Re: Cobb is back
Posted: 28 Jul 2021 10:36
MVS walked out of the locker room with the team so...
Because there is no source to the rumor. That's why it is a rumor.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑28 Jul 2021 10:17Where do you hear things? It seems you often reference rumors, but I never see them. Like the voided contract with Rodgers stuff.
I still stand by that quote which is what I heard at the time. Just because Rodgers didn't fully get it doesn't mean he didn't want it. And the fact that the "concession" was voiding the final year does show this was part of the issue Rodgers wants resolved.go pak go wrote: ↑26 Jul 2021 15:38So there is talk that Rodgers wants the Packers to essentially void the contract and allow Rodgers to be a free agent after this season in order for Rodgers to come play this year.
I really, really don't want to do that. I would honestly rather have Rodgers retire.
IMO, the worst scenario for the Packers is if Rodgers gets to leave without any compensation in return. We would get a 5th round comp pick because he's old.
so then some blogger, who wouldn't know a piston from his sisters titty asked a far fetched question even insiders don't know, and had no real answer to gave you the impression that it could be valid info, so you brought it, this is about as useful as my info that every QB after slot 1 is a bust candidate only waiting to be exposed,go pak go wrote: ↑28 Jul 2021 11:13Because there is no source to the rumor. That's why it is a rumor.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑28 Jul 2021 10:17Where do you hear things? It seems you often reference rumors, but I never see them. Like the voided contract with Rodgers stuff.
Someone asked about it on a "Chat with Nags" yesterday saying they heard about it.
If I had a source or a tweet I would post it.
That's why I qualified it as a rumor.
And if you are talking about this:
I still stand by that quote which is what I heard at the time. Just because Rodgers didn't fully get it doesn't mean he didn't want it. And the fact that the "concession" was voiding the final year does show this was part of the issue Rodgers wants resolved.go pak go wrote: ↑26 Jul 2021 15:38So there is talk that Rodgers wants the Packers to essentially void the contract and allow Rodgers to be a free agent after this season in order for Rodgers to come play this year.
I really, really don't want to do that. I would honestly rather have Rodgers retire.
IMO, the worst scenario for the Packers is if Rodgers gets to leave without any compensation in return. We would get a 5th round comp pick because he's old.
I wasn't trying to diminish it. I was literally asking where you hear things. So this one, someone brought it up in a Nagler Chat. The "Rodgers wants a void" talk... I also hadn't seen. I'm not saying it needs to be true or anything, but usually rumors have some sort of source; like the house cleaning thing came from someone. The way rumors get to our ears includes some sort of transmission. And You seem to have more methods through which rumors are transmitted to your ears than I do. And I was just wondering how that happens.go pak go wrote: ↑28 Jul 2021 11:13Because there is no source to the rumor. That's why it is a rumor.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑28 Jul 2021 10:17Where do you hear things? It seems you often reference rumors, but I never see them. Like the voided contract with Rodgers stuff.
The difference is I qualify things and say "hey...this doesn't have a source. It's just floating"Yoop wrote: ↑28 Jul 2021 11:29so then some blogger, who wouldn't know a piston from his sisters titty asked a far fetched question even insiders don't know, and had no real answer to gave you the impression that it could be valid info, so you brought it, this is about as useful as my info that every QB after slot 1 is a bust candidate only waiting to be exposed,go pak go wrote: ↑28 Jul 2021 11:13Because there is no source to the rumor. That's why it is a rumor.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑28 Jul 2021 10:17
Where do you hear things? It seems you often reference rumors, but I never see them. Like the voided contract with Rodgers stuff.
Someone asked about it on a "Chat with Nags" yesterday saying they heard about it.
If I had a source or a tweet I would post it.
That's why I qualified it as a rumor.
And if you are talking about this:
I still stand by that quote which is what I heard at the time. Just because Rodgers didn't fully get it doesn't mean he didn't want it. And the fact that the "concession" was voiding the final year does show this was part of the issue Rodgers wants resolved.go pak go wrote: ↑26 Jul 2021 15:38So there is talk that Rodgers wants the Packers to essentially void the contract and allow Rodgers to be a free agent after this season in order for Rodgers to come play this year.
I really, really don't want to do that. I would honestly rather have Rodgers retire.
IMO, the worst scenario for the Packers is if Rodgers gets to leave without any compensation in return. We would get a 5th round comp pick because he's old.
Yeah the void thing I believe was brought up in a McAfee interview? I can't remember.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑28 Jul 2021 11:35I wasn't trying to diminish it. I was literally asking where you hear things. So this one, someone brought it up in a Nagler Chat. The "Rodgers wants a void" talk... I also hadn't seen. I'm not saying it needs to be true or anything, but usually rumors have some sort of source; like the house cleaning thing came from someone. The way rumors get to our ears includes some sort of transmission. And You seem to have more methods through which rumors are transmitted to your ears than I do. And I was just wondering how that happens.go pak go wrote: ↑28 Jul 2021 11:13Because there is no source to the rumor. That's why it is a rumor.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑28 Jul 2021 10:17Where do you hear things? It seems you often reference rumors, but I never see them. Like the voided contract with Rodgers stuff.
It's tough when those are mentioned in podcasts and not tweeted or put in articles. I never listen to those myself. Good to hear stuff form other things. Just let us know where you hear them if you can!go pak go wrote: ↑28 Jul 2021 11:51Yeah the void thing I believe was brought up in a McAfee interview? I can't remember.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑28 Jul 2021 11:35I wasn't trying to diminish it. I was literally asking where you hear things. So this one, someone brought it up in a Nagler Chat. The "Rodgers wants a void" talk... I also hadn't seen. I'm not saying it needs to be true or anything, but usually rumors have some sort of source; like the house cleaning thing came from someone. The way rumors get to our ears includes some sort of transmission. And You seem to have more methods through which rumors are transmitted to your ears than I do. And I was just wondering how that happens.
These rumors I bring in usually come after lunch when I just have interviews or chats playing in the background(while cooking/preparing lunch) and then I bring them here.
His salary was guaranteed but far beyond his worth. They likely would have looked at releasing him after acquiring Miller, had he not been on a guaranteed contract. They got a pick and saved themselves a few million against the cap this year by making the move.
This.