Re: Rams @ Packers GDT: Monday, Dec. 19th, 7:15 PM CST
Posted: 19 Dec 2022 22:41
Only rodgers would publically throw his rookie receiver under the bus after a victory
The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
it was right to him, he was forced to catch it, sarcasm alert, Douglas makes my list as one of the most disappointing players on defense this year, some of the others are, Alexander, Savage, Amos, Lowry, and the entire NFL referee fraternity
Going into Miami next week is not going to be easy. They have a pretty good team. One positive for the Pack is it will not be warm down here next weekend. The forecast high in Miami next Sunday, as of right now, will only be 58° (the normal highs here in late December are in the upper 70s).
It wasn’t even going to be a td if he caught it. Rodgers just wanted the world to know it wasn’t his fault. Doucher.
It’s like rodgers expects rookies to know what he knows after he’s been in the league for almost two decades. Shocking we have 8 lossesgo pak go wrote: ↑19 Dec 2022 22:54Found it ironic that an article on Rodgers strange hand signals and "two offenses" comes out and then Rodgers throws a pick
(Lazard definitely did the right thing) and yells at Watson for not being in his page.
Maybe when everyone else has a hard time with you Rodgers....it isn't the WRs who are actually the problem.
Yes, but the Rams' OL is a mess. We really miss Gary.
funny how the hand signals worked well for 15 years and all of a sudden there to complicated, if there is any one thing that pops out week in and week out is just how poorly this team is coached on both sides of the ball, that or players like Douglas just don't care, and it's not just him, we see plenty of different players doing dumb stuff and acting like college players, Watson has to pay attention, and the ball was already out of Rodgers hand with the Lazard mis cue, your so quick to blame Rodgers, when he actually had a good game.go pak go wrote: ↑19 Dec 2022 22:54Found it ironic that an article on Rodgers strange hand signals and "two offenses" comes out and then Rodgers throws a pick
(Lazard definitely did the right thing) and yells at Watson for not being in his page.
Maybe when everyone else has a hard time with you Rodgers....it isn't the WRs who are actually the problem.
You don’t think having three rookies at WR is a reason to simplify hand signals? Of course more advanced stuff worked better with Adams, James Jones, cobb, driver, jordy, Jennings etcYoop wrote: ↑19 Dec 2022 23:08funny how the hand signals worked well for 15 years and all of a sudden there to complicated, if there is any one thing that pops out week in and week out is just how poorly this team is coached on both sides of the ball, that or players like Douglas just don't care, and it's not just him, we see plenty of different players doing dumb stuff and acting like college players, Watson has to pay attention, and the ball was already out of Rodgers hand with the Lazard mis cue, your so quick to blame Rodgers, when he actually had a good game.go pak go wrote: ↑19 Dec 2022 22:54Found it ironic that an article on Rodgers strange hand signals and "two offenses" comes out and then Rodgers throws a pick
(Lazard definitely did the right thing) and yells at Watson for not being in his page.
Maybe when everyone else has a hard time with you Rodgers....it isn't the WRs who are actually the problem.
you don't know that, he might have got in, and it wasn't his fault, it was WATSONs fault, with so much blame every week being thrown at Rodgers it's probably a natural reaction to become defensive, I love how you and others want to defend these rookies and whine about Rodgers.
right, Nixon is great at setting up the wedge blocking though, got to give him that, but then the blocking has been better too, I think a lot of credit should go to Bisaccia
Who cares if it was watsons fault? It’s quite obvious Watson wasn’t on the same page as his QB. My point was just that Rodgers just HAD to make sure we all knew that, and that I’ve never seen a qb throw his receiver under the bus after a win.Yoop wrote: ↑19 Dec 2022 23:14you don't know that, he might have got in, and it wasn't his fault, it was WATSONs fault, with so much blame every week being thrown at Rodgers it's probably a natural reaction to become defensive, I love how you and others want to defend these rookies and whine about Rodgers.
and what makes you think there complicated? am I missing some speech where Rodgers or Lafluer explained the complexity of our hand signals? your making it sound as though each player has to memorize a doz. different hand signals. in reality it's probably 2 maybe 3, it's the receivers job to watch for his hand signal, Rodgers was telling Watson he was the first read, which translates to be ready, there was nothing complicated about that.Drj820 wrote: ↑19 Dec 2022 23:10You don’t think having three rookies at WR is a reason to simplify hand signals? Of course more advanced stuff worked better with Adams, James Jones, cobb, driver, jordy, Jennings etcYoop wrote: ↑19 Dec 2022 23:08funny how the hand signals worked well for 15 years and all of a sudden there to complicated, if there is any one thing that pops out week in and week out is just how poorly this team is coached on both sides of the ball, that or players like Douglas just don't care, and it's not just him, we see plenty of different players doing dumb stuff and acting like college players, Watson has to pay attention, and the ball was already out of Rodgers hand with the Lazard mis cue, your so quick to blame Rodgers, when he actually had a good game.go pak go wrote: ↑19 Dec 2022 22:54Found it ironic that an article on Rodgers strange hand signals and "two offenses" comes out and then Rodgers throws a pick
(Lazard definitely did the right thing) and yells at Watson for not being in his page.
Maybe when everyone else has a hard time with you Rodgers....it isn't the WRs who are actually the problem.
It happens all the time, and it was good natured, He was asked about the play and gave a direct answer, hell Rodgers never had to tell me anything, I new Watson screwed up, just as well as I know even the best of receivers and QB screw pass route, or pitch points, these guys don't have mental telepathy, yet Rodgers gets the blame.Drj820 wrote: ↑19 Dec 2022 23:18Who cares if it was watsons fault? It’s quite obvious Watson wasn’t on the same page as his QB. My point was just that Rodgers just HAD to make sure we all knew that, and that I’ve never seen a qb throw his receiver under the bus after a win.Yoop wrote: ↑19 Dec 2022 23:14you don't know that, he might have got in, and it wasn't his fault, it was WATSONs fault, with so much blame every week being thrown at Rodgers it's probably a natural reaction to become defensive, I love how you and others want to defend these rookies and whine about Rodgers.