The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
Jarvis Landry wouldn't be terrible for the right price I suppose.Drj820 wrote: ↑18 Mar 2022 11:11thats a pretty ugly list sadlygo pak go wrote: ↑18 Mar 2022 11:04Here is a list of the remaining FA's out there.Yoop wrote: ↑18 Mar 2022 10:53
It is not that hard to replace Adams production, simply find two receivers better then our #2 and #3 receivers that we've had the last 5 years, which should not be that hard to do, take one of these top 4 receivers in this draft and buy a UFA, that wont break the bank.
1. Odell Beckham - Torn ACL. Won't be back until likely December at earliest.
2. Jarvis Landry
3. Ju Ju Smith - has gotten worse each year in the league
4. Jamison Crowder
5. Will Fuller
6. Sammy Watkins
7. Julio Jones
8. AJ Green
9. James Washington
10. Laquon Treadwell
11. Tre'Quan Smith
12. MVS
13. Demarcus Robinson
I’m, has anybody called BS on that tweet yet? That is totally fabricated. Unreal.go pak go wrote: ↑18 Mar 2022 10:121. Reporter reports itAPB wrote: ↑18 Mar 2022 10:01Adams' own agent has confirmed it. What more proof do you need?Yoop wrote: ↑18 Mar 2022 09:39Adams new the Packers couldn't pay there top two players 80 mil. a season and still compete, so did the FO, thats why Adams is a Raider, all this gossip from Adams agents that the Packers where willing to match that offer has not been confirmed to my knowldge, and even if the FO says it, don't make it true, everyone comment I've heard is designed to appease the fan base.
2. Reporter talks to FO who confirms it
3. Agent Confirms it
4. Yoop doesn't believe it
One group has the story wrong. My money is it isn't the guy in the Upper Penninsula who doesn't believe what the agent, reporter or FO said...but does believe this quote from Adams was real.
Yoop wrote: ↑17 Mar 2022 19:32
Ya, weird parting remarks, which player contract was he referring to< Rodgers, Campbell ? who knows, It came down to show me the money so everyone will respect me as the best, or I'am off to Vegas, the Radars, and my new home I bought a month ago when this was all rehearsed, now he's gonna act like some signed player stole his money, Love ya Tae, good luck except when playing us.
seriously who cares if the remark was true, the reality of the situation is, If Rodgers would have accepted 5 mil less per season it could have been used to buffer the demands Adams wanted, still, if Tae wouldn't take less to play here then why should Rodgers.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 09:14I’m, has anybody called BS on that tweet yet? That is totally fabricated. Unreal.go pak go wrote: ↑18 Mar 2022 10:121. Reporter reports it
2. Reporter talks to FO who confirms it
3. Agent Confirms it
4. Yoop doesn't believe it
One group has the story wrong. My money is it isn't the guy in the Upper Penninsula who doesn't believe what the agent, reporter or FO said...but does believe this quote from Adams was real.
Yoop wrote: ↑17 Mar 2022 19:32
Ya, weird parting remarks, which player contract was he referring to< Rodgers, Campbell ? who knows, It came down to show me the money so everyone will respect me as the best, or I'am off to Vegas, the Radars, and my new home I bought a month ago when this was all rehearsed, now he's gonna act like some signed player stole his money, Love ya Tae, good luck except when playing us.
didn't say he couldn't, the timing of the purchase does fit the scenario though, I'am completely convinced that tampering, or players and teams talking and making plans under the radar has been going on for ages, and probably with more then one team, long as these talks are kept quiet the league can't say a thing.
We offered Tae more than the Raiders did so it is obvious Davante wanted to go and play for his favorite team growing up. The big thing we have to do now is try to fill in this major void in our WR room this season. I hope we sign a vet FA or make a trade along with drafting a couple of WRs next month.Yoop wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 09:26seriously who cares if the remark was true, the reality of the situation is, If Rodgers would have accepted 5 mil less per season it could have been used to buffer the demands Adams wanted, still, if Tae wouldn't take less to play here then why should Rodgers.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 09:14I’m, has anybody called BS on that tweet yet? That is totally fabricated. Unreal.go pak go wrote: ↑18 Mar 2022 10:12
1. Reporter reports it
2. Reporter talks to FO who confirms it
3. Agent Confirms it
4. Yoop doesn't believe it
One group has the story wrong. My money is it isn't the guy in the Upper Penninsula who doesn't believe what the agent, reporter or FO said...but does believe this quote from Adams was real.
the no tampering rule means we where not allowed to know if Adams and the Raiders had worked this trade out prior, but the house purchase a month ago leads me to believe it had been.
I'am not so sure about that offer Pugger, teams, agents, sports media can say anything they want because no one will dispute it, it makes us look good, the Raiders desperate, and the agents smelling all rosy for having two teams ready to bank roll there client, we may have offered one year of 28 plus mil., but 5 years of paying two players a 1/3 of the cap is to big a stretch for me to buy into.Pugger wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 10:21We offered Tae more than the Raiders did so it is obvious Davante wanted to go and play for his favorite team growing up. The big thing we have to do now is try to fill in this major void in our WR room this season. I hope we sign a vet FA or make a trade along with drafting a couple of WRs next month.Yoop wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 09:26seriously who cares if the remark was true, the reality of the situation is, If Rodgers would have accepted 5 mil less per season it could have been used to buffer the demands Adams wanted, still, if Tae wouldn't take less to play here then why should Rodgers.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 09:14
I’m, has anybody called BS on that tweet yet? That is totally fabricated. Unreal.
the no tampering rule means we where not allowed to know if Adams and the Raiders had worked this trade out prior, but the house purchase a month ago leads me to believe it had been.
Adams wanted to be taken care of last year, instead he had to play all year with no guarantees about his future and could have hurt himself and never saw the deal he just signed. He still went hard tho and didn’t loaf. I believe it’s pretty clear the team putting him on hold while they waited to work out the Rodgers situation created a rub that pushed Adams out the door. Despite this he never went public and was a good soldier all along.Yoop wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 11:03I'am not so sure about that offer Pugger, teams, agents, sports media can say anything they want because no one will dispute it, it makes us look good, the Raiders desperate, and the agents smelling all rosy for having two teams ready to bank roll there client, we may have offered one year of 28 plus mil., but 5 years of paying two players a 1/3 of the cap is to big a stretch for me to buy into.Pugger wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 10:21We offered Tae more than the Raiders did so it is obvious Davante wanted to go and play for his favorite team growing up. The big thing we have to do now is try to fill in this major void in our WR room this season. I hope we sign a vet FA or make a trade along with drafting a couple of WRs next month.Yoop wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 09:26
seriously who cares if the remark was true, the reality of the situation is, If Rodgers would have accepted 5 mil less per season it could have been used to buffer the demands Adams wanted, still, if Tae wouldn't take less to play here then why should Rodgers.
the no tampering rule means we where not allowed to know if Adams and the Raiders had worked this trade out prior, but the house purchase a month ago leads me to believe it had been.
I said it wont be so hard to replace Tae's production, however we have to draft a ready to play stud, if not two, or buy a quality receiver in UFA, bring back Tonyan or another move TE,
Paco's draft taking both Burks and Olave in round one could make this offense just as, if not even more potent then what we've had the last couple years with Adams imo.
Yeah, playing last year without the extension was a risk that Adams justifiably didn't like. It could've gone horribly wrong, and all smart players want as much guaranteed as possible as early as possible.Drj820 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 12:21Adams wanted to be taken care of last year, instead he had to play all year with no guarantees about his future and could have hurt himself and never saw the deal he just signed. He still went hard tho and didn’t loaf. I believe it’s pretty clear the team putting him on hold while they waited to work out the Rodgers situation created a rub that pushed Adams out the door. Despite this he never went public and was a good soldier all along.Yoop wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 11:03I'am not so sure about that offer Pugger, teams, agents, sports media can say anything they want because no one will dispute it, it makes us look good, the Raiders desperate, and the agents smelling all rosy for having two teams ready to bank roll there client, we may have offered one year of 28 plus mil., but 5 years of paying two players a 1/3 of the cap is to big a stretch for me to buy into.Pugger wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 10:21
We offered Tae more than the Raiders did so it is obvious Davante wanted to go and play for his favorite team growing up. The big thing we have to do now is try to fill in this major void in our WR room this season. I hope we sign a vet FA or make a trade along with drafting a couple of WRs next month.
I said it wont be so hard to replace Tae's production, however we have to draft a ready to play stud, if not two, or buy a quality receiver in UFA, bring back Tonyan or another move TE,
Paco's draft taking both Burks and Olave in round one could make this offense just as, if not even more potent then what we've had the last couple years with Adams imo.
This is no conspiracy
Yeah that’s fair that GBs hands were tied in a way because "they" probably thought they HAD to know what Rodgers was going to do first...I’m just saying I believe being put on the back burner hurt the relationship to the point where Adams decided he would be hitting free agency and moving on. For instance, in Adams mind he could have easily seen himself good enough to believe the org should see him as a team staple just like Bahk was seen as a staple no matter who the QB is. If Rodgers is there, the staple Adams needs to be there. If Love is QB, he needs a staple at WR like Adams. So the org may have felt tied up, but Adams may not have given them that excuse.salmar80 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 12:34Yeah, playing last year without the extension was a risk that Adams justifiably didn't like. It could've gone horribly wrong, and all smart players want as much guaranteed as possible as early as possible.Drj820 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 12:21Adams wanted to be taken care of last year, instead he had to play all year with no guarantees about his future and could have hurt himself and never saw the deal he just signed. He still went hard tho and didn’t loaf. I believe it’s pretty clear the team putting him on hold while they waited to work out the Rodgers situation created a rub that pushed Adams out the door. Despite this he never went public and was a good soldier all along.Yoop wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022 11:03
I'am not so sure about that offer Pugger, teams, agents, sports media can say anything they want because no one will dispute it, it makes us look good, the Raiders desperate, and the agents smelling all rosy for having two teams ready to bank roll there client, we may have offered one year of 28 plus mil., but 5 years of paying two players a 1/3 of the cap is to big a stretch for me to buy into.
I said it wont be so hard to replace Tae's production, however we have to draft a ready to play stud, if not two, or buy a quality receiver in UFA, bring back Tonyan or another move TE,
Paco's draft taking both Burks and Olave in round one could make this offense just as, if not even more potent then what we've had the last couple years with Adams imo.
This is no conspiracy
Thing is, the reason Gutey couldn't extend Adams was Aaron Rodgers. Without AR committing to GB, the Packers extending Adams made no sense.
