Saleh's entrance is the only plausible answer. The evidence is stacked.

We lost games after Saleh came here. The correlation is too damning.

I think you knew this response was coming:

"Correlation does not imply causation"