This has gone on a bit too long. Someone in this thread stated they wanted a share but it was not in their budget at this time. I will purchase it for them as a Christmas Present. Was it Crazy Legs? Cant remember. Pm me.
6th Green Bay Packers stock sale Nov 16th $300
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
No one would be able to tell you to shut up for quite some time if you spread christmas cheer in that way. It was lebrev
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
I hope he pms meDrj820 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2021 15:47No one would be able to tell you to shut up for quite some time if you spread christmas cheer in that way. It was lebrev
Crazylegs Starks said they would get one for their dad as a Christmas present but it's outside his budget. Yeah, I said I would buy one if I had the cash to spare, but the dad should definitely get priority over me.
**edit** no wait I think he ended up buying.
**edit** no wait I think he ended up buying.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
Good lord. Nothing is easy here.
Because teams don't give up their home games vs the Packers. The Packers on the road is a guaranteed sell out and the home team is not willing to put that in London. It's simple economics. it's better to have a crappier team play the London home team where attendance will be in the 80,000's anyways.Raptorman wrote: ↑17 Nov 2021 14:01So why are the Packers the only team that hasn't played overseas? Oh yeah, they are special. Even New England has been 3 times.salmar80 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2021 13:11I don't think the Packers could decline if the league scheduled them for an overseas game. Not the team's fault the league hasn't done that. The international series started in 2007, and the Packers have been a fantastic at filling stadiums in away games in the US during that period. I'm sure if we hit a period of tough times, and that draw is lost, overseas games would follow.
Home teams like St. Louis, early LA, Tampa Bay, Jacksonville, San Diego/LAC, Miami, Cincy, Atlanta don't sell out games easily. There is no way in hell they are giving up a Packers game to take it over seas.
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4173
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4173
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
How does this relate to the Packers stock sale? Scratching my head trying to figure out the tie to the St Louis Rams.go pak go wrote: ↑17 Nov 2021 17:20Because teams don't give up their home games vs the Packers. The Packers on the road is a guaranteed sell out and the home team is not willing to put that in London. It's simple economics. it's better to have a crappier team play the London home team where attendance will be in the 80,000's anyways.Raptorman wrote: ↑17 Nov 2021 14:01So why are the Packers the only team that hasn't played overseas? Oh yeah, they are special. Even New England has been 3 times.salmar80 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2021 13:11
I don't think the Packers could decline if the league scheduled them for an overseas game. Not the team's fault the league hasn't done that. The international series started in 2007, and the Packers have been a fantastic at filling stadiums in away games in the US during that period. I'm sure if we hit a period of tough times, and that draw is lost, overseas games would follow.
Home teams like St. Louis, early LA, Tampa Bay, Jacksonville, San Diego/LAC, Miami, Cincy, Atlanta don't sell out games easily. There is no way in hell they are giving up a Packers game to take it over seas.
It's complicatedRingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑17 Nov 2021 20:49How does this relate to the Packers stock sale? Scratching my head trying to figure out the tie to the St Louis Rams.go pak go wrote: ↑17 Nov 2021 17:20Because teams don't give up their home games vs the Packers. The Packers on the road is a guaranteed sell out and the home team is not willing to put that in London. It's simple economics. it's better to have a crappier team play the London home team where attendance will be in the 80,000's anyways.
Home teams like St. Louis, early LA, Tampa Bay, Jacksonville, San Diego/LAC, Miami, Cincy, Atlanta don't sell out games easily. There is no way in hell they are giving up a Packers game to take it over seas.
Just heard on mad dog sports radio where they were hating on the stock that the org sold 110k shares in 48 hours.
Also same mad dog station had a commercial for buying stock telling people to go to packersstock dot com. That’s the first official marketing I’ve seen.
Also same mad dog station had a commercial for buying stock telling people to go to packersstock dot com. That’s the first official marketing I’ve seen.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
I don't think you are hearing these words on the screen right...
No, read it on JS online
GREEN BAY – The Green Bay Packers have sold $36.7 million in shares in the first day and a-half of the team's sixth stock sale.
Packers fans scooped up 110,000 shares of the NFL's only publicly-owned team between Tuesday morning and Wednesday evening. About 100,000 purchases were made.
- Crazylegs Starks
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3719
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 21:50
- Location: Northern WI
Yes, I did end up getting my Dad one. (Shh, don't tell him!) I guess I should've been more clear: It's the Xmas budget that I wrecked, but I have other funds I can siphon off.
“We didn’t lose the game; we just ran out of time.”
- Vince Lombardi
- Vince Lombardi
One last chance to go back in the thread and discover the joke on your own.Yoop wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021 13:00No, read it on JS online
GREEN BAY – The Green Bay Packers have sold $36.7 million in shares in the first day and a-half of the team's sixth stock sale.
Packers fans scooped up 110,000 shares of the NFL's only publicly-owned team between Tuesday morning and Wednesday evening. About 100,000 purchases were made.
awe you twicked mesalmar80 wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021 13:06One last chance to go back in the thread and discover the joke on your own.Yoop wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021 13:00No, read it on JS online
GREEN BAY – The Green Bay Packers have sold $36.7 million in shares in the first day and a-half of the team's sixth stock sale.
Packers fans scooped up 110,000 shares of the NFL's only publicly-owned team between Tuesday morning and Wednesday evening. About 100,000 purchases were made.
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4173
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
That's what Murphy said about Rodgers. And no we're not talking about the Murphy that had 20 interceptions playing DB for the Packers wearing #37. And no we're not talking about Richard or Amari. Many headscratchers to deal with here.Yoop wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021 05:55It's complicatedRingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑17 Nov 2021 20:49How does this relate to the Packers stock sale? Scratching my head trying to figure out the tie to the St Louis Rams.go pak go wrote: ↑17 Nov 2021 17:20
Because teams don't give up their home games vs the Packers. The Packers on the road is a guaranteed sell out and the home team is not willing to put that in London. It's simple economics. it's better to have a crappier team play the London home team where attendance will be in the 80,000's anyways.
Home teams like St. Louis, early LA, Tampa Bay, Jacksonville, San Diego/LAC, Miami, Cincy, Atlanta don't sell out games easily. There is no way in hell they are giving up a Packers game to take it over seas.
keep your eye on the ball, Ringo. Youve got a pixel in the jumbotron to claim as your ownRingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021 18:01That's what Murphy said about Rodgers. And no we're not talking about the Murphy that had 20 interceptions playing DB for the Packers wearing #37. And no we're not talking about Richard or Amari. Many headscratchers to deal with here.Yoop wrote: ↑18 Nov 2021 05:55It's complicatedRingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑17 Nov 2021 20:49
How does this relate to the Packers stock sale? Scratching my head trying to figure out the tie to the St Louis Rams.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur