Re: Packers @ Vikings GDT: Sunday, Dec. 31st, 7:20 PM CST
Posted: 30 Dec 2023 17:44
We hold on and win 23-20 because they blow a 45 yarder (FG) to tie to put into OT. Doubs has his best day as a PRO
The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
Stokes wasn't a popular pick on this board pre-draft. Your opinion wasn't isolated.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 18:16It seems like just yesterday I said Stokes was not only not the best CB available, he wasn’t even the best CB available coming out of his school. I was chastised for it. Hmmm.
I got isolated by the forum bitch boy.go pak go wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 22:30Stokes wasn't a popular pick on this board pre-draft. Your opinion wasn't isolated.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 18:16It seems like just yesterday I said Stokes was not only not the best CB available, he wasn’t even the best CB available coming out of his school. I was chastised for it. Hmmm.
That being said, Stokes had a fantastic rookie season and very much gave reason to be excited. But a sophomore slump and then the injuries...I fear his days are numbered with the dropoff in speed. Speed is all he had.
Is it really necessary to insult people without provocation?lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 23:20I got isolated by the forum bitch boy.go pak go wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 22:30Stokes wasn't a popular pick on this board pre-draft. Your opinion wasn't isolated.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 18:16It seems like just yesterday I said Stokes was not only not the best CB available, he wasn’t even the best CB available coming out of his school. I was chastised for it. Hmmm.
That being said, Stokes had a fantastic rookie season and very much gave reason to be excited. But a sophomore slump and then the injuries...I fear his days are numbered with the dropoff in speed. Speed is all he had.
People just quoted his size and combine numbers. I said over and over pre combine he was a late 2nd/early 3rd. This org learned nothing from King.
I’ve said a few times Stokes had a good year for a rookie but it wasn’t a good year for a CB by any means.
You’d think you’d be in a better frame of mind coming off the fantasy championship you mentioned in the other thread. Instead, it’s the same poor me victimhood nonsense and unprovoked lashing out at posters that get you “cancelled by the forum elites”.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 23:20I got isolated by the forum bitch boy.go pak go wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 22:30Stokes wasn't a popular pick on this board pre-draft. Your opinion wasn't isolated.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 18:16It seems like just yesterday I said Stokes was not only not the best CB available, he wasn’t even the best CB available coming out of his school. I was chastised for it. Hmmm.
That being said, Stokes had a fantastic rookie season and very much gave reason to be excited. But a sophomore slump and then the injuries...I fear his days are numbered with the dropoff in speed. Speed is all he had.
People just quoted his size and combine numbers. I said over and over pre combine he was a late 2nd/early 3rd. This org learned nothing from King.
I’ve said a few times Stokes had a good year for a rookie but it wasn’t a good year for a CB by any means.
come on man, Stokes was just as good as Douglas in 2021, 14 PD's and 50 some tackles, you have two category's for players, they suck or there greatlupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 23:20I got isolated by the forum bitch boy.go pak go wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 22:30Stokes wasn't a popular pick on this board pre-draft. Your opinion wasn't isolated.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 18:16It seems like just yesterday I said Stokes was not only not the best CB available, he wasn’t even the best CB available coming out of his school. I was chastised for it. Hmmm.
That being said, Stokes had a fantastic rookie season and very much gave reason to be excited. But a sophomore slump and then the injuries...I fear his days are numbered with the dropoff in speed. Speed is all he had.
People just quoted his size and combine numbers. I said over and over pre combine he was a late 2nd/early 3rd. This org learned nothing from King.
I’ve said a few times Stokes had a good year for a rookie but it wasn’t a good year for a CB by any means.
viewtopic.php?p=52589#p52589lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 18:16It seems like just yesterday I said Stokes was not only not the best CB available, he wasn’t even the best CB available coming out of his school. I was chastised for it. Hmmm.
Oh please. Pre draft nobody was talking up Stokes. In fact hardly any research was done on Stokes on this forum because we all dismissed him. We all liked his teammate Campbell. YoHo was very vocal of not being excited on Stokes to the Packers in 2021.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 23:20I got isolated by the forum bitch boy.go pak go wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 22:30Stokes wasn't a popular pick on this board pre-draft. Your opinion wasn't isolated.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 18:16It seems like just yesterday I said Stokes was not only not the best CB available, he wasn’t even the best CB available coming out of his school. I was chastised for it. Hmmm.
That being said, Stokes had a fantastic rookie season and very much gave reason to be excited. But a sophomore slump and then the injuries...I fear his days are numbered with the dropoff in speed. Speed is all he had.
People just quoted his size and combine numbers. I said over and over pre combine he was a late 2nd/early 3rd. This org learned nothing from King.
I’ve said a few times Stokes had a good year for a rookie but it wasn’t a good year for a CB by any means.
and this from BSA says Stokes was better then most here gave him credit for, and this kid had a lousy long term injury, we need to give him more playing time to get back to form, he was pretty good prior to that lis francBF004 wrote: ↑31 Dec 2023 08:44viewtopic.php?p=52589#p52589lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 18:16It seems like just yesterday I said Stokes was not only not the best CB available, he wasn’t even the best CB available coming out of his school. I was chastised for it. Hmmm.
This was one of your best takes ever though.
I agree. We won't know what he lost until a couple of games into next season. We should be glad that he has a few games this season to knock the rust off.Yoop wrote: ↑31 Dec 2023 10:18and this from BSA says Stokes was better then most here gave him credit for, and this kid had a lousy long term injury, we need to give him more playing time to get back to form, he was pretty good prior to that lis francBF004 wrote: ↑31 Dec 2023 08:44viewtopic.php?p=52589#p52589lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023 18:16It seems like just yesterday I said Stokes was not only not the best CB available, he wasn’t even the best CB available coming out of his school. I was chastised for it. Hmmm.
This was one of your best takes ever though.
Stokes made second-team All-Southeastern Conference in 2019 and first team in 2020.
If I hear MLF say one more time after this game, that "I should've coached them better" I'll personally come to GB and walk him out of the building. This is a money game. MLF is in his fourth season as HC. He needs to coach better TODAY.Drj820 wrote: ↑31 Dec 2023 10:03Well, what better time to have two cbs out than to face a first time starter rookie qb.
I have a feeling he may do more damage with his legs than his arm. If we are lucky.
Vikings have cooked up a good defense. They have a great DC.
No reason we shouldn’t win, but I don’t expect it to be easy.
I think the Vikings coach is a good coach. I would say whatever coach has the best performance will win the game
I expect the Packers to score a sufficient number of points to win the game. With this starting secondary, we are going to need to be able to pressure the QB with our front 4. If we can't do that, we probably lose.Drj820 wrote: ↑31 Dec 2023 10:03Well, what better time to have two cbs out than to face a first time starter rookie qb.
I have a feeling he may do more damage with his legs than his arm. If we are lucky.
Vikings have cooked up a good defense. They have a great DC.
No reason we shouldn’t win, but I don’t expect it to be easy.
I think the Vikings coach is a good coach. I would say whatever coach has the best performance will win the game
5th season, and his only demerit is keeping a cord to long, if that was reason enough to fire him ya'd have to fire half the coaches in the league, he gambled that Barry's schemes would work, he was wrong, still thats no reason to dump a coach who has actually done well considering the youth at the skill position and not having a featured RB on offense.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑31 Dec 2023 11:04If I hear MLF say one more time after this game, that "I should've coached them better" I'll personally come to GB and walk him out of the building. This is a money game. MLF is in his fourth season as HC. He needs to coach better TODAY.Drj820 wrote: ↑31 Dec 2023 10:03Well, what better time to have two cbs out than to face a first time starter rookie qb.
I have a feeling he may do more damage with his legs than his arm. If we are lucky.
Vikings have cooked up a good defense. They have a great DC.
No reason we shouldn’t win, but I don’t expect it to be easy.
I think the Vikings coach is a good coach. I would say whatever coach has the best performance will win the game
His first start was in Atlanta.Drj820 wrote: ↑31 Dec 2023 10:03Well, what better time to have two cbs out than to face a first time starter rookie qb.
I have a feeling he may do more damage with his legs than his arm. If we are lucky.
Vikings have cooked up a good defense. They have a great DC.
No reason we shouldn’t win, but I don’t expect it to be easy.
I think the Vikings coach is a good coach. I would say whatever coach has the best performance will win the game
His point remains valid. This is kind of game a good coach is paid to put up a strong performance.Yoop wrote: ↑31 Dec 2023 11:315th season, and his only demerit is keeping a cord to long, if that was reason enough to fire him ya'd have to fire half the coaches in the league, he gambled that Barry's schemes would work, he was wrong, still thats no reason to dump a coach who has actually done well considering the youth at the skill position and not having a featured RB on offense.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑31 Dec 2023 11:04If I hear MLF say one more time after this game, that "I should've coached them better" I'll personally come to GB and walk him out of the building. This is a money game. MLF is in his fourth season as HC. He needs to coach better TODAY.Drj820 wrote: ↑31 Dec 2023 10:03Well, what better time to have two cbs out than to face a first time starter rookie qb.
I have a feeling he may do more damage with his legs than his arm. If we are lucky.
Vikings have cooked up a good defense. They have a great DC.
No reason we shouldn’t win, but I don’t expect it to be easy.
I think the Vikings coach is a good coach. I would say whatever coach has the best performance will win the game