Page 12 of 130
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 30 Jan 2023 16:13
by Yoop
williewasgreat wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023 15:54
TheSkeptic wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023 14:03
Yoop wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023 13:21
well then quit being a jerk, quit dragging your hate for a 1st ballot HOF QB into every post you make, a QB thats carried this offense for years, A QB that would or could have done better had the GM not spent all the resources on defense, the only reason you come here to post is to complain about Rodgers or attack my post,
good bye
Does that mean you resign? That you are leaving this forum???
Well, I for one do
not want Yoop to leave the forum. I believe he can, and often does add good commentary to the discussion. I think there are many times when most of us could take it down a notch or two.
thanks Willie
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 30 Jan 2023 20:40
by Raptorman
Yoop wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023 16:13
williewasgreat wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023 15:54
Well, I for one do
not want Yoop to leave the forum. I believe he can, and often does add good commentary to the discussion. I think there are many times when most of us could take it down a notch or two.
thanks Willie
Hey Yoop. Remember this. Only you can let people get to you. In order for them to do so you have to value their opinions. So don't put any value on their opinions and life becomes a lot easier.
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023 13:43
by Pckfn23
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023 13:44
by Drj820
Yoop wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023 16:13
williewasgreat wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023 15:54
TheSkeptic wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023 14:03
Does that mean you resign? That you are leaving this forum???
Well, I for one do
not want Yoop to leave the forum. I believe he can, and often does add good commentary to the discussion. I think there are many times when most of us could take it down a notch or two.
thanks Willie
I like you too yoop.
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023 13:45
by Scott4Pack
I suppose he will comment further on that tomorrow, with McAfee.
BTW, I enjoy thinking about an elite pro athlete of any sport “wondering” about their path forward. It kind of humanizes them a bit.
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023 13:47
by Drj820
Rodgers wants the world to wait on him.
S*** or get off the pot fam
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023 13:49
by Pckfn23
Scott4Pack wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023 13:45
I suppose he will comment further on that tomorrow, with McAfee.
This was from McAfee, today.
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023 13:51
by Yoop
Drj820 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023 13:47
Rodgers wants the world to wait on him.
S*** or get off the pot fam
He's constipated
long term side affect of ayawooska
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023 13:53
by Yoop
Drj820 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023 13:44
Yoop wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023 16:13
williewasgreat wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023 15:54
Well, I for one do
not want Yoop to leave the forum. I believe he can, and often does add good commentary to the discussion. I think there are many times when most of us could take it down a notch or two.
thanks Willie
I like you too yoop.
well thats two
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023 14:15
by NCF
Yoop wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023 13:53
Drj820 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023 13:44
Yoop wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023 16:13
thanks Willie
I like you too yoop.
well thats two
Everyone loves you, you dumb bastard. That's what you just don't get. You are an absolute pain in the ass, but we haven't shot you to the moon yet, because in many ways, your contributions are acknowledged and appreciated... definitely not all of them and there is so much room to reign you in, but you are loved you stupid idiot.
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023 14:52
by Ghost_Lombardi
"Rodgers was not asked about reports that the Packers are willing to trade him but, unprompted, said: "It sounds like there's conversations going on that aren't involving me, which are interesting."
Rodgers doesn't run the organization, no matter how big his paycheck is. What a $%@# d-bag.
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023 15:08
by Scott4Pack
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023 13:49
Scott4Pack wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023 13:45
I suppose he will comment further on that tomorrow, with McAfee.
This was from McAfee, today.
Oh gosh, I had my days mixed up. Must be retired or something!
:-)
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 01 Feb 2023 03:51
by bud fox
Can't believe a nobody 4th Rd receiver made those comments about starting hof qb.
In 90s or earlier you wouldn't be hearing about that wr again.
Shows how unprofessional and immature these kids are.
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 01 Feb 2023 07:03
by BF004
bud fox wrote: ↑01 Feb 2023 03:51
Can't believe a nobody 4th Rd receiver made those comments about starting hof qb.
In 90s or earlier you wouldn't be hearing about that wr again.
Shows how unprofessional and immature these kids are.
If you watch his interview, I don’t think he did anything wrong. He was asked point blank a question.
It’s just this 24/7 media cycle, we just hear and see everything. To be a nobody and make the news in the 90’s, you’d have to do something really big. This was a nothing, imo.
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 01 Feb 2023 07:19
by Yoop
NCF wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023 14:15
Yoop wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023 13:53
Drj820 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023 13:44
I like you too yoop.
well thats two
Everyone loves you, you dumb bastard. That's what you just don't get. You are an absolute pain in the ass, but we haven't shot you to the moon yet, because in many ways, your contributions are acknowledged and appreciated... definitely not all of them and there is so much room to reign you in, but you are loved you stupid idiot.
speechless
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 01 Feb 2023 07:24
by Yoop
Ghost_Lombardi wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023 14:52
"Rodgers was not asked about reports that the Packers are willing to trade him but, unprompted, said: "It sounds like there's conversations going on that aren't involving me, which are interesting."
Rodgers doesn't run the organization, no matter how big his paycheck is. What a $%@# d-bag.
why is it you think he's running the show simply because he'd expect to be included about what the team intends to do about his future, wouldn't you want that for yourself?
It was the same when Guty was cutting players a few years back and they'd find out they where cut from the media, respect is a two way street.
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 01 Feb 2023 07:39
by Yoop
BF004 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2023 07:03
bud fox wrote: ↑01 Feb 2023 03:51
Can't believe a nobody 4th Rd receiver made those comments about starting hof qb.
In 90s or earlier you wouldn't be hearing about that wr again.
Shows how unprofessional and immature these kids are.
If you watch his interview, I don’t think he did anything wrong. He was asked point blank a question.
It’s just this 24/7 media cycle, we just hear and see everything. To be a nobody and make the news in the 90’s, you’d have to do something really big. This was a nothing, imo.
didn't he also say something like how nice it is to be more personable with Love? I think I remember that, and if so it shows a preference, which in essence is a slam at Rodgers
In todays media, there are no nobody's, specially with anyone remotely connected to a star, anything they say concerning said STAR is bill board material, and Doubs should know that much, no, Rodgers got on his butt as he did Watson, and Doubs didn't like it, sorry, I disagree, imo Doubs new exactly what he was saying.
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 01 Feb 2023 07:51
by Pugger
Drj820 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023 13:47
Rodgers wants the world to wait on him.
S*** or get off the pot fam
I don't have a problem with him taking his time on this decision. This is a big life changing move for him. I wouldn't want to feel rushed either.
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 01 Feb 2023 07:56
by Pckfn23
I am reposting the "offending" response so that an accurate take can be had.
Re: Rodgers Watch 2023
Posted: 01 Feb 2023 08:03
by Pugger
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑01 Feb 2023 07:56
I am reposting the "offending" response so that an accurate take can had.
I didn't find it all that offending either. Rodgers is almost 40 and might be almost the same age as Romeo's parents (Doubs is 22 years old). Outside of football there probably isn't much they have in common.