From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.
For your consideration:
Luke Musgrave -------------------Cdragon
Eric Stokes ------------------------APB
Brenton Cox Jr. -------------------salmar80
Jayden Reed -----------------------go pak go
Dontayvion Wicks -----------------NCF
Josh Jacobs -------------------------RingoCStarrQB
Kenny Clark -------------------------Yoop
Jordan Love -------------------------Labrev
Devonte Wyatt ---------------------Packman114
Zayne Anderson ---------------------BF004
Tucker Kraft --------------------------Bogey
Luke Van Ness -----------------------lulu
Edgerrin Cooper ---------------------AmishMafia
Malik Heath ---------------------------Crazylegs Starks
Romeo Doubs ------------------------Pugger
Rochelle Rochelle -------------------Pckfn23
OL --------------------------------------flapackfan
Bo Melton -----------------------------lupedafiasco
Going with cooper. Jacobs has heavy consideration but with fumble and a great TD called back by penalty though not his fault, it couldn’t make up for that fumble.
Nobody else even deserves consideration. 1 play a game can’t win it from me.
Nobody picked Brooks or Valentine. From the choices above I say Cooper. He is going to be special and it looks like CV may be our replacement for Jaire in the future.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
The Packers lunatic fringe is more visible because of sheer numbers. The Packers have one of the largest fan bases in all of sports. If the fringe percentage is the same as with other teams, then we end up with larger volumes of nut jobs. - JustJeff
Not many good choices. Was going Valentine but I see he isn't an option. I can't vote for Cooper. Will go with OL. Mostly for Tom. The guy is an absolute stud and should get more recognition.
Aw, hell. Has to be Coop. Four tackles for loss, the man is a beast. I love the "wait what!?" reaction of OL who are too slow to block him, even grab him to hold.
Not many good choices. Was going Valentine but I see he isn't an option. I can't vote for Cooper. Will go with OL. Mostly for Tom. The guy is an absolute stud and should get more recognition.
If we could vote individual players on the line he might have more of a chance. I thought overall, outside of some of the 1st half run blocking, our Oline played like crap as a unit for the most part. Even the run game, a lot was Jacobs just willing things.
Not many good choices. Was going Valentine but I see he isn't an option. I can't vote for Cooper. Will go with OL. Mostly for Tom. The guy is an absolute stud and should get more recognition.
If we could vote individual players on the line he might have more of a chance. I thought overall, outside of some of the 1st half run blocking, our Oline played like crap as a unit for the most part. Even the run game, a lot was Jacobs just willing things.
You can vote for individuals on the OL even if somebody has chosen the group as a whole. OL became a choice because it is harder to quantify a individual excelling there compared to the group.
Not many good choices. Was going Valentine but I see he isn't an option. I can't vote for Cooper. Will go with OL. Mostly for Tom. The guy is an absolute stud and should get more recognition.
If we could vote individual players on the line he might have more of a chance. I thought overall, outside of some of the 1st half run blocking, our Oline played like crap as a unit for the most part. Even the run game, a lot was Jacobs just willing things.
You can vote for individuals on the OL even if somebody has chosen the group as a whole. OL became a choice because it is harder to quantify a individual excelling there compared to the group.
To be precise, one can pick an individual offensive lineman even if someone else has picked the OL as a whole. This can be a good strategy if, for example, one of the OTs is down and you're betting on a strong performance by the backup. Or if we had an OL who is used as a sneaky red zone trick play receiver.
It's just super rare that an individual OL has such an eye-catching positive performance that anyone (but Mike Wahle) notices. Heck, Tom could have an All-Pro -level game with no pressures allowed and pancake blocks to boot, and we could miss it live 'cause of all the shiny skill players.
If we could vote individual players on the line he might have more of a chance. I thought overall, outside of some of the 1st half run blocking, our Oline played like crap as a unit for the most part. Even the run game, a lot was Jacobs just willing things.
It is easier to do your job on the OLine if the other OL are doing their job. It is tougher to stand out effectively if the person next to you isn't playing in unison with your blocking assignment.