Page 65 of 161

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 04 Jun 2023 22:53
by bud fox
Acrobat wrote:
04 Jun 2023 20:13
BF004 wrote:
03 Jun 2023 13:41
Yikes.

Little regression to the mean, we win 2-3 more games.

Lol that's weird that he included percentages with blanks after them.

I could be wrong here but I feel like Aaron Jones did not see the ball nearly enough in the red zone.
Yes.

Dillon gets it way too much. He should be used like the primary back - not a 53/47% split with Dillon.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 06:34
by go pak go
This is likely Aaron Jones's last year in GB. USE HIM. Be selfish with him and put miles on him.

Sign AJ to a cheap 2nd contract and draft a dude in 2024.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 06:55
by Pckfn23
go pak go wrote:
05 Jun 2023 06:34
This is likely Aaron Jones's last year in GB. USE HIM. Be selfish with him and put miles on him.

Sign AJ to a cheap 2nd contract and draft a dude in 2024.
I wouldn't say no to a 3 year rework/extension in the $30 million.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 08:04
by Acrobat
Pckfn23 wrote:
05 Jun 2023 06:55
go pak go wrote:
05 Jun 2023 06:34
This is likely Aaron Jones's last year in GB. USE HIM. Be selfish with him and put miles on him.

Sign AJ to a cheap 2nd contract and draft a dude in 2024.
I wouldn't say no to a 3 year rework/extension in the $30 million.
I am 100% on board with this. I think he's the type of player that could still play well into his early 30's, even if maybe as time goes on he becomes more of a 3rd down back.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 08:15
by Pckfn23
Acrobat wrote:
05 Jun 2023 08:04
Pckfn23 wrote:
05 Jun 2023 06:55
go pak go wrote:
05 Jun 2023 06:34
This is likely Aaron Jones's last year in GB. USE HIM. Be selfish with him and put miles on him.

Sign AJ to a cheap 2nd contract and draft a dude in 2024.
I wouldn't say no to a 3 year rework/extension in the $30 million.
I am 100% on board with this. I think he's the type of player that could still play well into his early 30's, even if maybe as time goes on he becomes more of a 3rd down back.
He has $6.5 million in void money too, so it would take care of that. If we do extend him I might grab his jersey.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 08:19
by go pak go
Pckfn23 wrote:
05 Jun 2023 06:55
go pak go wrote:
05 Jun 2023 06:34
This is likely Aaron Jones's last year in GB. USE HIM. Be selfish with him and put miles on him.

Sign AJ to a cheap 2nd contract and draft a dude in 2024.
I wouldn't say no to a 3 year rework/extension in the $30 million.
Aaron Jones is exactly the type of player and person who would do this. I do however believe only one of AJ or "AJ" will be a Packer next year. Both of them won't be.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 08:23
by Labrev
Jones could also play to become GB's top rushing leader. He needs 3,038 yards to get it.

Probably a little bit out of reach, but worth a shot if we were to keep him around for another few years.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 08:28
by lupedafiasco
go pak go wrote:
05 Jun 2023 08:19
Pckfn23 wrote:
05 Jun 2023 06:55
go pak go wrote:
05 Jun 2023 06:34
This is likely Aaron Jones's last year in GB. USE HIM. Be selfish with him and put miles on him.

Sign AJ to a cheap 2nd contract and draft a dude in 2024.
I wouldn't say no to a 3 year rework/extension in the $30 million.
Aaron Jones is exactly the type of player and person who would do this. I do however believe only one of AJ or "AJ" will be a Packer next year. Both of them won't be.
Right now we can afford one or the other with Love on a relatively cheap deal and all our dead cap money coming off the books this year.

I would personally drop both. Paying RBs in the NFL just doesn’t equal success. You just need a competent runner who can get 4 yards and not turn the ball over. Look at what the Chiefs just did with a rookie RB.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 08:42
by YoHoChecko
lupedafiasco wrote:
05 Jun 2023 08:28

I would personally drop both. Paying RBs in the NFL just doesn’t equal success. You just need a competent runner who can get 4 yards and not turn the ball over. Look at what the Chiefs just did with a rookie RB.
My head says this. But my heart loves Aaron Jones

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 08:42
by Acrobat
Pckfn23 wrote:
05 Jun 2023 08:15
Acrobat wrote:
05 Jun 2023 08:04
Pckfn23 wrote:
05 Jun 2023 06:55


I wouldn't say no to a 3 year rework/extension in the $30 million.
I am 100% on board with this. I think he's the type of player that could still play well into his early 30's, even if maybe as time goes on he becomes more of a 3rd down back.
He has $6.5 million in void money too, so it would take care of that. If we do extend him I might grab his jersey.
I grabbed an alternate jersey last year and was a little concerned that he might be gone soon, but also realized that he's one of those players where I can still wear his jersey to a game after he's gone and not feel any shame.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 08:58
by Yoop
YoHoChecko wrote:
05 Jun 2023 08:42
lupedafiasco wrote:
05 Jun 2023 08:28

I would personally drop both. Paying RBs in the NFL just doesn’t equal success. You just need a competent runner who can get 4 yards and not turn the ball over. Look at what the Chiefs just did with a rookie RB.
My head says this. But my heart loves Aaron Jones
AJ and AJ gained 2500 yrds last year, relatively speaking both are low mileage RB's and play in a system that depends on RB production, I'd rework both contracts and keep on trucken a couple more seasons, add a draft pick, but I wouldn't count on him till he's proven himself prior to cutting either of the AJ's first, production is what ya pay for

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 10:22
by go pak go
Yoop wrote:
05 Jun 2023 08:58
YoHoChecko wrote:
05 Jun 2023 08:42
lupedafiasco wrote:
05 Jun 2023 08:28

I would personally drop both. Paying RBs in the NFL just doesn’t equal success. You just need a competent runner who can get 4 yards and not turn the ball over. Look at what the Chiefs just did with a rookie RB.
My head says this. But my heart loves Aaron Jones
AJ and AJ gained 2500 yrds last year, relatively speaking both are low mileage RB's and play in a system that depends on RB production, I'd rework both contracts and keep on trucken a couple more seasons, add a draft pick, but I wouldn't count on him till he's proven himself prior to cutting either of the AJ's first, production is what ya pay for
AJ Dillon is a UFA next year so there is no contract to rework.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 21:38
by BF004

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 22:49
by wallyuwl
BF004 wrote:
05 Jun 2023 21:38
:dunno:

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 23:35
by bud fox
lupedafiasco wrote:
05 Jun 2023 08:28
.

I would personally drop both. Paying RBs in the NFL just doesn’t equal success. You just need a competent runner who can get 4 yards and not turn the ball over. Look at what the Chiefs just did with a rookie RB.
Agree - look what Jamall Williams did last game against us.

Also we will need the money if we going to be paying Love 40-50m per in 2 years time.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 05 Jun 2023 23:51
by Drj820
Here’s the deal about RBs…if they just run the ball…yes they are expendable

If they run the ball and pass block well, they set themselves apart and are a little harder to replace.

But if they run the ball, pass block, and they are a weapon in the pass game…then they have a lot of value.

Because at that point you aren’t paying a “running back”, you are paying a playmaker. And playmakers aren’t so easy to find.

Running backs that can be pass catchers and get YAC are not easily replaced

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 06 Jun 2023 05:50
by salmar80
Drj820 wrote:
05 Jun 2023 23:51
Here’s the deal about RBs…if they just run the ball…yes they are expendable

If they run the ball and pass block well, they set themselves apart and are a little harder to replace.

But if they run the ball, pass block, and they are a weapon in the pass game…then they have a lot of value.

Because at that point you aren’t paying a “running back”, you are paying a playmaker. And playmakers aren’t so easy to find.

Running backs that can be pass catchers and get YAC are not easily replaced
I agree to a point. If you need a rusher, no need to invest much, colleges churn out so many. But few are also well-versed in pass pro and as catchers.

It took Aaron Jones a year to become a decent blocker and two to become a receiving threat. AJ Dillon still makes a lot of mistakes as blocker.

I'd still hate to pay tippy-top RB money. With Aaron Jones, you'd essentially pay to have a larger playbook. With him, you have the option of flexing a RB wide.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 06 Jun 2023 07:26
by Drj820
As long as Aaron Jones is a great teammate and leader, and is a weapon in the pass game he is extremely valuable and hard to replace.

The packers job will be to determine when he is going to physically decline. He’s a small guy. He will lose value when he is less of a playmaker.

But while he has the physical skills he has, he is worth every Penny if actually used

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 06 Jun 2023 09:10
by RingoCStarrQB
BF004 wrote:
05 Jun 2023 21:38
I'd take Frazier over Barry and LaCoach in a fraction of a brain synapse transmission and reception. This ain't a head scratcher. :clap:

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 06 Jun 2023 09:26
by lupedafiasco
Drj820 wrote:
05 Jun 2023 23:51
Here’s the deal about RBs…if they just run the ball…yes they are expendable

If they run the ball and pass block well, they set themselves apart and are a little harder to replace.

But if they run the ball, pass block, and they are a weapon in the pass game…then they have a lot of value.

Because at that point you aren’t paying a “running back”, you are paying a playmaker. And playmakers aren’t so easy to find.

Running backs that can be pass catchers and get YAC are not easily replaced
Sure they can. Jerick McKinnon is 30 and made less than 1M as a pass catching specialist. Anytime you pay a RB and draft one highly you are making a mistake. We did both.