I don't hear any such thing as you describe when I listen to him. Where does he say "whites are racist, therefore white players need not apply?" All he intimates is that people need to see color in order to deal with racism.wallyuwl wrote: ↑18 Jan 2024 12:24His #1 qualification was he was familiar (to Kraft). #2 qualification was his race. His resume does not come even close to warranting a head coaching job based on merit. Then in his first chance to be the face of the team he essentially just posted a big "Whites are racist therefore White players need not apply" sign outside of his office. LIS, good for the rest of the division and league who wants to win.
Cheese Curds - News Around The League 2023
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- williewasgreat
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1666
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 05:29
Everyone expected Jerod Mayo to succeed Belichick as HC; they have been grooming him for the role for years. As far back as his playing days at Tennessee and through his pro career, Mayo has been lauded for his football IQ and leadership.
He will be a great coach for their defense. He needs a good QB and OC to have any success.
He will be a great coach for their defense. He needs a good QB and OC to have any success.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
What are the qualifications for someone to "merit" a head coach position in the NFL? And where are those qualifications in writing by the League?wallyuwl wrote: ↑18 Jan 2024 12:24
His #1 qualification was he was familiar (to Kraft). #2 qualification was his race. His resume does not come even close to warranting a head coaching job based on merit. Then in his first chance to be the face of the team he essentially just posted a big "Whites are racist therefore White players need not apply" sign outside of his office. LIS, good for the rest of the division and league who wants to win.
And you totally misunderstood what he said about race.
Hit the nail on the head.Raptorman wrote: ↑18 Jan 2024 14:49What are the qualifications for someone to "merit" a head coach position in the NFL? And where are those qualifications in writing by the League?wallyuwl wrote: ↑18 Jan 2024 12:24
His #1 qualification was he was familiar (to Kraft). #2 qualification was his race. His resume does not come even close to warranting a head coaching job based on merit. Then in his first chance to be the face of the team he essentially just posted a big "Whites are racist therefore White players need not apply" sign outside of his office. LIS, good for the rest of the division and league who wants to win.
And you totally misunderstood what he said about race.
He watched a small snippet of video, read the headline from a known political maneuverer, and jumped to the very conclusion the author intended like leading a horse to water.
Is there something I missed? I didn't see or hear him say anything implying "whites are racist and need not apply." If he did say that or make a sign that said that, it'd be messed up, but I haven't seen that.
"It's better to decide wrongly than weakly; if you're weak, you're likely to be wrong anyway."
- Bill Parcells
- Bill Parcells
Kraft specifically said he hired Mayo because he thought he was best man for the job.
Drafts old and wants to win post belichik-Brady. What he’s being accused of is silly,
Drafts old and wants to win post belichik-Brady. What he’s being accused of is silly,
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
JJ Watt puts a little perspective on the PFF grades we see every week.
The NFL All-Rookie Team was announced. No Packers made the cut for that list, either.
All the better...
https://www.nfl.com/news/2023-nfl-all-r ... hree-picks
All the better...
https://www.nfl.com/news/2023-nfl-all-r ... hree-picks
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
Ya know it’s funny. I listened to a podcast where the hosts were coming up with their own all rookie team, and no packers made the list, but despite having a great looking class, I couldn’t disagree with them on any picks.APB wrote: ↑19 Jan 2024 05:32The NFL All-Rookie Team was announced. No Packers made the cut for that list, either.
All the better...
https://www.nfl.com/news/2023-nfl-all-r ... hree-picks
The packers got a ton of guys who are already positive contributors and have the look of emerging stars. But across the league there seems to be someone putting up high-quality starter production as a rookie at every position.
It’s Jayden Reed awesome? Yeah, but Nacua broke records, and Addison and Rice out produced him
Are the rookie TEs emerging monsters? Yeah, but San LaPorta broke records and is already producing as a top TE in the league
Love what we got from Karl Brooks, but fellow mid-round interior DL rusher Koby Turner got 9 sacks!
Everywhere e put out an immediately good player who looks to grow into something better, there’s an immediate something better in the league. It was just an astonishing rookie class in tens of immediate impact across the league this year.
The Rams, Lions, Texans, and Packers seem to be the cream of the crop in overall rookie hauls. And just like it did with the chiefs last year, it propelled them all into the playoffs
Wow. End of an era in sports journalism.
- Crazylegs Starks
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3718
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 21:50
- Location: Northern WI
What went wrong is the internet killed print media. And what's the point of the swimsuit issue when there are terabytes (petabytes?) of free, uh, naughty images?
Martha Stewart is hot
Martha Stewart is hot
“We didn’t lose the game; we just ran out of time.”
- Vince Lombardi
- Vince Lombardi
spot on, my local paper charges almost as much for internet, as they do for delivered paper, a friend with a inside source says the owner wants to stop delivered papers, cheaper for them, I expect as you say profits have dwindled competing with internet media, to bad really, maybe they'll restart online onlyCrazylegs Starks wrote: ↑19 Jan 2024 12:35What went wrong is the internet killed print media. And what's the point of the swimsuit issue when there are terabytes (petabytes?) of free, uh, naughty images?
Martha Stewart is hot
They are still going at it with each other:Labrev wrote: ↑17 Jan 2024 10:16RGIII and Jay Gruden trade barbs online:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/ja ... 0733&ei=13
It started when Gruden posted, “If I ever put a QB through what Philly is putting Jalen through , I apologize. Pick up a blitz,” criticizing how the Eagles were pass protecting for Jalen Hurts throughout the game.
That led to Griffin posting a picture of himself and writing, “Say WHATTTT???” Pretty clearly, Griffin felt that he was among those quarterbacks who were owed an apology.
Gruden wasn’t interested in taking that lying down, though. He fired back at his former quarterback, accusing him of not being prepared. He wrote, “U weren’t prepared Robert ?”
Of course, in this back and forth, Griffin got another shot in, wondering if it was actually Gruden who wasn’t prepared for their time together. “You told me you didn’t know how to coach a QB who could throw and run like me, so looks like you weren’t prepared Jay,” Griffin shot back.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/ro ... cb76e&ei=9
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14467
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Start to finish #1. Fun year.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
Naughty images were online, for free, in the 90s. For a very long time the swimsuit issue's profits supported the rest of the magazine. Then SI put fat women in the issue. Then SI put a dude and Martha Stewart on the cover in recent tears. The men that supported the swimsuit issue, which supported the magazine in general, stopped supporting the swimsuit issue when SI put fat women, chicks with d***s, and senior citizens in it/on the cover instead of Kate Upton and similar.Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑19 Jan 2024 12:35What went wrong is the internet killed print media. And what's the point of the swimsuit issue when there are terabytes (petabytes?) of free, uh, naughty images?
Martha Stewart is hot
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
Yeah. There was Internet but the Internet was pretty aracaic until even the late 2000's. Speed. Photo and video quality, etc. were all pretty bad until 2007 and beyond.wallyuwl wrote: ↑19 Jan 2024 17:15Naughty images were online, for free, in the 90s. For a very long time the swimsuit issue's profits supported the rest of the magazine. Then SI put fat women in the issue. Then SI put a dude and Martha Stewart on the cover in recent tears. The men that supported the swimsuit issue, which supported the magazine in general, stopped supporting the swimsuit issue when SI put fat women, chicks with d***s, and senior citizens in it/on the cover instead of Kate Upton and similar.Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑19 Jan 2024 12:35What went wrong is the internet killed print media. And what's the point of the swimsuit issue when there are terabytes (petabytes?) of free, uh, naughty images?
Martha Stewart is hot
And that coincidentally is also when you started to see the slow decline and mergers/acquisitions of hundreds of published media companies.