In most cases, it seems like an offseason and taking some time off really helps. Helped James Jones, Davante, etc. Like any bad habits in sports, it is so hard to turn it around during the season because it gets in your head.Pugger wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025 09:23If we all remember Davante had issues catching the ball during his first couple of seasons. Let's hope Wicks figures it out too. NFL WRs who can't catch contested balls aren't worth their salt IMO.go pak go wrote: ↑11 Feb 2025 13:18So Wicks has the lowest number of routes (didn't see Watson because his routes and targets were so low).
Wicks had the most Targets but 4th most receptions and 5th most receiving yards on the team.
So it seems he gets open in limited routes really well (would support he's a good route runner) but can't catch the damn ball.
Green Bay Packers’ News - 2025
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5797
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
The thing with Davante was he never had any drop problems until that one season. When he was at Fresno he was coming down with everything including the difficult passes.
Wicks was dropping balls in college too. Gotta really hope he can clean it up somehow but it might be who he is. Even TO made a HoF career while having drop issues.
Wicks was dropping balls in college too. Gotta really hope he can clean it up somehow but it might be who he is. Even TO made a HoF career while having drop issues.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
IMHO most drop issues are lack of concentration, and thinking about too many things during the catch process, and usually occur in the first couple of seasons of the player's career, however, other issues do occur later, one of our receivers needed eye glasses (contacts) can't remember the name now, but that was a 5th or 6th-year player.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025 12:29The thing with Davante was he never had any drop problems until that one season. When he was at Fresno he was coming down with everything including the difficult passes.
Wicks was dropping balls in college too. Gotta really hope he can clean it up somehow but it might be who he is. Even TO made a HoF career while having drop issues.
could be what dropped Wicks to the 5th round

- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5797
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
It’s 100% why he fell. He dropped 14% of his college passes. That’s incredibly high.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1749
- Joined: 28 Aug 2023 08:42
Adams was fine. Then Adams got hurt, then started dropping balls, it got in his head, then 78K fans turned on him every weekend boo'ing the &%$@ out of him. Then he healed, got his head right was back on track to being one of the best.
OK, thanks, I didn't follow up on Wick's background or college stats, so I would agree that, lower catch % might be an issue for him his whole career, bummer because he does everything else pretty welllupedafiasco wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025 16:00It’s 100% why he fell. He dropped 14% of his college passes. That’s incredibly high.
These players obviously don’t read the posts on this forum. If they had, they’d know it’s classless chaos at 1265 Lombardi…
I believe this is an improvement from prior years no?
not really, it seems to fluctuate a few spots each way year to year,
Packer players appear to generally be pretty big fans of how the Packers handle their business. The team got high marks from its players in the NFL Players Association annual survey, ranking 7th among 32 teams for overall quality. They ranked 3rd and 9th in 2024 and 2023.
Players were especially high on the Packers training facilities (their weight room got an “A” grade from players, ranking 5th in quality and 4th in overall space out of 32 teams), food and dining (their dining facilities and team nutritionist both got “A-” grades), and coaching and ownership.
Matt LaFleur’s A- grade was only good enough for 20th out of 32 teams, though. According to the survey, just 93% of players felt LaFleur used their time efficiently — the 18th best mark in the league. And players felt LaFleur was only moderately receptive to feedback from the team, earning him the 20th best grade in the league in that category.
Mark Murphy, meanwhile, was praised by players for his investment in team facilities, his contribution to overall team culture, and his commitment to winning. Though he’s not the official owner of the Packers, he stands in as the team’s owner in league business and was graded as one for the purposes of the survey.
The Packers didn’t do so hot in a couple of other areas of the survey. The Packers’ training staff, strength coaches, locker room, and treatment of families all earned “B” grades. 88% of players surveyed said they got enough one-on-one time with trainers, and 85% of players said the strength coaches provided them with personalized training programs, ranking 14th and 29th out of 32 teams in those measures, respectively. The Packers locker room, for its part, was only a problem in that some players felt they did not have enough individual space at their lockers.
As far as the family treatment goes, the report card indicated the Packers are just one of three teams in the NFL that does not provide daycare options on gameday, though they do provide a family area.
The Packers were the second-highest graded team in the NFC North. The Vikings got the second-best grade in the entire NFL, bolstered by their outstanding training facilities and locker room, while the Lions ranked ninth. The Bears, true to form, came last, ranking 14th.
Full grades for the Packers are available here, while the league-wide grades can be found here.
https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/2025 ... eport-card
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 15467
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
The grades without the commentary.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
Always noticed there doesn't seem to be any real correlation between report card ranking and team success.
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5797
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
I never put much stock into the report cards. Most players only have ever played for one or two teams. What are they comparing it to?
Cancelled by the forum elites.
I mean, some things, like locker rooms, you can compare to other teams visiting locker rooms. In general, though, I agree it's mostly worthless for some of the categories as there is no basis for comparison other than player gossip.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑27 Feb 2025 12:36I never put much stock into the report cards. Most players only have ever played for one or two teams. What are they comparing it to?

Read More. Post Less.
unless the players really ding ya it seems hard to get a C grade, we were third a year ago, I'd bet were top 10 every year since they started this, to me doing well at this, especially in coaching and facilities help most with acquiring UFA

The NFLPA got responses from over 1,700 players. The Miami Dolphins and Minnesota Vikings led the rankings, with the Packers coming in third in 2023 after a sixth-place finish in 2022.
The Packers received an A- or better in weight room, strength coaches and ownership. The team's only grade below a B- was a C+ finish in treatment of families. Thet Packers ranked in the top half of the NFL in all categories expect head coach, where Matt LaFleur's B+ rating ranked 21st.
the player gossip though matters, actually this is a player thing, not a fan thing, players don't just go to a team because they pay the most, they also go for the perks, a great coach, GM, or something besides money helps close the deal, I was surprised to see Lafleuer with lower rankings, or that family experience wasn't top notch, personally as owners we need to address these issuesNCF wrote: ↑27 Feb 2025 12:39I mean, some things, like locker rooms, you can compare to other teams visiting locker rooms. In general, though, I agree it's mostly worthless for some of the categories as there is no basis for comparison other than player gossip.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑27 Feb 2025 12:36I never put much stock into the report cards. Most players only have ever played for one or two teams. What are they comparing it to?


can't wait to watch these DT's put on a show

Good news and bad news.
The bad news? @RingoCStarrQB won't be happy about another ticket cost hike but, really, the Packers ticket is very competitive even with the hike.
The good news? The Packers are finally taking steps to keep Packer fans in the seats and profiteers from making a killing selling to opposing fans or gouging fellow Packer fans. Screw ‘em.
The bad news? @RingoCStarrQB won't be happy about another ticket cost hike but, really, the Packers ticket is very competitive even with the hike.
The good news? The Packers are finally taking steps to keep Packer fans in the seats and profiteers from making a killing selling to opposing fans or gouging fellow Packer fans. Screw ‘em.
- Backthepack4ever
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:19
- Contact:
Love this!!!!!APB wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 17:57Good news and bad news.
The bad news? @RingoCStarrQB won't be happy about another ticket cost hike but, really, the Packers ticket is very competitive even with the hike.
The good news? The Packers are finally taking steps to keep Packer fans in the seats and profiteers from making a killing selling to opposing fans or gouging fellow Packer fans. Screw ‘em.
I would gladly pay more to keep fake ass fans selling out every game. Get back to the 90s. The fan base is old. Not being mean just honest. Pass the tix to the kids or let the next one the list take over.
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 15467
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Yes!!!! Love this. Great step in the right direction.APB wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 17:57Good news and bad news.
The bad news? @RingoCStarrQB won't be happy about another ticket cost hike but, really, the Packers ticket is very competitive even with the hike.
The good news? The Packers are finally taking steps to keep Packer fans in the seats and profiteers from making a killing selling to opposing fans or gouging fellow Packer fans. Screw ‘em.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4533
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
Good first step toward killing selling to opposing fans. Glad to see some movement on this finally. Wonder how the ticket office figured out which ticket holders sold all of their tickets? Using AI to monitor the Ticketmaster website maybe?Backthepack4ever wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 18:48Love this!!!!!APB wrote: ↑28 Feb 2025 17:57Good news and bad news.
The bad news? @RingoCStarrQB won't be happy about another ticket cost hike but, really, the Packers ticket is very competitive even with the hike.
The good news? The Packers are finally taking steps to keep Packer fans in the seats and profiteers from making a killing selling to opposing fans or gouging fellow Packer fans. Screw ‘em.
I would gladly pay more to keep fake ass fans selling out every game. Get back to the 90s. The fan base is old. Not being mean just honest. Pass the tix to the kids or let the next one the list take over.