Rank the Roster 2020: #18

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

Who is the next best player on the Packers?

Poll ended at 27 May 2020 08:23

Jamaal Williams
1
6%
Billy Turner
0
No votes
Alan Lazard
9
53%
Devin Funchess
3
18%
Dean Lowry
1
6%
Oren Burks
0
No votes
Chandon Sullivan
2
12%
Marquez Valdes-Scantling
0
No votes
Equanimeous St. Brown
0
No votes
AJ Dillon
1
6%
Ka'Dar Hollman
0
No votes
Kingsley Keke
0
No votes
Raven Greene
0
No votes
Robert Tonyan
0
No votes
Josiah Deguara
0
No votes
Jon Runyan
0
No votes
Tyler Lancaster
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 17

User avatar
Labrev
Reactions:
Posts: 6628
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 00:01

Post by Labrev »

What is the thinking behind voting Jamaal Williams over AJ Dillon? Dillon is the much better talent and likely the bigger would-be benefactor should Jones miss time.

As a general rule, I disagree with the idea that rookie players are necessarily huge mystery-boxes. If you are talking about mid-to-late-round picks, UDFAs, or guys who play challenging positions, sure, that makes sense. A second-rounder who plays RB, ... not so much.

Also, one of the biggest hurdles for rookie RBs to see the field is their reliability in pass-pro, but Dillon is considered pretty competent in that department (far more than most RBs out of college).
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”
—Magneto

User avatar
Packfntk
Reactions:
Posts: 1759
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 14:09

Post by Packfntk »

Labrev wrote:
26 May 2020 15:17
What is the thinking behind voting Jamaal Williams over AJ Dillon? Dillon is the much better talent and likely the bigger would-be benefactor should Jones miss time.

As a general rule, I disagree with the idea that rookie players are necessarily huge mystery-boxes. If you are talking about mid-to-late-round picks, UDFAs, or guys who play challenging positions, sure, that makes sense. A second-rounder who plays RB, ... not so much.

Also, one of the biggest hurdles for rookie RBs to see the field is their reliability in pass-pro, but Dillon is considered pretty competent in that department (far more than most RBs out of college).
Image
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!

User avatar
Pckfn23
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 14463
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

Pass Protection - He's got all the frame, lower body power and functional strength you could possibly ask for. He can be a bit late to slide his feet and give up interior pressure vs. blitzers, however. If he's collected prior to contact, odds are pretty good he's going to deliver necessary stick.
Good awareness in pass protection and he has the traits needed to be an outstanding face up blocker.
Now if Dillon can develop more timing, processing and nuance then he has a chance to be a productive NFL runner that excels between the tackles and in pass protection.
https://thedraftnetwork.com/player/aj-dillon/W2e4IOskB1
Dillon’s lack of receiving work at Boston College hurts but he is a competent receiver and pass protector.
https://dknation.draftkings.com/2020/4/ ... y-football
Able to sort the rush and find his protection most of the time
Feet get stagnant taking on moving targets against blitz
https://www.nfl.com/prospects/algiers-d ... bd67329c54
As a pass blocker, Dillon is very capable so long as he can easily square up against the rusher. When Dillon is able to get in front of a rusher, he rolls his hips well into contact and strikes powerfully with his hands, usually stopping the defender in their tracks. Where Dillon runs into problems is when he’s forced to move laterally to get in front of a defender. Due to his limited lateral movement, Dillon sometimes struggled to reach rushers not coming directly at him and even when he was able to reach the rusher, he was often off balance. Dillon usually got enough of the rusher to prevent a sack, but he did allow more pressures than you would like to see.
https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/nfl- ... ving-power
Like a lot of collegiate workhorses, Dillon wasn't asked to do much in the passing game, because the offense was built around handing him the ball. That doesn't mean he can't catch, but for such a big back with question marks about his agility, it's not likely to be a strength. Not helping in this matter, his pass blocking has receiving mixed reviews.
https://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/footb ... wn-upside/
Dillon has the size and strength to hang in there as a blocker, however, he did miss some blocks due to him not being in the best position or he was just late at times.
https://nflmocks.com/2020/01/19/2020-nf ... ng-report/
In the passing game, Dillon can bring that pop to pass rushers attempting to get to the quarterback. Doesn’t have the quickness when sliding from one side to the other but he does the job effectively for the most part. Won’t be a liability in throwing blocks in the backfield.
https://draftwire.usatoday.com/2020/03/ ... ng-report/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, one of the biggest hurdles for rookie RBs to see the field is their reliability in pass-pro, but Dillon is considered pretty competent in that department (far more than most RBs out of college).
I think he may be a decent pass protector in college, but think saying he WILL be pretty competent in the NFL is overstating it. I would be shocked if Dillon was a decent enough pass protector right out of the gate that leads to him taking over for Williams. Rarely does a college back come to the NFL as polished enough pass protector to be good in that roll.
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8289
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

Personally, I think Dillon will begin to assume more of a role as the season goes on, but I expect it will be near zero at the beginning of the season. The biggest reason is there is no need to rush him unless an injury hits. I think he essentially gets a redshirt year and carves out a bigger role as November turns to December, but my expectations are low in 2020 and much, much higher in 2021.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
Labrev
Reactions:
Posts: 6628
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 00:01

Post by Labrev »

Pckfn23 wrote:
26 May 2020 15:35
I think he may be a decent pass protector in college, but think saying he WILL be pretty competent in the NFL is overstating it. I would be shocked if Dillon was a decent enough pass protector right out of the gate that leads to him taking over for Williams. Rarely does a college back come to the NFL as polished enough pass protector to be good in that roll.
That is because most college backs are an outright liability in the blocking department. Dillon is not. Some technical refinement and coaching may be needed, but he should be more than good enough to get the job done early in the season.

Then again, LaFleur did trot out Lane Taylor's turnstile ass at LG for a few weeks even though Elgton Jenkins was outperforming him to a pretty substantial degree, so I can see MLF sticking by J-Will longer than I would. I still think Dillon will be involved fairly early on and more-or-less overtake him by year's end, though, but we'll see.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”
—Magneto

User avatar
BF004
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13862
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

If Dillon passes the mental pass blocking test during TC, I don’t think Williams makes the team this year with this elevated salary.
Image

Image

User avatar
TheSkeptic
Reactions:
Posts: 2208
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37

Post by TheSkeptic »

I went with Lazard and I think it is a no brainer. As a near certain starter who, baring injury, will play every snap, he is the logical pick.

Next Lowry. Then Dillon.

IMO Dillon is a much better option than Williams and the last thing the Packers want to do is to over-use Jones and have him hurt when the playoffs start.

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8289
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

BF004 wrote:
26 May 2020 17:40
If Dillon passes the mental pass blocking test during TC, I don’t think Williams makes the team this year with this elevated salary.
They are not cutting Williams to save $2.2M on the cap.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
go pak go
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13515
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

NCF wrote:
27 May 2020 17:09
BF004 wrote:
26 May 2020 17:40
If Dillon passes the mental pass blocking test during TC, I don’t think Williams makes the team this year with this elevated salary.
They are not cutting Williams to save $2.2M on the cap.
Agreed. Why would we ever dump someone who is a great locker room presence, offers great depth and super cheap?
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
Packfntk
Reactions:
Posts: 1759
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 14:09

Post by Packfntk »

NCF wrote:
27 May 2020 17:09
BF004 wrote:
26 May 2020 17:40
If Dillon passes the mental pass blocking test during TC, I don’t think Williams makes the team this year with this elevated salary.
They are not cutting Williams to save $2.2M on the cap.
Why would that not be an option? Just asking. I think JWill is alright in all, but this team needs money and has a ton of very important contracts coming up. Why would that not be an option with Jones on the roster and when they just invested a high draft pick at the RB position?
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!

User avatar
Yoop
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 12336
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

Packfntk wrote:
28 May 2020 07:11
NCF wrote:
27 May 2020 17:09
BF004 wrote:
26 May 2020 17:40
If Dillon passes the mental pass blocking test during TC, I don’t think Williams makes the team this year with this elevated salary.
They are not cutting Williams to save $2.2M on the cap.
Why would that not be an option? Just asking. I think JWill is alright in all, but this team needs money and has a ton of very important contracts coming up. Why would that not be an option with Jones on the roster and when they just invested a high draft pick at the RB position?
because there is no guarantee the #1 and 2 will stay healthy, and no reason yet to think #4 will be either healthy or any good.

and while 2.2 mil. is a lot of money, when it comes to a reliable RB that does just about everything fairly well it isn't, I can't imagine them cutting Williams, just doesn't make sense to me.

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8289
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

Packfntk wrote:
28 May 2020 07:11
NCF wrote:
27 May 2020 17:09
BF004 wrote:
26 May 2020 17:40
If Dillon passes the mental pass blocking test during TC, I don’t think Williams makes the team this year with this elevated salary.
They are not cutting Williams to save $2.2M on the cap.
Why would that not be an option? Just asking. I think JWill is alright in all, but this team needs money and has a ton of very important contracts coming up. Why would that not be an option with Jones on the roster and when they just invested a high draft pick at the RB position?
Because you don't throw away team depth for $2.2M which buys a cup of coffee these days. That amount of money has as close to zero impact as you can get in determining our ability to re-sign any players for upcoming seasons. Yeah, if we are perfectly healthy, maybe 3 capable guys is a glut, but there are a million other scenarios where we will be glad we held on to Williams.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8289
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

Yoop wrote:
28 May 2020 07:53
and while 2.2 mil. is a lot of money
It isn't.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
Yoop
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 12336
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

NCF wrote:
28 May 2020 08:12
Yoop wrote:
28 May 2020 07:53
and while 2.2 mil. is a lot of money
It isn't.
not in todays sports world.

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8289
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

Yoop wrote:
28 May 2020 08:29
NCF wrote:
28 May 2020 08:12
Yoop wrote:
28 May 2020 07:53
and while 2.2 mil. is a lot of money
It isn't.
not in todays sports world.
Right. I should maybe have specified that. $2.2M would go a long way in my household, but not for the Packers salary cap.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
Packfntk
Reactions:
Posts: 1759
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 14:09

Post by Packfntk »

NCF wrote:
28 May 2020 07:56
Packfntk wrote:
28 May 2020 07:11
NCF wrote:
27 May 2020 17:09


They are not cutting Williams to save $2.2M on the cap.
Why would that not be an option? Just asking. I think JWill is alright in all, but this team needs money and has a ton of very important contracts coming up. Why would that not be an option with Jones on the roster and when they just invested a high draft pick at the RB position?
Because you don't throw away team depth for $2.2M which buys a cup of coffee these days. That amount of money has as close to zero impact as you can get in determining our ability to re-sign any players for upcoming seasons. Yeah, if we are perfectly healthy, maybe 3 capable guys is a glut, but there are a million other scenarios where we will be glad we held on to Williams.
You think? Man, to save the 2.2M, and if you need depth, or due to injury there are a plethora of backs on the wire, just sitting there that would take the vets minimum that could step in and fill JW role easily IMO.
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8289
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

Packfntk wrote:
28 May 2020 08:40
You think? Man, to save the 2.2M, and if you need depth, or due to injury there are a plethora of backs on the wire, just sitting there that would take the vets minimum that could step in and fill JW role easily IMO.
And what is vet's minimum? $1M? So net savings now down to $1.2M. That is what? 1/5 of a replacement level starter at some positions and about 1/10 of a quality starter. That is about 1/16 of what Kenny Clark will get, maybe 1/8 of what Aaron Jones will get... similar for Corey Linsley. I just don't see where we look back and say, "Ah, thank God we cut Jamaal Williams, or we never would have been able to afford re-signing this guy."
Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
Packfntk
Reactions:
Posts: 1759
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 14:09

Post by Packfntk »

NCF wrote:
28 May 2020 08:46
Packfntk wrote:
28 May 2020 08:40
You think? Man, to save the 2.2M, and if you need depth, or due to injury there are a plethora of backs on the wire, just sitting there that would take the vets minimum that could step in and fill JW role easily IMO.
And what is vet's minimum? $1M? So net savings now down to $1.2M. That is what? 1/5 of a replacement level starter at some positions and about 1/10 of a quality starter. That is about 1/16 of what Kenny Clark will get, maybe 1/8 of what Aaron Jones will get... similar for Corey Linsley. I just don't see where we look back and say, "Ah, thank God we cut Jamaal Williams, or we never would have been able to afford re-signing this guy."
But these are the decisions that GM's and Director of Football Operations have to make. In the grand scheme of things, 1.2M may not seem like much. But when you are up against the cap like we are, these can be savvy moves. make a couple of these moves and you can suddenly afford your guys, don't do them and watch your home grown talent walk out the door or put yourself in a brutal situation cap wise.
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8289
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

Packfntk wrote:
28 May 2020 08:51
NCF wrote:
28 May 2020 08:46
Packfntk wrote:
28 May 2020 08:40
You think? Man, to save the 2.2M, and if you need depth, or due to injury there are a plethora of backs on the wire, just sitting there that would take the vets minimum that could step in and fill JW role easily IMO.
And what is vet's minimum? $1M? So net savings now down to $1.2M. That is what? 1/5 of a replacement level starter at some positions and about 1/10 of a quality starter. That is about 1/16 of what Kenny Clark will get, maybe 1/8 of what Aaron Jones will get... similar for Corey Linsley. I just don't see where we look back and say, "Ah, thank God we cut Jamaal Williams, or we never would have been able to afford re-signing this guy."
But these are the decisions that GM's and Director of Football Operations have to make. In the grand scheme of things, 1.2M may not seem like much. But when you are up against the cap like we are, these can be savvy moves. make a couple of these moves and you can suddenly afford your guys, don't do them and watch your home grown talent walk out the door or put yourself in a brutal situation cap wise.
Well, if we cut 16 of these guys I will concede. Otherwise, I am not buying it.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
Packfntk
Reactions:
Posts: 1759
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 14:09

Post by Packfntk »

NCF wrote:
28 May 2020 08:52
Packfntk wrote:
28 May 2020 08:51
NCF wrote:
28 May 2020 08:46


And what is vet's minimum? $1M? So net savings now down to $1.2M. That is what? 1/5 of a replacement level starter at some positions and about 1/10 of a quality starter. That is about 1/16 of what Kenny Clark will get, maybe 1/8 of what Aaron Jones will get... similar for Corey Linsley. I just don't see where we look back and say, "Ah, thank God we cut Jamaal Williams, or we never would have been able to afford re-signing this guy."
But these are the decisions that GM's and Director of Football Operations have to make. In the grand scheme of things, 1.2M may not seem like much. But when you are up against the cap like we are, these can be savvy moves. make a couple of these moves and you can suddenly afford your guys, don't do them and watch your home grown talent walk out the door or put yourself in a brutal situation cap wise.
Well, if we cut 16 of these guys I will concede. Otherwise, I am not buying it.
Oh, that is a little bit of an overreaction, don't you think? Just discussing making smart business decisions, and cutting corners where you can to save a buck. :lol:
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!

Post Reply