Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST
Posted: 06 Sep 2021 13:30
and what is the significance of LG versus right RG again for a right hand throwing QB?
The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
and what is the significance of LG versus right RG again for a right hand throwing QB?
Good news on Z. I think he plays on a snap count. Never know though with the leagues most conservative medical staff.Za'Darius Smith (55) is indeed back at practice doing some group work. Matt LaFleur said he's "hopeful" the OLB's back issues are cleared up in time for Sunday's opener vs. the Saints. DT Tyler Lancaster (elbow) also has returned. S Vernon Scott (hamstring) is the only non-participant in this light practice.
No significance at all. It is simply that he has played mostly at RG in the preseason. Why would the Packers give him 3 games of experience in the preseason at RG and then move him to LG for the season starter. He is a rookie after all, why needlessly complicate his life?
I agree, just my opinion but I think the LG has to be more athletic to take on combo rushers, the L is the weak side more often then not so he and the LT have to protect blind side rushers for a right handed QB.Labrev wrote: ↑06 Sep 2021 13:39My gut says that coach goes with the experienced vet over the sophomore player at LG, especially given two first-year players starting the other two interior OL spots. So Patrick over JRJ, even though I feel like Patrick is not as good an LG than RG for some reason, whereas LG seems to be Runyan's best position.
I feel like the LG tends to go up against more athletic DTs and therefore calls for a somewhat more athletic IOL than Patrick, although he does more-or-less get the job done there. Still, Runyan next to Myers and Newman would be a lot of inexperience along the interior, and I doubt MLF would be comfortable with that.
It's his back. I hope they stay as conservative as hell.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑06 Sep 2021 13:49Good news on Z. I think he plays on a snap count. Never know though with the leagues most conservative medical staff.Za'Darius Smith (55) is indeed back at practice doing some group work. Matt LaFleur said he's "hopeful" the OLB's back issues are cleared up in time for Sunday's opener vs. the Saints. DT Tyler Lancaster (elbow) also has returned. S Vernon Scott (hamstring) is the only non-participant in this light practice.
I would agree with NCF's assessment, at least for Cobb. I personally think that AR would like nothing more than to welcome RC back with a TD.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑05 Sep 2021 13:28A lot of unlikely scores.
I would say Adams x2, Tonyan, and Jones.
Not sure how often we'll see them together. But I fully expect Dillon to be used at least as much as Jamaal was. It keeps both guys fresh and allows you to ride the hot hand that game. Hill will be used sparingly early unless there is an injury. But I expect he'll get his chances as well.Drj820 wrote: ↑07 Sep 2021 10:45Im really interested to see how coach divides up the RB duties. I would really like to see Jones and Dillon on the field at the same time. We have 3 VERY capable backs, when they are all healthy, they really all "deserve" carries. Yet Jones got paid to be the lead dog, and Dillon sits as a 2nd round draft pick in his second year. Which is very high for a RB and would typically also justify getting tons of carries.
Im interested to see if Jones and Dillon do what Jones and Jamaal did where basically they rotate series with Jones getting majority of the series, or if its a true 50/50 split based on series, or if they are running on and off the field throughout the series rotating play by play. I feel play by play would be the hardest for defenses to adjust to, just based on their differences of style...but we did not see this much last year with Jones and Jamaal.
I also hope to see them both on the field at the same time, and I think Hill can help the offense too.
Not a bad problem to have as long as everyone keeps a positive, team first attitude, but we have a CROWD back there.
Yeah I agree even tho Hill is talented, his carries will be tough to come by if everyone is healthy. That said, Dillon is a second round pick in year 2...I would be shocked if he was content to carry the ball as little as Jamaal did. Then, that of course cuts into Jones production...but maybe he wont care because he seems to be such a team guy and is already paid. I just think Dillon will be owed a lot more carries than we gave Jamaal. In my opinion, the dynamic will be interesting to watch play out. Lots of resources put into that position and guys need their carries to get rolling.paco wrote: ↑07 Sep 2021 10:48Not sure how often we'll see them together. But I fully expect Dillon to be used at least as much as Jamaal was. It keeps both guys fresh and allows you to ride the hot hand that game. Hill will be used sparingly early unless there is an injury. But I expect he'll get his chances as well.Drj820 wrote: ↑07 Sep 2021 10:45Im really interested to see how coach divides up the RB duties. I would really like to see Jones and Dillon on the field at the same time. We have 3 VERY capable backs, when they are all healthy, they really all "deserve" carries. Yet Jones got paid to be the lead dog, and Dillon sits as a 2nd round draft pick in his second year. Which is very high for a RB and would typically also justify getting tons of carries.
Im interested to see if Jones and Dillon do what Jones and Jamaal did where basically they rotate series with Jones getting majority of the series, or if its a true 50/50 split based on series, or if they are running on and off the field throughout the series rotating play by play. I feel play by play would be the hardest for defenses to adjust to, just based on their differences of style...but we did not see this much last year with Jones and Jamaal.
I also hope to see them both on the field at the same time, and I think Hill can help the offense too.
Not a bad problem to have as long as everyone keeps a positive, team first attitude, but we have a CROWD back there.
I'm sure Dillon would love to be the lead back. But the truth is they gave Jones a bunch of money and he's #1. I think Dillon is ok with that. Jamaal averaged 125 carries over his 4 years here. I think AJ will be ok with that especially after only 46 last year.Drj820 wrote: ↑07 Sep 2021 10:52Yeah I agree even tho Hill is talented, his carries will be tough to come by if everyone is healthy. That said, Dillon is a second round pick in year 2...I would be shocked if he was content to carry the ball as little as Jamaal did. Then, that of course cuts into Jones production...but maybe he wont care because he seems to be such a team guy and is already paid. I just think Dillon will be owed a lot more carries than we gave Jamaal. In my opinion, the dynamic will be interesting to watch play out. Lots of resources put into that position and guys need their carries to get rolling.paco wrote: ↑07 Sep 2021 10:48Not sure how often we'll see them together. But I fully expect Dillon to be used at least as much as Jamaal was. It keeps both guys fresh and allows you to ride the hot hand that game. Hill will be used sparingly early unless there is an injury. But I expect he'll get his chances as well.Drj820 wrote: ↑07 Sep 2021 10:45Im really interested to see how coach divides up the RB duties. I would really like to see Jones and Dillon on the field at the same time. We have 3 VERY capable backs, when they are all healthy, they really all "deserve" carries. Yet Jones got paid to be the lead dog, and Dillon sits as a 2nd round draft pick in his second year. Which is very high for a RB and would typically also justify getting tons of carries.
Im interested to see if Jones and Dillon do what Jones and Jamaal did where basically they rotate series with Jones getting majority of the series, or if its a true 50/50 split based on series, or if they are running on and off the field throughout the series rotating play by play. I feel play by play would be the hardest for defenses to adjust to, just based on their differences of style...but we did not see this much last year with Jones and Jamaal.
I also hope to see them both on the field at the same time, and I think Hill can help the offense too.
Not a bad problem to have as long as everyone keeps a positive, team first attitude, but we have a CROWD back there.
We have a guy on a second contract (rare for the position, for the Packers), and a 2nd round pick (high for the position, when you have another guy on a second contract). Its not that strange.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑07 Sep 2021 12:20BTW, the Packers have 3 RBs which cost $6.3 million against the cap, good for 16th in RB spending this year and just below the average of $6.9 million, according to spotrac.
We have spent a 2nd, 5th, and 7th round pick on those three players.
The notion that we have "a lot invested" at RB is a very strange one.
What I'm saying is that none of those things are rare. I have no idea what you guys are talking about. RBs get taken in rounds 1 or 2 routinely. RBs sign second contracts routinely. The Packers have kept a perfectly reasonable amount of RBs on second contracts.Drj820 wrote: ↑07 Sep 2021 12:27We have a guy on a second contract (rare for the position, for the Packers), and a 2nd round pick (high for the position, when you have another guy on a second contract). Its not that strange.
Anyways, I will be interested to see how the carries are divvied up. Both or all three deserve the ball, yet only one ball.